Measuring team development in clinical care settings

Ronald Stock, Eldon Mahoney, Patricia (Patty) Carney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background And Objectives: Our objective was to describe the psychometric properties of a measure of team development that can be used to assess and guide team functioning in health care settings. Methods: The Team Development Measure (TDM) is a 31-item questionnaire constructed using the Rasch rating scale measurement model. We conducted an Mplus exploratory factor analysis using data collected from 1,194 individuals representing 120 different teams. Team size ranged from three to 39 members from rural and urban inpatient and ambulatory health care settings. Here we characterize the domains of teamness, while taking into account the development of teams over time. Results: The TDM was found to have good psychometric properties with little measurement error and a Rasch person reliability of 0.95. Overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.97. An Mplus exploratory factor analysis combined with the stochastic nature of the Rasch model suggests a developmental sequence in building teams consisting of four sub-domains with the following mean item difficulty scores: cohesion=40.5, standard deviation (SD)=2.68, communication= 49.3 (SD=2.78), roles and goals=52.7 (SD=2.74), and team primacy=53.3 (SD=1.06). This pattern suggests cohesiveness is an initial element for team development, followed by communication, roles and goals clarity, and team primacy. Conclusions: We developed and tested a measure of team development that has strong psychometric properties. This tool could be used to study how team functioning affects clinical outcomes and as a quality improvement tool to improve team function.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)691-700
Number of pages10
JournalFamily Medicine
Volume45
Issue number10
StatePublished - Nov 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
Statistical Factor Analysis
Communication
Delivery of Health Care
Ambulatory Care
Quality Improvement
Inpatients

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Measuring team development in clinical care settings. / Stock, Ronald; Mahoney, Eldon; Carney, Patricia (Patty).

In: Family Medicine, Vol. 45, No. 10, 11.2013, p. 691-700.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stock, R, Mahoney, E & Carney, PP 2013, 'Measuring team development in clinical care settings', Family Medicine, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 691-700.
Stock, Ronald ; Mahoney, Eldon ; Carney, Patricia (Patty). / Measuring team development in clinical care settings. In: Family Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 45, No. 10. pp. 691-700.
@article{8c3322e5889f48bcb761be955472791f,
title = "Measuring team development in clinical care settings",
abstract = "Background And Objectives: Our objective was to describe the psychometric properties of a measure of team development that can be used to assess and guide team functioning in health care settings. Methods: The Team Development Measure (TDM) is a 31-item questionnaire constructed using the Rasch rating scale measurement model. We conducted an Mplus exploratory factor analysis using data collected from 1,194 individuals representing 120 different teams. Team size ranged from three to 39 members from rural and urban inpatient and ambulatory health care settings. Here we characterize the domains of teamness, while taking into account the development of teams over time. Results: The TDM was found to have good psychometric properties with little measurement error and a Rasch person reliability of 0.95. Overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.97. An Mplus exploratory factor analysis combined with the stochastic nature of the Rasch model suggests a developmental sequence in building teams consisting of four sub-domains with the following mean item difficulty scores: cohesion=40.5, standard deviation (SD)=2.68, communication= 49.3 (SD=2.78), roles and goals=52.7 (SD=2.74), and team primacy=53.3 (SD=1.06). This pattern suggests cohesiveness is an initial element for team development, followed by communication, roles and goals clarity, and team primacy. Conclusions: We developed and tested a measure of team development that has strong psychometric properties. This tool could be used to study how team functioning affects clinical outcomes and as a quality improvement tool to improve team function.",
author = "Ronald Stock and Eldon Mahoney and Carney, {Patricia (Patty)}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "691--700",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring team development in clinical care settings

AU - Stock, Ronald

AU - Mahoney, Eldon

AU - Carney, Patricia (Patty)

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Background And Objectives: Our objective was to describe the psychometric properties of a measure of team development that can be used to assess and guide team functioning in health care settings. Methods: The Team Development Measure (TDM) is a 31-item questionnaire constructed using the Rasch rating scale measurement model. We conducted an Mplus exploratory factor analysis using data collected from 1,194 individuals representing 120 different teams. Team size ranged from three to 39 members from rural and urban inpatient and ambulatory health care settings. Here we characterize the domains of teamness, while taking into account the development of teams over time. Results: The TDM was found to have good psychometric properties with little measurement error and a Rasch person reliability of 0.95. Overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.97. An Mplus exploratory factor analysis combined with the stochastic nature of the Rasch model suggests a developmental sequence in building teams consisting of four sub-domains with the following mean item difficulty scores: cohesion=40.5, standard deviation (SD)=2.68, communication= 49.3 (SD=2.78), roles and goals=52.7 (SD=2.74), and team primacy=53.3 (SD=1.06). This pattern suggests cohesiveness is an initial element for team development, followed by communication, roles and goals clarity, and team primacy. Conclusions: We developed and tested a measure of team development that has strong psychometric properties. This tool could be used to study how team functioning affects clinical outcomes and as a quality improvement tool to improve team function.

AB - Background And Objectives: Our objective was to describe the psychometric properties of a measure of team development that can be used to assess and guide team functioning in health care settings. Methods: The Team Development Measure (TDM) is a 31-item questionnaire constructed using the Rasch rating scale measurement model. We conducted an Mplus exploratory factor analysis using data collected from 1,194 individuals representing 120 different teams. Team size ranged from three to 39 members from rural and urban inpatient and ambulatory health care settings. Here we characterize the domains of teamness, while taking into account the development of teams over time. Results: The TDM was found to have good psychometric properties with little measurement error and a Rasch person reliability of 0.95. Overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.97. An Mplus exploratory factor analysis combined with the stochastic nature of the Rasch model suggests a developmental sequence in building teams consisting of four sub-domains with the following mean item difficulty scores: cohesion=40.5, standard deviation (SD)=2.68, communication= 49.3 (SD=2.78), roles and goals=52.7 (SD=2.74), and team primacy=53.3 (SD=1.06). This pattern suggests cohesiveness is an initial element for team development, followed by communication, roles and goals clarity, and team primacy. Conclusions: We developed and tested a measure of team development that has strong psychometric properties. This tool could be used to study how team functioning affects clinical outcomes and as a quality improvement tool to improve team function.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887302722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887302722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 24347186

AN - SCOPUS:84887302722

VL - 45

SP - 691

EP - 700

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 10

ER -