Measuring Preventive Care Delivery: Comparing Rates Across Three Data Sources

Steffani Bailey, John Heintzman, Miguel Marino, Megan J. Hoopes, Brigit A. Hatch, Rachel Gold, Stuart C. Cowburn, Christine A. Nelson, Heather E. Angier, Jennifer Devoe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction Preventive care delivery is an important quality outcome, and electronic data reports are being used increasingly to track these services. It is highly informative when electronic data sources are compared to information manually extracted from medical charts to assess validity and completeness. Methods This cross-sectional study used a random sample of Medicaid-insured patients seen at 43 community health centers in 2011 to calculate standard measures of correspondence between manual chart review and two automated sources (electronic health records [EHRs] and Medicaid claims), comparing documentation of orders for and receipt of ten preventive services (n=150 patients/service). Data were analyzed in 2015. Results Using manual chart review as the gold standard, automated EHR extraction showed near-perfect to perfect agreement (κ=0.96–1.0) for services received within the primary care setting (e.g., BMI, blood pressure). Receipt of breast and colorectal cancer screenings, services commonly referred out, showed moderate (κ=0.42) to substantial (κ=0.62) agreement, respectively. Automated EHR extraction showed near-perfect agreement (κ=0.83–0.97) for documentation of ordered services. Medicaid claims showed near-perfect agreement (κ=0.87) for hyperlipidemia and diabetes screening, and substantial agreement (κ=0.67–0.80) for receipt of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings, and influenza vaccination. Claims showed moderate agreement (κ=0.59) for chlamydia screening receipt. Medicaid claims did not capture ordered or unbilled services. Conclusions Findings suggest that automated EHR and claims data provide valid sources for measuring receipt of most preventive services; however, ordered and unbilled services were primarily captured via EHR data and completed referrals were more often documented in claims data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)752-761
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2016

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this