Measuring outcomes

Lessons from the world of public education

Andrew Saultz, John Saultz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The quality and efficiency of American health care are increasingly measured using clinical and financial data with a goal of improving clinical practice. Proponents believe such efforts can improve outcomes, motivate clinicians, and inform the public about quality. Detractors point to problems with the accuracy of these measures and the risk of creating perverse incentives for both physicians and patients. Drawing on lessons from similar performance management policies in public education, we provide guidance about this trend for primary care physicians and health care policy makers. We argue that public school teacher evaluations that use value-added modeling foretell specific pitfalls for the use of similar models to evaluate physician effectiveness, and that unintended consequences of performance management in both education and health care can include the narrowing of purpose, deprofessionalization, and a loss of local/community control.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)71-76
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Family Medicine
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Delivery of Health Care
Education
Physicians
Primary Care Physicians
Public Policy
Health Policy
Administrative Personnel
Motivation
School Teachers

Keywords

  • Health policy
  • Metrics
  • Outcomes measurement
  • Performance management
  • Quality of health care
  • Reference standards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Measuring outcomes : Lessons from the world of public education. / Saultz, Andrew; Saultz, John.

In: Annals of Family Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 71-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c41c5bf49b174af1ac3893b4a87e8802,
title = "Measuring outcomes: Lessons from the world of public education",
abstract = "The quality and efficiency of American health care are increasingly measured using clinical and financial data with a goal of improving clinical practice. Proponents believe such efforts can improve outcomes, motivate clinicians, and inform the public about quality. Detractors point to problems with the accuracy of these measures and the risk of creating perverse incentives for both physicians and patients. Drawing on lessons from similar performance management policies in public education, we provide guidance about this trend for primary care physicians and health care policy makers. We argue that public school teacher evaluations that use value-added modeling foretell specific pitfalls for the use of similar models to evaluate physician effectiveness, and that unintended consequences of performance management in both education and health care can include the narrowing of purpose, deprofessionalization, and a loss of local/community control.",
keywords = "Health policy, Metrics, Outcomes measurement, Performance management, Quality of health care, Reference standards",
author = "Andrew Saultz and John Saultz",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1370/afm.1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "71--76",
journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",
issn = "1544-1709",
publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring outcomes

T2 - Lessons from the world of public education

AU - Saultz, Andrew

AU - Saultz, John

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - The quality and efficiency of American health care are increasingly measured using clinical and financial data with a goal of improving clinical practice. Proponents believe such efforts can improve outcomes, motivate clinicians, and inform the public about quality. Detractors point to problems with the accuracy of these measures and the risk of creating perverse incentives for both physicians and patients. Drawing on lessons from similar performance management policies in public education, we provide guidance about this trend for primary care physicians and health care policy makers. We argue that public school teacher evaluations that use value-added modeling foretell specific pitfalls for the use of similar models to evaluate physician effectiveness, and that unintended consequences of performance management in both education and health care can include the narrowing of purpose, deprofessionalization, and a loss of local/community control.

AB - The quality and efficiency of American health care are increasingly measured using clinical and financial data with a goal of improving clinical practice. Proponents believe such efforts can improve outcomes, motivate clinicians, and inform the public about quality. Detractors point to problems with the accuracy of these measures and the risk of creating perverse incentives for both physicians and patients. Drawing on lessons from similar performance management policies in public education, we provide guidance about this trend for primary care physicians and health care policy makers. We argue that public school teacher evaluations that use value-added modeling foretell specific pitfalls for the use of similar models to evaluate physician effectiveness, and that unintended consequences of performance management in both education and health care can include the narrowing of purpose, deprofessionalization, and a loss of local/community control.

KW - Health policy

KW - Metrics

KW - Outcomes measurement

KW - Performance management

KW - Quality of health care

KW - Reference standards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009204434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009204434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1370/afm.1995

DO - 10.1370/afm.1995

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 71

EP - 76

JO - Annals of Family Medicine

JF - Annals of Family Medicine

SN - 1544-1709

IS - 1

ER -