Measuring health-related quality of life for persons with mobility impairments: An enabled version of the short-form 36 (SF-36E)

Katherine Froehlich-Grobe, Elena Andresen, Charlene Caburnay, Glen W. White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Examine psychometric properties of the SF-36 and SF-36E for mobility-impaired individuals and assess whether the SF-36E yields higher health-related quality-of-life scores. Methods: We altered the SF-36 Physical Function scale by substituting the word "go" for "walk" and "climb" and changed the stem to reflect function using assistive devices. We compared responses between versions for 201 individuals with disabilities (n = 95 wheelchair users, n = 48 other device users, 58 = no device users). Results: Both surveys yielded reliable scores, but floor and ceiling effects occurred with both versions. Confirmatory factor analyses demonstrate good fit for the SF-36 and SF36E, but were compromised by low sample size. Respondents demonstrated significantly better Role Physical, Bodily Pain, and Vitality on the SF-36E, but worse General Health. Conclusions: The World Health Organization framework, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) suggests that it is important to know both what one can do without assistance (capacity) and what one can do with assistance (performance). Results suggest that the SF-36E successfully measures performance among mobility-impaired individuals, including wheelchair users. However, further validation studies of the SF-36 and SF-36E are warranted with samples of individuals with disabilities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)751-770
Number of pages20
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Wheelchairs
Quality of Life
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
Self-Help Devices
Equipment and Supplies
Validation Studies
Psychometrics
Sample Size
Statistical Factor Analysis
Pain
Health
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Bias
  • Disabled persons
  • Health status
  • Health surveys
  • Quality of life
  • Reproducibility of results
  • SF-36

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Measuring health-related quality of life for persons with mobility impairments : An enabled version of the short-form 36 (SF-36E). / Froehlich-Grobe, Katherine; Andresen, Elena; Caburnay, Charlene; White, Glen W.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 17, No. 5, 06.2008, p. 751-770.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bc642b0390464a8c910b849c0d9ef381,
title = "Measuring health-related quality of life for persons with mobility impairments: An enabled version of the short-form 36 (SF-36E)",
abstract = "Objective: Examine psychometric properties of the SF-36 and SF-36E for mobility-impaired individuals and assess whether the SF-36E yields higher health-related quality-of-life scores. Methods: We altered the SF-36 Physical Function scale by substituting the word {"}go{"} for {"}walk{"} and {"}climb{"} and changed the stem to reflect function using assistive devices. We compared responses between versions for 201 individuals with disabilities (n = 95 wheelchair users, n = 48 other device users, 58 = no device users). Results: Both surveys yielded reliable scores, but floor and ceiling effects occurred with both versions. Confirmatory factor analyses demonstrate good fit for the SF-36 and SF36E, but were compromised by low sample size. Respondents demonstrated significantly better Role Physical, Bodily Pain, and Vitality on the SF-36E, but worse General Health. Conclusions: The World Health Organization framework, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) suggests that it is important to know both what one can do without assistance (capacity) and what one can do with assistance (performance). Results suggest that the SF-36E successfully measures performance among mobility-impaired individuals, including wheelchair users. However, further validation studies of the SF-36 and SF-36E are warranted with samples of individuals with disabilities.",
keywords = "Bias, Disabled persons, Health status, Health surveys, Quality of life, Reproducibility of results, SF-36",
author = "Katherine Froehlich-Grobe and Elena Andresen and Charlene Caburnay and White, {Glen W.}",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s11136-008-9342-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "751--770",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring health-related quality of life for persons with mobility impairments

T2 - An enabled version of the short-form 36 (SF-36E)

AU - Froehlich-Grobe, Katherine

AU - Andresen, Elena

AU - Caburnay, Charlene

AU - White, Glen W.

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Objective: Examine psychometric properties of the SF-36 and SF-36E for mobility-impaired individuals and assess whether the SF-36E yields higher health-related quality-of-life scores. Methods: We altered the SF-36 Physical Function scale by substituting the word "go" for "walk" and "climb" and changed the stem to reflect function using assistive devices. We compared responses between versions for 201 individuals with disabilities (n = 95 wheelchair users, n = 48 other device users, 58 = no device users). Results: Both surveys yielded reliable scores, but floor and ceiling effects occurred with both versions. Confirmatory factor analyses demonstrate good fit for the SF-36 and SF36E, but were compromised by low sample size. Respondents demonstrated significantly better Role Physical, Bodily Pain, and Vitality on the SF-36E, but worse General Health. Conclusions: The World Health Organization framework, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) suggests that it is important to know both what one can do without assistance (capacity) and what one can do with assistance (performance). Results suggest that the SF-36E successfully measures performance among mobility-impaired individuals, including wheelchair users. However, further validation studies of the SF-36 and SF-36E are warranted with samples of individuals with disabilities.

AB - Objective: Examine psychometric properties of the SF-36 and SF-36E for mobility-impaired individuals and assess whether the SF-36E yields higher health-related quality-of-life scores. Methods: We altered the SF-36 Physical Function scale by substituting the word "go" for "walk" and "climb" and changed the stem to reflect function using assistive devices. We compared responses between versions for 201 individuals with disabilities (n = 95 wheelchair users, n = 48 other device users, 58 = no device users). Results: Both surveys yielded reliable scores, but floor and ceiling effects occurred with both versions. Confirmatory factor analyses demonstrate good fit for the SF-36 and SF36E, but were compromised by low sample size. Respondents demonstrated significantly better Role Physical, Bodily Pain, and Vitality on the SF-36E, but worse General Health. Conclusions: The World Health Organization framework, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) suggests that it is important to know both what one can do without assistance (capacity) and what one can do with assistance (performance). Results suggest that the SF-36E successfully measures performance among mobility-impaired individuals, including wheelchair users. However, further validation studies of the SF-36 and SF-36E are warranted with samples of individuals with disabilities.

KW - Bias

KW - Disabled persons

KW - Health status

KW - Health surveys

KW - Quality of life

KW - Reproducibility of results

KW - SF-36

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49949152495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49949152495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-008-9342-5

DO - 10.1007/s11136-008-9342-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 18427950

AN - SCOPUS:49949152495

VL - 17

SP - 751

EP - 770

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 5

ER -