Measuring the health status gap for American Indians/Alaska Natives

Getting closer to the truth

Emily Puukka, Paul Stehr-Green, Thomas Becker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. We compared the historical method of calculating cancer incidence rates with 2 new methods to determine which approach optimally estimates the burden of cancer among the Northwest American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) population. Methods. The first method replicates the traditional way of calculating race-specific rates, and the 2 new methods use probabilistic record linkages to ascertain cancer cases. We indirectly adjusted all rates to the standard 2000 US population, Results. Whereas the historical cancer incidence rates for all races are more than double those for the AIAN population, this apparent gap is considerably narrower when the all-race rates are compared with AlAN-specific rates calculated with probabilistic linkage methods. Similarly, there is no meaningful difference in incidence rates for selected site- and gender-specific cancers between the AIAN population and all races combined, and, in fact, some of these rates may be higher among the AIAN population. Conclusions. Our results suggest that the burden of cancer among the AIAN population is considerably higher than was previously understood. We recommend that a standardized approach based on probabilistic linkage methods be adopted and that adequate financial and technical support be made available for conducting routine linkage studies throughout Indian communities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)838-843
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume95
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

North American Indians
Health Status
Population
Neoplasms
Incidence
Financial Support
Alaska Natives

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Measuring the health status gap for American Indians/Alaska Natives : Getting closer to the truth. / Puukka, Emily; Stehr-Green, Paul; Becker, Thomas.

In: American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 95, No. 5, 05.2005, p. 838-843.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{192cee8c0b364e2c9f10445a73de6520,
title = "Measuring the health status gap for American Indians/Alaska Natives: Getting closer to the truth",
abstract = "Objectives. We compared the historical method of calculating cancer incidence rates with 2 new methods to determine which approach optimally estimates the burden of cancer among the Northwest American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) population. Methods. The first method replicates the traditional way of calculating race-specific rates, and the 2 new methods use probabilistic record linkages to ascertain cancer cases. We indirectly adjusted all rates to the standard 2000 US population, Results. Whereas the historical cancer incidence rates for all races are more than double those for the AIAN population, this apparent gap is considerably narrower when the all-race rates are compared with AlAN-specific rates calculated with probabilistic linkage methods. Similarly, there is no meaningful difference in incidence rates for selected site- and gender-specific cancers between the AIAN population and all races combined, and, in fact, some of these rates may be higher among the AIAN population. Conclusions. Our results suggest that the burden of cancer among the AIAN population is considerably higher than was previously understood. We recommend that a standardized approach based on probabilistic linkage methods be adopted and that adequate financial and technical support be made available for conducting routine linkage studies throughout Indian communities.",
author = "Emily Puukka and Paul Stehr-Green and Thomas Becker",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.2004.053769",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "838--843",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring the health status gap for American Indians/Alaska Natives

T2 - Getting closer to the truth

AU - Puukka, Emily

AU - Stehr-Green, Paul

AU - Becker, Thomas

PY - 2005/5

Y1 - 2005/5

N2 - Objectives. We compared the historical method of calculating cancer incidence rates with 2 new methods to determine which approach optimally estimates the burden of cancer among the Northwest American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) population. Methods. The first method replicates the traditional way of calculating race-specific rates, and the 2 new methods use probabilistic record linkages to ascertain cancer cases. We indirectly adjusted all rates to the standard 2000 US population, Results. Whereas the historical cancer incidence rates for all races are more than double those for the AIAN population, this apparent gap is considerably narrower when the all-race rates are compared with AlAN-specific rates calculated with probabilistic linkage methods. Similarly, there is no meaningful difference in incidence rates for selected site- and gender-specific cancers between the AIAN population and all races combined, and, in fact, some of these rates may be higher among the AIAN population. Conclusions. Our results suggest that the burden of cancer among the AIAN population is considerably higher than was previously understood. We recommend that a standardized approach based on probabilistic linkage methods be adopted and that adequate financial and technical support be made available for conducting routine linkage studies throughout Indian communities.

AB - Objectives. We compared the historical method of calculating cancer incidence rates with 2 new methods to determine which approach optimally estimates the burden of cancer among the Northwest American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) population. Methods. The first method replicates the traditional way of calculating race-specific rates, and the 2 new methods use probabilistic record linkages to ascertain cancer cases. We indirectly adjusted all rates to the standard 2000 US population, Results. Whereas the historical cancer incidence rates for all races are more than double those for the AIAN population, this apparent gap is considerably narrower when the all-race rates are compared with AlAN-specific rates calculated with probabilistic linkage methods. Similarly, there is no meaningful difference in incidence rates for selected site- and gender-specific cancers between the AIAN population and all races combined, and, in fact, some of these rates may be higher among the AIAN population. Conclusions. Our results suggest that the burden of cancer among the AIAN population is considerably higher than was previously understood. We recommend that a standardized approach based on probabilistic linkage methods be adopted and that adequate financial and technical support be made available for conducting routine linkage studies throughout Indian communities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17844384199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17844384199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2004.053769

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2004.053769

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 838

EP - 843

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 5

ER -