TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring intensive care nurses' perspectives on family-centered end-of-life care
T2 - Evaluation of 3 questionnaires
AU - Downey, Lois
AU - Engelberg, Ruth A.
AU - Shannon, Sarah E.
AU - Curtis, J. Randall
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - Background: Attempts to improve end-of-life care increasingly focus on family-centered care, but few validated assessment tools exist. Objectives: To evaluate 3 new short questionnaires measuring nurses' perspectives on family-centered end-of-life care in the intensive care unit and to show the usefulness of the questionnaires. Methods: Principal components analysis of data from 141 critical care nurses evaluating care given to families of 218 patients was used to develop domain scores for number of nursing activities with each family, number of barriers experienced, and nurses' satisfaction that the family's needs were met. Random effects models were used to test associations between critical care processes and outcome. Results: Nursing activities fell into 2 domains: general and culture-related communication/support. Barriers consisted of 2 domains: patient/family barriers and system/team barriers. Meeting the needs of patients' families represented a single dimension. In a path model based on domain scores, general activities had significant associations with both nurse communication and meeting families' needs; patient/family barriers, with nurse communication; and nurse and physician communication, with meeting families' needs. In a path model based on total activities and barriers scores, total activities and total barriers had significant associations with nurse communication ratings and meeting families' needs. Patients' and nurses' characteristics were not significant independent predictors of meeting the needs of patients' families. Conclusions: The 3 questionnaires provide a consistent, valid picture of nurses' perspectives on family- centered critical care and may be useful in evaluating family care processes and outcomes and in targeting areas for improvement.
AB - Background: Attempts to improve end-of-life care increasingly focus on family-centered care, but few validated assessment tools exist. Objectives: To evaluate 3 new short questionnaires measuring nurses' perspectives on family-centered end-of-life care in the intensive care unit and to show the usefulness of the questionnaires. Methods: Principal components analysis of data from 141 critical care nurses evaluating care given to families of 218 patients was used to develop domain scores for number of nursing activities with each family, number of barriers experienced, and nurses' satisfaction that the family's needs were met. Random effects models were used to test associations between critical care processes and outcome. Results: Nursing activities fell into 2 domains: general and culture-related communication/support. Barriers consisted of 2 domains: patient/family barriers and system/team barriers. Meeting the needs of patients' families represented a single dimension. In a path model based on domain scores, general activities had significant associations with both nurse communication and meeting families' needs; patient/family barriers, with nurse communication; and nurse and physician communication, with meeting families' needs. In a path model based on total activities and barriers scores, total activities and total barriers had significant associations with nurse communication ratings and meeting families' needs. Patients' and nurses' characteristics were not significant independent predictors of meeting the needs of patients' families. Conclusions: The 3 questionnaires provide a consistent, valid picture of nurses' perspectives on family- centered critical care and may be useful in evaluating family care processes and outcomes and in targeting areas for improvement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548099367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548099367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 17053264
AN - SCOPUS:34548099367
SN - 1062-3264
VL - 15
SP - 568
EP - 579
JO - American Journal of Critical Care
JF - American Journal of Critical Care
IS - 6
ER -