Measuring turn-taking offsets in human-human dialogues

Rebecca Lunsford, Peter Heeman, Emma Rennie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the pauses, gaps and overlaps associated with turn-taking in order to better understand how people engage in this activity, which should lead to more natural and effective spoken dialogue systems. This paper makes three advances in studying these durations. First, we take into account the type of turn-taking event, carefully treating interruptions, dual starts, and delayed backchannels, as these can make it appear that turn-taking is more disorderly than it really is. Second, we do not view turn-transitions in isolation, but consider turntransitions and turn-continuations together, as equal alternatives of what could have occurred. Third, we use the distributions of turn-transition and turn-continuation offsets (gaps, overlaps, and pauses) to shed light on the extent to which turn-taking is negotiated by the two conversants versus controlled by the current speaker.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2895-2899
Number of pages5
JournalUnknown Journal
Volume08-12-September-2016
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Continuation
Overlap
Spoken Dialogue Systems
Human
Dialogue
Turn-taking
Isolation
Pause
Alternatives
Controlled
Backchannel
Interruption

Keywords

  • Overlapping speech
  • Turn-fights
  • Turn-taking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Signal Processing
  • Software
  • Modeling and Simulation

Cite this

Measuring turn-taking offsets in human-human dialogues. / Lunsford, Rebecca; Heeman, Peter; Rennie, Emma.

In: Unknown Journal, Vol. 08-12-September-2016, 2016, p. 2895-2899.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lunsford, Rebecca ; Heeman, Peter ; Rennie, Emma. / Measuring turn-taking offsets in human-human dialogues. In: Unknown Journal. 2016 ; Vol. 08-12-September-2016. pp. 2895-2899.
@article{11258ca4e1a84b599697e53e8640c59b,
title = "Measuring turn-taking offsets in human-human dialogues",
abstract = "This paper examines the pauses, gaps and overlaps associated with turn-taking in order to better understand how people engage in this activity, which should lead to more natural and effective spoken dialogue systems. This paper makes three advances in studying these durations. First, we take into account the type of turn-taking event, carefully treating interruptions, dual starts, and delayed backchannels, as these can make it appear that turn-taking is more disorderly than it really is. Second, we do not view turn-transitions in isolation, but consider turntransitions and turn-continuations together, as equal alternatives of what could have occurred. Third, we use the distributions of turn-transition and turn-continuation offsets (gaps, overlaps, and pauses) to shed light on the extent to which turn-taking is negotiated by the two conversants versus controlled by the current speaker.",
keywords = "Overlapping speech, Turn-fights, Turn-taking",
author = "Rebecca Lunsford and Peter Heeman and Emma Rennie",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.21437/Interspeech.2016-1350",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "08-12-September-2016",
pages = "2895--2899",
journal = "Indian Journal of Rheumatology",
issn = "0973-3698",
publisher = "Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring turn-taking offsets in human-human dialogues

AU - Lunsford, Rebecca

AU - Heeman, Peter

AU - Rennie, Emma

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This paper examines the pauses, gaps and overlaps associated with turn-taking in order to better understand how people engage in this activity, which should lead to more natural and effective spoken dialogue systems. This paper makes three advances in studying these durations. First, we take into account the type of turn-taking event, carefully treating interruptions, dual starts, and delayed backchannels, as these can make it appear that turn-taking is more disorderly than it really is. Second, we do not view turn-transitions in isolation, but consider turntransitions and turn-continuations together, as equal alternatives of what could have occurred. Third, we use the distributions of turn-transition and turn-continuation offsets (gaps, overlaps, and pauses) to shed light on the extent to which turn-taking is negotiated by the two conversants versus controlled by the current speaker.

AB - This paper examines the pauses, gaps and overlaps associated with turn-taking in order to better understand how people engage in this activity, which should lead to more natural and effective spoken dialogue systems. This paper makes three advances in studying these durations. First, we take into account the type of turn-taking event, carefully treating interruptions, dual starts, and delayed backchannels, as these can make it appear that turn-taking is more disorderly than it really is. Second, we do not view turn-transitions in isolation, but consider turntransitions and turn-continuations together, as equal alternatives of what could have occurred. Third, we use the distributions of turn-transition and turn-continuation offsets (gaps, overlaps, and pauses) to shed light on the extent to which turn-taking is negotiated by the two conversants versus controlled by the current speaker.

KW - Overlapping speech

KW - Turn-fights

KW - Turn-taking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994217932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994217932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21437/Interspeech.2016-1350

DO - 10.21437/Interspeech.2016-1350

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84994217932

VL - 08-12-September-2016

SP - 2895

EP - 2899

JO - Indian Journal of Rheumatology

JF - Indian Journal of Rheumatology

SN - 0973-3698

ER -