Measuring physical and psychosocial function in patients with low-back pain

Richard (Rick) Deyo, Andrew K. Diehl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

146 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Techniques for assessing daily function in Patients with back pain are generally crude and limited in scope. We therefore examined a “health status” questionnaire, the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) to assess its measurement characteristics in such patients. Eighty patients with mechanical low-back pain completed the SIP and a physical examination at a walk-in visit and again three weeks later. Test-retest reliability of the SIP was substantial. Biologic validity was confirmed by significant correlations with age, pain duration, spine flexion, straight leg raising, and pain severity. Validity of psychosocial subscales was confirmed by significant associations with patient anxiety and psychiatric problems. Scores changed in the expected directions when patients were evaluated three weeks later. The SIP is thus valid, reliable, sensitive to clinical changes, and comprehensively assesses a wide range of dysfunctions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)635-642
Number of pages8
JournalSpine
Volume8
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1983
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sickness Impact Profile
Low Back Pain
Pain
Back Pain
Reproducibility of Results
Health Status
Physical Examination
Psychiatry
Leg
Spine
Anxiety

Keywords

  • Low-back pain
  • Physical function
  • Psychosocial function

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physiology

Cite this

Measuring physical and psychosocial function in patients with low-back pain. / Deyo, Richard (Rick); Diehl, Andrew K.

In: Spine, Vol. 8, No. 6, 1983, p. 635-642.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{13b8465b448e4147aef6b1afe93a57a0,
title = "Measuring physical and psychosocial function in patients with low-back pain",
abstract = "Techniques for assessing daily function in Patients with back pain are generally crude and limited in scope. We therefore examined a “health status” questionnaire, the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) to assess its measurement characteristics in such patients. Eighty patients with mechanical low-back pain completed the SIP and a physical examination at a walk-in visit and again three weeks later. Test-retest reliability of the SIP was substantial. Biologic validity was confirmed by significant correlations with age, pain duration, spine flexion, straight leg raising, and pain severity. Validity of psychosocial subscales was confirmed by significant associations with patient anxiety and psychiatric problems. Scores changed in the expected directions when patients were evaluated three weeks later. The SIP is thus valid, reliable, sensitive to clinical changes, and comprehensively assesses a wide range of dysfunctions.",
keywords = "Low-back pain, Physical function, Psychosocial function",
author = "Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Diehl, {Andrew K.}",
year = "1983",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "635--642",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring physical and psychosocial function in patients with low-back pain

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Diehl, Andrew K.

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - Techniques for assessing daily function in Patients with back pain are generally crude and limited in scope. We therefore examined a “health status” questionnaire, the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) to assess its measurement characteristics in such patients. Eighty patients with mechanical low-back pain completed the SIP and a physical examination at a walk-in visit and again three weeks later. Test-retest reliability of the SIP was substantial. Biologic validity was confirmed by significant correlations with age, pain duration, spine flexion, straight leg raising, and pain severity. Validity of psychosocial subscales was confirmed by significant associations with patient anxiety and psychiatric problems. Scores changed in the expected directions when patients were evaluated three weeks later. The SIP is thus valid, reliable, sensitive to clinical changes, and comprehensively assesses a wide range of dysfunctions.

AB - Techniques for assessing daily function in Patients with back pain are generally crude and limited in scope. We therefore examined a “health status” questionnaire, the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) to assess its measurement characteristics in such patients. Eighty patients with mechanical low-back pain completed the SIP and a physical examination at a walk-in visit and again three weeks later. Test-retest reliability of the SIP was substantial. Biologic validity was confirmed by significant correlations with age, pain duration, spine flexion, straight leg raising, and pain severity. Validity of psychosocial subscales was confirmed by significant associations with patient anxiety and psychiatric problems. Scores changed in the expected directions when patients were evaluated three weeks later. The SIP is thus valid, reliable, sensitive to clinical changes, and comprehensively assesses a wide range of dysfunctions.

KW - Low-back pain

KW - Physical function

KW - Psychosocial function

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021060033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021060033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6228020

AN - SCOPUS:0021060033

VL - 8

SP - 635

EP - 642

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 6

ER -