Medical malpractice in endourology: Analysis of closed cases from the state of New York

Brian Duty, Zhamshid Okhunov, Zeph Okeke, Arthur Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Medical malpractice indemnity payments continue to rise, resulting in increased insurance premiums. We reviewed closed malpractice claims pertaining to endourological procedures with the goal of helping urologists mitigate their risk of lawsuit. All closed malpractice claims from 2005 to 2010 pertaining to endourological procedures filed against urologists insured by the Medical Liability Mutual Insurance Company of New York were examined. Claims were reviewed for plaintiff demographics, medical history, operative details, alleged complication, clinical outcome and lawsuit disposition. A total of 25 closed claims involved endourological operations and of these cases 10 were closed with an indemnity payment. The average payout was $346,722 (range $25,000 to $995,000). Of the plaintiffs 16 were women and mean plaintiff age was 51.4 years. Cystoscopy with ureteral stent placement/exchange resulted in 13 lawsuits, ureteroscopic lithotripsy 8, percutaneous stone extraction 2 and shock wave lithotripsy 2. There were 17 malpractice suits brought for alleged operative complications. Failure to arrange adequate followup was implicated in 4 cases. Error in diagnosis and delay in treatment was alleged in 3 claims. Urologists are not immune to the current medical malpractice crisis. Endourology and urological oncology generate the greatest number of lawsuits against urologists. Most malpractice claims involving endourological procedures result from urolithiasis and alleged technical errors. Therefore, careful attention to surgical technique is essential during stone procedures to reduce the risk of malpractice litigation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)528-532
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume187
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Malpractice
Insurance
Lithotripsy
Liability Insurance
Legal Liability
Cystoscopy
Urolithiasis
Jurisprudence
Stents
Demography
Urologists

Keywords

  • endoscopy
  • insurance
  • malpractice
  • risk management
  • urology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Medical malpractice in endourology : Analysis of closed cases from the state of New York. / Duty, Brian; Okhunov, Zhamshid; Okeke, Zeph; Smith, Arthur.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 187, No. 2, 02.2012, p. 528-532.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Duty, Brian ; Okhunov, Zhamshid ; Okeke, Zeph ; Smith, Arthur. / Medical malpractice in endourology : Analysis of closed cases from the state of New York. In: Journal of Urology. 2012 ; Vol. 187, No. 2. pp. 528-532.
@article{99601dfc762e4db493477004ebc278d0,
title = "Medical malpractice in endourology: Analysis of closed cases from the state of New York",
abstract = "Medical malpractice indemnity payments continue to rise, resulting in increased insurance premiums. We reviewed closed malpractice claims pertaining to endourological procedures with the goal of helping urologists mitigate their risk of lawsuit. All closed malpractice claims from 2005 to 2010 pertaining to endourological procedures filed against urologists insured by the Medical Liability Mutual Insurance Company of New York were examined. Claims were reviewed for plaintiff demographics, medical history, operative details, alleged complication, clinical outcome and lawsuit disposition. A total of 25 closed claims involved endourological operations and of these cases 10 were closed with an indemnity payment. The average payout was $346,722 (range $25,000 to $995,000). Of the plaintiffs 16 were women and mean plaintiff age was 51.4 years. Cystoscopy with ureteral stent placement/exchange resulted in 13 lawsuits, ureteroscopic lithotripsy 8, percutaneous stone extraction 2 and shock wave lithotripsy 2. There were 17 malpractice suits brought for alleged operative complications. Failure to arrange adequate followup was implicated in 4 cases. Error in diagnosis and delay in treatment was alleged in 3 claims. Urologists are not immune to the current medical malpractice crisis. Endourology and urological oncology generate the greatest number of lawsuits against urologists. Most malpractice claims involving endourological procedures result from urolithiasis and alleged technical errors. Therefore, careful attention to surgical technique is essential during stone procedures to reduce the risk of malpractice litigation.",
keywords = "endoscopy, insurance, malpractice, risk management, urology",
author = "Brian Duty and Zhamshid Okhunov and Zeph Okeke and Arthur Smith",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.045",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "187",
pages = "528--532",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medical malpractice in endourology

T2 - Analysis of closed cases from the state of New York

AU - Duty, Brian

AU - Okhunov, Zhamshid

AU - Okeke, Zeph

AU - Smith, Arthur

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - Medical malpractice indemnity payments continue to rise, resulting in increased insurance premiums. We reviewed closed malpractice claims pertaining to endourological procedures with the goal of helping urologists mitigate their risk of lawsuit. All closed malpractice claims from 2005 to 2010 pertaining to endourological procedures filed against urologists insured by the Medical Liability Mutual Insurance Company of New York were examined. Claims were reviewed for plaintiff demographics, medical history, operative details, alleged complication, clinical outcome and lawsuit disposition. A total of 25 closed claims involved endourological operations and of these cases 10 were closed with an indemnity payment. The average payout was $346,722 (range $25,000 to $995,000). Of the plaintiffs 16 were women and mean plaintiff age was 51.4 years. Cystoscopy with ureteral stent placement/exchange resulted in 13 lawsuits, ureteroscopic lithotripsy 8, percutaneous stone extraction 2 and shock wave lithotripsy 2. There were 17 malpractice suits brought for alleged operative complications. Failure to arrange adequate followup was implicated in 4 cases. Error in diagnosis and delay in treatment was alleged in 3 claims. Urologists are not immune to the current medical malpractice crisis. Endourology and urological oncology generate the greatest number of lawsuits against urologists. Most malpractice claims involving endourological procedures result from urolithiasis and alleged technical errors. Therefore, careful attention to surgical technique is essential during stone procedures to reduce the risk of malpractice litigation.

AB - Medical malpractice indemnity payments continue to rise, resulting in increased insurance premiums. We reviewed closed malpractice claims pertaining to endourological procedures with the goal of helping urologists mitigate their risk of lawsuit. All closed malpractice claims from 2005 to 2010 pertaining to endourological procedures filed against urologists insured by the Medical Liability Mutual Insurance Company of New York were examined. Claims were reviewed for plaintiff demographics, medical history, operative details, alleged complication, clinical outcome and lawsuit disposition. A total of 25 closed claims involved endourological operations and of these cases 10 were closed with an indemnity payment. The average payout was $346,722 (range $25,000 to $995,000). Of the plaintiffs 16 were women and mean plaintiff age was 51.4 years. Cystoscopy with ureteral stent placement/exchange resulted in 13 lawsuits, ureteroscopic lithotripsy 8, percutaneous stone extraction 2 and shock wave lithotripsy 2. There were 17 malpractice suits brought for alleged operative complications. Failure to arrange adequate followup was implicated in 4 cases. Error in diagnosis and delay in treatment was alleged in 3 claims. Urologists are not immune to the current medical malpractice crisis. Endourology and urological oncology generate the greatest number of lawsuits against urologists. Most malpractice claims involving endourological procedures result from urolithiasis and alleged technical errors. Therefore, careful attention to surgical technique is essential during stone procedures to reduce the risk of malpractice litigation.

KW - endoscopy

KW - insurance

KW - malpractice

KW - risk management

KW - urology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855577142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855577142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.045

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.045

M3 - Article

C2 - 22177166

AN - SCOPUS:84855577142

VL - 187

SP - 528

EP - 532

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 2

ER -