Measuring the levator hiatus with axial MRI sequences: Adjusting the angle of acquisition

William (Tom) Gregory, Rahel Nardos, Teresa Worstell, Amy Thurmond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims We aimed to compare MRI measurements of the female levator hiatus and the most caudal "levator ani" muscles between image slices in a plane axial to the body (AxB) and an axial plane parallel to the direction of the puborectalis muscle (AxPRM). Methods We performed high-resolution, T2-weighted axial magnetic resonance imaging (in two different planes) on 20 sequentially recruited asymptomatic nulliparous women. Levator hiatus measurements were compared between the two planes. Results The mean tilt angle of the AxPRM slices relative to the AxB slices was 18.9° (SD 8.5) and the area of the levator hiatus was 10% greater (P=0.04) in the AxPRM plane. Conclusions By rotating the acquisition plane to be parallel to the puborectalis muscle (sometimes called the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions), some of the measurements of the distal and medial pelvic floor muscles (and the hiatus defined by them) are altered. This issue is important because both MRI and 3D ultrasound are increasingly being used to evaluate the pelvic floor hiatus, and its relationship to childbirth injury and pelvic floor disorders. To make meaningful comparisons, it is important that both modalities are measuring the same thing. Neurourol. Urodynam. 30:113-116, 2011.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-116
Number of pages4
JournalNeurourology and Urodynamics
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Muscles
Pelvic Floor
Pelvic Floor Disorders
Anal Canal
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Parturition
Wounds and Injuries
Direction compound

Keywords

  • anatomy
  • levator ani
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • pelvic floor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Urology

Cite this

Measuring the levator hiatus with axial MRI sequences : Adjusting the angle of acquisition. / Gregory, William (Tom); Nardos, Rahel; Worstell, Teresa; Thurmond, Amy.

In: Neurourology and Urodynamics, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 113-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7d537a39218442c9b9eb0378585282e6,
title = "Measuring the levator hiatus with axial MRI sequences: Adjusting the angle of acquisition",
abstract = "Aims We aimed to compare MRI measurements of the female levator hiatus and the most caudal {"}levator ani{"} muscles between image slices in a plane axial to the body (AxB) and an axial plane parallel to the direction of the puborectalis muscle (AxPRM). Methods We performed high-resolution, T2-weighted axial magnetic resonance imaging (in two different planes) on 20 sequentially recruited asymptomatic nulliparous women. Levator hiatus measurements were compared between the two planes. Results The mean tilt angle of the AxPRM slices relative to the AxB slices was 18.9° (SD 8.5) and the area of the levator hiatus was 10{\%} greater (P=0.04) in the AxPRM plane. Conclusions By rotating the acquisition plane to be parallel to the puborectalis muscle (sometimes called the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions), some of the measurements of the distal and medial pelvic floor muscles (and the hiatus defined by them) are altered. This issue is important because both MRI and 3D ultrasound are increasingly being used to evaluate the pelvic floor hiatus, and its relationship to childbirth injury and pelvic floor disorders. To make meaningful comparisons, it is important that both modalities are measuring the same thing. Neurourol. Urodynam. 30:113-116, 2011.",
keywords = "anatomy, levator ani, magnetic resonance imaging, pelvic floor",
author = "Gregory, {William (Tom)} and Rahel Nardos and Teresa Worstell and Amy Thurmond",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1002/nau.20957",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "113--116",
journal = "Neurourology and Urodynamics",
issn = "0733-2467",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring the levator hiatus with axial MRI sequences

T2 - Adjusting the angle of acquisition

AU - Gregory, William (Tom)

AU - Nardos, Rahel

AU - Worstell, Teresa

AU - Thurmond, Amy

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - Aims We aimed to compare MRI measurements of the female levator hiatus and the most caudal "levator ani" muscles between image slices in a plane axial to the body (AxB) and an axial plane parallel to the direction of the puborectalis muscle (AxPRM). Methods We performed high-resolution, T2-weighted axial magnetic resonance imaging (in two different planes) on 20 sequentially recruited asymptomatic nulliparous women. Levator hiatus measurements were compared between the two planes. Results The mean tilt angle of the AxPRM slices relative to the AxB slices was 18.9° (SD 8.5) and the area of the levator hiatus was 10% greater (P=0.04) in the AxPRM plane. Conclusions By rotating the acquisition plane to be parallel to the puborectalis muscle (sometimes called the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions), some of the measurements of the distal and medial pelvic floor muscles (and the hiatus defined by them) are altered. This issue is important because both MRI and 3D ultrasound are increasingly being used to evaluate the pelvic floor hiatus, and its relationship to childbirth injury and pelvic floor disorders. To make meaningful comparisons, it is important that both modalities are measuring the same thing. Neurourol. Urodynam. 30:113-116, 2011.

AB - Aims We aimed to compare MRI measurements of the female levator hiatus and the most caudal "levator ani" muscles between image slices in a plane axial to the body (AxB) and an axial plane parallel to the direction of the puborectalis muscle (AxPRM). Methods We performed high-resolution, T2-weighted axial magnetic resonance imaging (in two different planes) on 20 sequentially recruited asymptomatic nulliparous women. Levator hiatus measurements were compared between the two planes. Results The mean tilt angle of the AxPRM slices relative to the AxB slices was 18.9° (SD 8.5) and the area of the levator hiatus was 10% greater (P=0.04) in the AxPRM plane. Conclusions By rotating the acquisition plane to be parallel to the puborectalis muscle (sometimes called the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions), some of the measurements of the distal and medial pelvic floor muscles (and the hiatus defined by them) are altered. This issue is important because both MRI and 3D ultrasound are increasingly being used to evaluate the pelvic floor hiatus, and its relationship to childbirth injury and pelvic floor disorders. To make meaningful comparisons, it is important that both modalities are measuring the same thing. Neurourol. Urodynam. 30:113-116, 2011.

KW - anatomy

KW - levator ani

KW - magnetic resonance imaging

KW - pelvic floor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78651094164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78651094164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/nau.20957

DO - 10.1002/nau.20957

M3 - Article

C2 - 21046654

AN - SCOPUS:78651094164

VL - 30

SP - 113

EP - 116

JO - Neurourology and Urodynamics

JF - Neurourology and Urodynamics

SN - 0733-2467

IS - 1

ER -