Measuring intensive care nurses' perspectives on family-centered end-of-life care: Evaluation of 3 questionnaires

Lois Downey, Ruth A. Engelberg, Sarah Shannon, J. Randall Curtis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Attempts to improve end-of-life care increasingly focus on family-centered care, but few validated assessment tools exist. Objectives: To evaluate 3 new short questionnaires measuring nurses' perspectives on family-centered end-of-life care in the intensive care unit and to show the usefulness of the questionnaires. Methods: Principal components analysis of data from 141 critical care nurses evaluating care given to families of 218 patients was used to develop domain scores for number of nursing activities with each family, number of barriers experienced, and nurses' satisfaction that the family's needs were met. Random effects models were used to test associations between critical care processes and outcome. Results: Nursing activities fell into 2 domains: general and culture-related communication/support. Barriers consisted of 2 domains: patient/family barriers and system/team barriers. Meeting the needs of patients' families represented a single dimension. In a path model based on domain scores, general activities had significant associations with both nurse communication and meeting families' needs; patient/family barriers, with nurse communication; and nurse and physician communication, with meeting families' needs. In a path model based on total activities and barriers scores, total activities and total barriers had significant associations with nurse communication ratings and meeting families' needs. Patients' and nurses' characteristics were not significant independent predictors of meeting the needs of patients' families. Conclusions: The 3 questionnaires provide a consistent, valid picture of nurses' perspectives on family- centered critical care and may be useful in evaluating family care processes and outcomes and in targeting areas for improvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)568-579
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Critical Care
Volume15
Issue number6
StatePublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Terminal Care
Critical Care
Nurses
Communication
Surveys and Questionnaires
Nursing
Principal Component Analysis
Intensive Care Units

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care
  • Medicine(all)
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Measuring intensive care nurses' perspectives on family-centered end-of-life care : Evaluation of 3 questionnaires. / Downey, Lois; Engelberg, Ruth A.; Shannon, Sarah; Curtis, J. Randall.

In: American Journal of Critical Care, Vol. 15, No. 6, 2006, p. 568-579.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Downey, Lois ; Engelberg, Ruth A. ; Shannon, Sarah ; Curtis, J. Randall. / Measuring intensive care nurses' perspectives on family-centered end-of-life care : Evaluation of 3 questionnaires. In: American Journal of Critical Care. 2006 ; Vol. 15, No. 6. pp. 568-579.
@article{79eca3148bc5460c9af8d72a53e5acca,
title = "Measuring intensive care nurses' perspectives on family-centered end-of-life care: Evaluation of 3 questionnaires",
abstract = "Background: Attempts to improve end-of-life care increasingly focus on family-centered care, but few validated assessment tools exist. Objectives: To evaluate 3 new short questionnaires measuring nurses' perspectives on family-centered end-of-life care in the intensive care unit and to show the usefulness of the questionnaires. Methods: Principal components analysis of data from 141 critical care nurses evaluating care given to families of 218 patients was used to develop domain scores for number of nursing activities with each family, number of barriers experienced, and nurses' satisfaction that the family's needs were met. Random effects models were used to test associations between critical care processes and outcome. Results: Nursing activities fell into 2 domains: general and culture-related communication/support. Barriers consisted of 2 domains: patient/family barriers and system/team barriers. Meeting the needs of patients' families represented a single dimension. In a path model based on domain scores, general activities had significant associations with both nurse communication and meeting families' needs; patient/family barriers, with nurse communication; and nurse and physician communication, with meeting families' needs. In a path model based on total activities and barriers scores, total activities and total barriers had significant associations with nurse communication ratings and meeting families' needs. Patients' and nurses' characteristics were not significant independent predictors of meeting the needs of patients' families. Conclusions: The 3 questionnaires provide a consistent, valid picture of nurses' perspectives on family- centered critical care and may be useful in evaluating family care processes and outcomes and in targeting areas for improvement.",
author = "Lois Downey and Engelberg, {Ruth A.} and Sarah Shannon and Curtis, {J. Randall}",
year = "2006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "568--579",
journal = "American Journal of Critical Care",
issn = "1062-3264",
publisher = "American Association of Critical Care Nurses",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring intensive care nurses' perspectives on family-centered end-of-life care

T2 - Evaluation of 3 questionnaires

AU - Downey, Lois

AU - Engelberg, Ruth A.

AU - Shannon, Sarah

AU - Curtis, J. Randall

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Background: Attempts to improve end-of-life care increasingly focus on family-centered care, but few validated assessment tools exist. Objectives: To evaluate 3 new short questionnaires measuring nurses' perspectives on family-centered end-of-life care in the intensive care unit and to show the usefulness of the questionnaires. Methods: Principal components analysis of data from 141 critical care nurses evaluating care given to families of 218 patients was used to develop domain scores for number of nursing activities with each family, number of barriers experienced, and nurses' satisfaction that the family's needs were met. Random effects models were used to test associations between critical care processes and outcome. Results: Nursing activities fell into 2 domains: general and culture-related communication/support. Barriers consisted of 2 domains: patient/family barriers and system/team barriers. Meeting the needs of patients' families represented a single dimension. In a path model based on domain scores, general activities had significant associations with both nurse communication and meeting families' needs; patient/family barriers, with nurse communication; and nurse and physician communication, with meeting families' needs. In a path model based on total activities and barriers scores, total activities and total barriers had significant associations with nurse communication ratings and meeting families' needs. Patients' and nurses' characteristics were not significant independent predictors of meeting the needs of patients' families. Conclusions: The 3 questionnaires provide a consistent, valid picture of nurses' perspectives on family- centered critical care and may be useful in evaluating family care processes and outcomes and in targeting areas for improvement.

AB - Background: Attempts to improve end-of-life care increasingly focus on family-centered care, but few validated assessment tools exist. Objectives: To evaluate 3 new short questionnaires measuring nurses' perspectives on family-centered end-of-life care in the intensive care unit and to show the usefulness of the questionnaires. Methods: Principal components analysis of data from 141 critical care nurses evaluating care given to families of 218 patients was used to develop domain scores for number of nursing activities with each family, number of barriers experienced, and nurses' satisfaction that the family's needs were met. Random effects models were used to test associations between critical care processes and outcome. Results: Nursing activities fell into 2 domains: general and culture-related communication/support. Barriers consisted of 2 domains: patient/family barriers and system/team barriers. Meeting the needs of patients' families represented a single dimension. In a path model based on domain scores, general activities had significant associations with both nurse communication and meeting families' needs; patient/family barriers, with nurse communication; and nurse and physician communication, with meeting families' needs. In a path model based on total activities and barriers scores, total activities and total barriers had significant associations with nurse communication ratings and meeting families' needs. Patients' and nurses' characteristics were not significant independent predictors of meeting the needs of patients' families. Conclusions: The 3 questionnaires provide a consistent, valid picture of nurses' perspectives on family- centered critical care and may be useful in evaluating family care processes and outcomes and in targeting areas for improvement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548099367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548099367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 17053264

AN - SCOPUS:34548099367

VL - 15

SP - 568

EP - 579

JO - American Journal of Critical Care

JF - American Journal of Critical Care

SN - 1062-3264

IS - 6

ER -