Meeting the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies using established residency training program assessment tools

Karen J. Brasel, Dawn Bragg, Deborah E. Simpson, John A. Weigelt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Most existing residency evaluation tools were constructed to evaluate the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies. Methods Before ACGME's six competency based assessment requirements for resident performance were developed, we created a residency evaluation tool with 5 domains important to successful surgical resident performance. Reliability was determined after 6 months of use. Factor analysis assessed whether the evaluation tool was a construct-valid measure of the ACGME competencies. Results Three hundred forty-three evaluations for 36 surgical residents were tested. The original evaluation tool was highly reliable with an overall reliability of 0.97. Factor analysis defined 4 new combinations of questions analogous to 4 of the ACGME competencies: professionalism (reliability 0.95), patient care (reliability 0.93), medical knowledge (reliability 0.92), and communication (reliability 0.92). The new competency clusters were correlated with each other to a moderate degree. Conclusions Our locally developed tool demonstrated high reliability and construct validity for 4 of 6 ACGME competencies. The correlation between factors suggests overlap between competencies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9-12
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican journal of surgery
Volume188
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies
  • Evaluation tools
  • Residency evaluation
  • Traditional rating form

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Meeting the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies using established residency training program assessment tools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this