Methotrexate for Ocular Inflammatory Diseases

Sapna Gangaputra, Craig W. Newcomb, Teresa L. Liesegang, R. Oktay Kaçmaz, Douglas A. Jabs, Grace A. Levy-Clarke, Robert B. Nussenblatt, James T. Rosenbaum, Eric B. Suhler, Jennifer E. Thorne, C. Stephen Foster, John H. Kempen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

187 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the outcome of treatment with methotrexate for noninfectious ocular inflammation. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Participants: Patients with noninfectious ocular inflammation managed at 4 tertiary ocular inflammation clinics in the United States observed to add methotrexate as a single, noncorticosteroid immunosuppressive agent to their treatment regimen, between 1979 and 2007, inclusive. Methods: Participants were identified from the Systemic Immunosuppressive Therapy for Eye Diseases Cohort Study. Demographic and clinical characteristics, including dosage, route of administration of methotrexate, and main outcome measures, were obtained for every eye of every patient at every visit via medical record review by trained expert reviewers. Main Outcome Measures: Control of inflammation, corticosteroid-sparing effects, and incidence of and reason for discontinuation of therapy. Results: Among 384 patients (639 eyes) observed from the point of addition of methotrexate to an anti-inflammatory regimen, 32.8%, 9.9%, 21.4%, 14.6%, 15.1%, and 6.3%, respectively, had anterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, posterior or panuveitis, scleritis, ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid, and other forms of ocular inflammation. In these groups, complete suppression of inflammation sustained for ≥28 days was achieved within 6 months in 55.6%, 47.4%, 38.6%, 56.4%, 39.5%, and 76.7%, respectively. Corticosteroid-sparing success (sustained suppression of inflammation with prednisone ≤10 mg/d) was achieved within 6 months among 46.1%, 41.3%, 20.7%, 37.3%, 36.5%, and 50.9%, respectively. Overall, success within 12 months was 66% and 58.4% for sustained control and corticosteroid sparing (≤10 mg), respectively. Methotrexate was discontinued within 1 year by 42% of patients. It was discontinued owing to ineffectiveness in 50 patients (13%); 60 patients (16%) discontinued because of side effects, which typically were reversible with dose reduction or discontinuation. Remission was seen in 43 patients, with 7.7% remitting within 1 year of treatment. Conclusions: Our data suggest that adding methotrexate to an anti-inflammatory regimen not involving other noncorticosteroid immunosuppressive drugs is moderately effective for management of inflammatory activity and for achieving corticosteroid-sparing objectives, although many months may be required for therapeutic success. Methotrexate was well tolerated by most patients, and seems to convey little risk of serious side effects during treatment. Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interests in any of the materials discussed in this article.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2188-2198.e1
JournalOphthalmology
Volume116
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Methotrexate for Ocular Inflammatory Diseases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this