Mentorship, productivity, and promotion among academic hospitalists

Mark B. Reid, Gregory J. Misky, Rebecca Harrison, Brad Sharpe, Andrew Auerbach, Jeffrey J. Glasheen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: United States academic hospitals have rapidly adopted the hospitalist model of care. Academic hospitalists have taken on much of the clinical and teaching responsibilities at many institutions, yet little is known about their academic productivity and promotion. OBJECTIVE: We sought to discover the attitudes and attributes of academic hospitalists regarding mentorship, productivity, and promotion. DESIGN: We performed a web-based email survey of academic hospitalists consisting of 61 questions. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred and twenty academic hospitalists. MAIN MEASURES: Demographic details, scholarly production, presence of mentorship and attitudes towards mentor, academic rank KEY RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-six (63%) of hospitalists responded. The majority were under 41 (80%) and had been working as hospitalists for 20% "protected" time, AOR∈=∈1.92 (95% CI 1.00, 3.69), and 3) a better-than-average understanding of the criteria for promotion, AOR∈=∈3.66 (95% CI 1.76, 7.62). A lack of mentorship was negatively associated with producing any peer-reviewed first author publications AOR∈=∈0.43 (95% CI 0.23, 0.81); any non-peer reviewed publications AOR∈=∈0.45 (95% CI 0.24, 0.83), and leading a teaching session at a national meeting AOR∈=∈0.41 (95% CI 0.19, 0.88). Most hospitalists promoted to the level of associate professor had been first author on four to six peer-reviewed publications. CONCLUSIONS: Most academic hospitalists had not presented a poster at a national meeting, authored an academic publication, or presented grand rounds at their institution. Many academic hospitalists lacked mentorship and this was associated with a failure to produce scholarly activity. Mentorship may improve academic productivity among hospitalists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-27
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Hospitalists
Mentors
Publications
Teaching
Teaching Rounds
Posters
State Hospitals

Keywords

  • faculty development
  • hospital medicine
  • mentorship
  • survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Mentorship, productivity, and promotion among academic hospitalists. / Reid, Mark B.; Misky, Gregory J.; Harrison, Rebecca; Sharpe, Brad; Auerbach, Andrew; Glasheen, Jeffrey J.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 23-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reid, Mark B. ; Misky, Gregory J. ; Harrison, Rebecca ; Sharpe, Brad ; Auerbach, Andrew ; Glasheen, Jeffrey J. / Mentorship, productivity, and promotion among academic hospitalists. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 27, No. 1. pp. 23-27.
@article{d3d4f04f8b5b4ac9a1fe2ea7be857132,
title = "Mentorship, productivity, and promotion among academic hospitalists",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: United States academic hospitals have rapidly adopted the hospitalist model of care. Academic hospitalists have taken on much of the clinical and teaching responsibilities at many institutions, yet little is known about their academic productivity and promotion. OBJECTIVE: We sought to discover the attitudes and attributes of academic hospitalists regarding mentorship, productivity, and promotion. DESIGN: We performed a web-based email survey of academic hospitalists consisting of 61 questions. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred and twenty academic hospitalists. MAIN MEASURES: Demographic details, scholarly production, presence of mentorship and attitudes towards mentor, academic rank KEY RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-six (63{\%}) of hospitalists responded. The majority were under 41 (80{\%}) and had been working as hospitalists for 20{\%} {"}protected{"} time, AOR∈=∈1.92 (95{\%} CI 1.00, 3.69), and 3) a better-than-average understanding of the criteria for promotion, AOR∈=∈3.66 (95{\%} CI 1.76, 7.62). A lack of mentorship was negatively associated with producing any peer-reviewed first author publications AOR∈=∈0.43 (95{\%} CI 0.23, 0.81); any non-peer reviewed publications AOR∈=∈0.45 (95{\%} CI 0.24, 0.83), and leading a teaching session at a national meeting AOR∈=∈0.41 (95{\%} CI 0.19, 0.88). Most hospitalists promoted to the level of associate professor had been first author on four to six peer-reviewed publications. CONCLUSIONS: Most academic hospitalists had not presented a poster at a national meeting, authored an academic publication, or presented grand rounds at their institution. Many academic hospitalists lacked mentorship and this was associated with a failure to produce scholarly activity. Mentorship may improve academic productivity among hospitalists.",
keywords = "faculty development, hospital medicine, mentorship, survey",
author = "Reid, {Mark B.} and Misky, {Gregory J.} and Rebecca Harrison and Brad Sharpe and Andrew Auerbach and Glasheen, {Jeffrey J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-011-1892-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "23--27",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mentorship, productivity, and promotion among academic hospitalists

AU - Reid, Mark B.

AU - Misky, Gregory J.

AU - Harrison, Rebecca

AU - Sharpe, Brad

AU - Auerbach, Andrew

AU - Glasheen, Jeffrey J.

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: United States academic hospitals have rapidly adopted the hospitalist model of care. Academic hospitalists have taken on much of the clinical and teaching responsibilities at many institutions, yet little is known about their academic productivity and promotion. OBJECTIVE: We sought to discover the attitudes and attributes of academic hospitalists regarding mentorship, productivity, and promotion. DESIGN: We performed a web-based email survey of academic hospitalists consisting of 61 questions. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred and twenty academic hospitalists. MAIN MEASURES: Demographic details, scholarly production, presence of mentorship and attitudes towards mentor, academic rank KEY RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-six (63%) of hospitalists responded. The majority were under 41 (80%) and had been working as hospitalists for 20% "protected" time, AOR∈=∈1.92 (95% CI 1.00, 3.69), and 3) a better-than-average understanding of the criteria for promotion, AOR∈=∈3.66 (95% CI 1.76, 7.62). A lack of mentorship was negatively associated with producing any peer-reviewed first author publications AOR∈=∈0.43 (95% CI 0.23, 0.81); any non-peer reviewed publications AOR∈=∈0.45 (95% CI 0.24, 0.83), and leading a teaching session at a national meeting AOR∈=∈0.41 (95% CI 0.19, 0.88). Most hospitalists promoted to the level of associate professor had been first author on four to six peer-reviewed publications. CONCLUSIONS: Most academic hospitalists had not presented a poster at a national meeting, authored an academic publication, or presented grand rounds at their institution. Many academic hospitalists lacked mentorship and this was associated with a failure to produce scholarly activity. Mentorship may improve academic productivity among hospitalists.

AB - BACKGROUND: United States academic hospitals have rapidly adopted the hospitalist model of care. Academic hospitalists have taken on much of the clinical and teaching responsibilities at many institutions, yet little is known about their academic productivity and promotion. OBJECTIVE: We sought to discover the attitudes and attributes of academic hospitalists regarding mentorship, productivity, and promotion. DESIGN: We performed a web-based email survey of academic hospitalists consisting of 61 questions. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred and twenty academic hospitalists. MAIN MEASURES: Demographic details, scholarly production, presence of mentorship and attitudes towards mentor, academic rank KEY RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-six (63%) of hospitalists responded. The majority were under 41 (80%) and had been working as hospitalists for 20% "protected" time, AOR∈=∈1.92 (95% CI 1.00, 3.69), and 3) a better-than-average understanding of the criteria for promotion, AOR∈=∈3.66 (95% CI 1.76, 7.62). A lack of mentorship was negatively associated with producing any peer-reviewed first author publications AOR∈=∈0.43 (95% CI 0.23, 0.81); any non-peer reviewed publications AOR∈=∈0.45 (95% CI 0.24, 0.83), and leading a teaching session at a national meeting AOR∈=∈0.41 (95% CI 0.19, 0.88). Most hospitalists promoted to the level of associate professor had been first author on four to six peer-reviewed publications. CONCLUSIONS: Most academic hospitalists had not presented a poster at a national meeting, authored an academic publication, or presented grand rounds at their institution. Many academic hospitalists lacked mentorship and this was associated with a failure to produce scholarly activity. Mentorship may improve academic productivity among hospitalists.

KW - faculty development

KW - hospital medicine

KW - mentorship

KW - survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856697487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856697487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-011-1892-5

DO - 10.1007/s11606-011-1892-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 21953327

AN - SCOPUS:84856697487

VL - 27

SP - 23

EP - 27

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 1

ER -