Medical students and radiology residents

Can they learn as effectively with the same educational materials?

J. Collins, J. D. Riebe, M. A. Albanese, N. Dobos, K. Heiserman, Steven Primack, E. A. Kazerooni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of resident-prepared, independent-learning materials for teaching chest radiology to medical students. Materials and Methods. Students from three U.S. medical schools enrolled in radiology clerkships between March 1998 and June 1998 were randomly divided into control (n = 27) and experimental (n = 31) groups. The experimental group studied 12 chest radiology independent-learning cases (intervention) used to teach radiology residents in a previous study. Both groups took a 36-item, multiple-choice test (previously used to test radiology residents) on three occasions (before intervention [pretest], 1 day after intervention [posttest], and 2-4 weeks after intervention [final examination]). Student scores were then compared with resident scores. Results. Mean scores were similar across institutions at pretest, but increases at posttest and final examination scores differed across time, school, and group (P <.005). Mean differences in scores between experimental and control groups at pretest, posttest, and 2-4-week final examination were -0.22, 9.79, and 9.14, respectively, demonstrating increased performance at posttesting that remained present (though slightly attenuated) 2-4 weeks later. Comparing performance, residents had mean pretest scores of 19.2 and students of 14.1, a five-point difference attributable to the residents' greater experience. Both residents and students gained approximately nine points at posttest. At final examination, the difference between residents and students was only 1.4 points, suggesting the experimental program (teaching materials) brought students close to the long-term retention shown by residents. Conclusion. Independent study of resident-prepared chest radiology teaching cases increased medical student knowledge for at least 2 or 4 weeks after instruction. Although starting at lower knowledge levels, students experienced gains in knowledge comparable to those of residents, suggesting the same materials can be used to teach both students and residents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)691-695
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic Radiology
Volume6
Issue number11 SUPPL. 7
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medical Students
Radiology
Students
Teaching Materials
Thorax
Learning
Medical Schools
Teaching
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Medical student education
  • Radiology teaching materials
  • Teaching radiology to medical students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Collins, J., Riebe, J. D., Albanese, M. A., Dobos, N., Heiserman, K., Primack, S., & Kazerooni, E. A. (1999). Medical students and radiology residents: Can they learn as effectively with the same educational materials? Academic Radiology, 6(11 SUPPL. 7), 691-695.

Medical students and radiology residents : Can they learn as effectively with the same educational materials? / Collins, J.; Riebe, J. D.; Albanese, M. A.; Dobos, N.; Heiserman, K.; Primack, Steven; Kazerooni, E. A.

In: Academic Radiology, Vol. 6, No. 11 SUPPL. 7, 1999, p. 691-695.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Collins, J, Riebe, JD, Albanese, MA, Dobos, N, Heiserman, K, Primack, S & Kazerooni, EA 1999, 'Medical students and radiology residents: Can they learn as effectively with the same educational materials?', Academic Radiology, vol. 6, no. 11 SUPPL. 7, pp. 691-695.
Collins J, Riebe JD, Albanese MA, Dobos N, Heiserman K, Primack S et al. Medical students and radiology residents: Can they learn as effectively with the same educational materials? Academic Radiology. 1999;6(11 SUPPL. 7):691-695.
Collins, J. ; Riebe, J. D. ; Albanese, M. A. ; Dobos, N. ; Heiserman, K. ; Primack, Steven ; Kazerooni, E. A. / Medical students and radiology residents : Can they learn as effectively with the same educational materials?. In: Academic Radiology. 1999 ; Vol. 6, No. 11 SUPPL. 7. pp. 691-695.
@article{ffeb4d6eff914c94beb220ff365a2814,
title = "Medical students and radiology residents: Can they learn as effectively with the same educational materials?",
abstract = "Rationale and Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of resident-prepared, independent-learning materials for teaching chest radiology to medical students. Materials and Methods. Students from three U.S. medical schools enrolled in radiology clerkships between March 1998 and June 1998 were randomly divided into control (n = 27) and experimental (n = 31) groups. The experimental group studied 12 chest radiology independent-learning cases (intervention) used to teach radiology residents in a previous study. Both groups took a 36-item, multiple-choice test (previously used to test radiology residents) on three occasions (before intervention [pretest], 1 day after intervention [posttest], and 2-4 weeks after intervention [final examination]). Student scores were then compared with resident scores. Results. Mean scores were similar across institutions at pretest, but increases at posttest and final examination scores differed across time, school, and group (P <.005). Mean differences in scores between experimental and control groups at pretest, posttest, and 2-4-week final examination were -0.22, 9.79, and 9.14, respectively, demonstrating increased performance at posttesting that remained present (though slightly attenuated) 2-4 weeks later. Comparing performance, residents had mean pretest scores of 19.2 and students of 14.1, a five-point difference attributable to the residents' greater experience. Both residents and students gained approximately nine points at posttest. At final examination, the difference between residents and students was only 1.4 points, suggesting the experimental program (teaching materials) brought students close to the long-term retention shown by residents. Conclusion. Independent study of resident-prepared chest radiology teaching cases increased medical student knowledge for at least 2 or 4 weeks after instruction. Although starting at lower knowledge levels, students experienced gains in knowledge comparable to those of residents, suggesting the same materials can be used to teach both students and residents.",
keywords = "Medical student education, Radiology teaching materials, Teaching radiology to medical students",
author = "J. Collins and Riebe, {J. D.} and Albanese, {M. A.} and N. Dobos and K. Heiserman and Steven Primack and Kazerooni, {E. A.}",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "691--695",
journal = "Academic Radiology",
issn = "1076-6332",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "11 SUPPL. 7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical students and radiology residents

T2 - Can they learn as effectively with the same educational materials?

AU - Collins, J.

AU - Riebe, J. D.

AU - Albanese, M. A.

AU - Dobos, N.

AU - Heiserman, K.

AU - Primack, Steven

AU - Kazerooni, E. A.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Rationale and Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of resident-prepared, independent-learning materials for teaching chest radiology to medical students. Materials and Methods. Students from three U.S. medical schools enrolled in radiology clerkships between March 1998 and June 1998 were randomly divided into control (n = 27) and experimental (n = 31) groups. The experimental group studied 12 chest radiology independent-learning cases (intervention) used to teach radiology residents in a previous study. Both groups took a 36-item, multiple-choice test (previously used to test radiology residents) on three occasions (before intervention [pretest], 1 day after intervention [posttest], and 2-4 weeks after intervention [final examination]). Student scores were then compared with resident scores. Results. Mean scores were similar across institutions at pretest, but increases at posttest and final examination scores differed across time, school, and group (P <.005). Mean differences in scores between experimental and control groups at pretest, posttest, and 2-4-week final examination were -0.22, 9.79, and 9.14, respectively, demonstrating increased performance at posttesting that remained present (though slightly attenuated) 2-4 weeks later. Comparing performance, residents had mean pretest scores of 19.2 and students of 14.1, a five-point difference attributable to the residents' greater experience. Both residents and students gained approximately nine points at posttest. At final examination, the difference between residents and students was only 1.4 points, suggesting the experimental program (teaching materials) brought students close to the long-term retention shown by residents. Conclusion. Independent study of resident-prepared chest radiology teaching cases increased medical student knowledge for at least 2 or 4 weeks after instruction. Although starting at lower knowledge levels, students experienced gains in knowledge comparable to those of residents, suggesting the same materials can be used to teach both students and residents.

AB - Rationale and Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of resident-prepared, independent-learning materials for teaching chest radiology to medical students. Materials and Methods. Students from three U.S. medical schools enrolled in radiology clerkships between March 1998 and June 1998 were randomly divided into control (n = 27) and experimental (n = 31) groups. The experimental group studied 12 chest radiology independent-learning cases (intervention) used to teach radiology residents in a previous study. Both groups took a 36-item, multiple-choice test (previously used to test radiology residents) on three occasions (before intervention [pretest], 1 day after intervention [posttest], and 2-4 weeks after intervention [final examination]). Student scores were then compared with resident scores. Results. Mean scores were similar across institutions at pretest, but increases at posttest and final examination scores differed across time, school, and group (P <.005). Mean differences in scores between experimental and control groups at pretest, posttest, and 2-4-week final examination were -0.22, 9.79, and 9.14, respectively, demonstrating increased performance at posttesting that remained present (though slightly attenuated) 2-4 weeks later. Comparing performance, residents had mean pretest scores of 19.2 and students of 14.1, a five-point difference attributable to the residents' greater experience. Both residents and students gained approximately nine points at posttest. At final examination, the difference between residents and students was only 1.4 points, suggesting the experimental program (teaching materials) brought students close to the long-term retention shown by residents. Conclusion. Independent study of resident-prepared chest radiology teaching cases increased medical student knowledge for at least 2 or 4 weeks after instruction. Although starting at lower knowledge levels, students experienced gains in knowledge comparable to those of residents, suggesting the same materials can be used to teach both students and residents.

KW - Medical student education

KW - Radiology teaching materials

KW - Teaching radiology to medical students

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033277594&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033277594&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 691

EP - 695

JO - Academic Radiology

JF - Academic Radiology

SN - 1076-6332

IS - 11 SUPPL. 7

ER -