Measures of short-term test-retest reliability of computerized neurobehavioral tests

Fayssal M. Farahat, Diane Rohlman, Daniel Storzbach, Tammara Ammerman, Wyndham Anger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Neurobehavioral test batteries are often administered repeatedly to evaluate changes over time or effects of clinical interventions or neurotoxic exposures. Time intervals between test sessions range from very short (hours) to very long (decades). The aim of this study was to compare the impact of two brief time intervals on the test-retest reliability of frequently used neurobehavioral tests. Fifty healthy adults were recruited through newspaper advertisements in Portland, Oregon. Participants were divided into either a 6 h (same-day) or 1-week retest group. All participants completed a battery of tests from the computerized Behavioral Assessment and Research System (BARS). Reliability was assessed by Pearson product-moment correlation and by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The test battery generally showed adequate reliability in the short-term (week) and very short-term (day) and stability in performance over repeated administration when examined by multiple measures. Intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.35 to 0.85. The magnitude of variation of performance in the administered tests was equally distributed around zero (i.e. no difference). The findings suggest that neurobehavioral tests such as BARS may be a useful tool for the assessment of acute exposures and clinical status where short-term evaluation is required (e.g. in the same-day or within 1 week).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)513-521
Number of pages9
JournalNeuroToxicology
Volume24
Issue number4-5
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2003

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Behavioral Research
Newspapers
Byproducts

Keywords

  • Computerized battery
  • Short-term
  • Test-retest

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Toxicology

Cite this

Measures of short-term test-retest reliability of computerized neurobehavioral tests. / Farahat, Fayssal M.; Rohlman, Diane; Storzbach, Daniel; Ammerman, Tammara; Anger, Wyndham.

In: NeuroToxicology, Vol. 24, No. 4-5, 08.2003, p. 513-521.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Farahat, Fayssal M. ; Rohlman, Diane ; Storzbach, Daniel ; Ammerman, Tammara ; Anger, Wyndham. / Measures of short-term test-retest reliability of computerized neurobehavioral tests. In: NeuroToxicology. 2003 ; Vol. 24, No. 4-5. pp. 513-521.
@article{9db9c9aa89f34e9f80869f2546839f07,
title = "Measures of short-term test-retest reliability of computerized neurobehavioral tests",
abstract = "Neurobehavioral test batteries are often administered repeatedly to evaluate changes over time or effects of clinical interventions or neurotoxic exposures. Time intervals between test sessions range from very short (hours) to very long (decades). The aim of this study was to compare the impact of two brief time intervals on the test-retest reliability of frequently used neurobehavioral tests. Fifty healthy adults were recruited through newspaper advertisements in Portland, Oregon. Participants were divided into either a 6 h (same-day) or 1-week retest group. All participants completed a battery of tests from the computerized Behavioral Assessment and Research System (BARS). Reliability was assessed by Pearson product-moment correlation and by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The test battery generally showed adequate reliability in the short-term (week) and very short-term (day) and stability in performance over repeated administration when examined by multiple measures. Intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.35 to 0.85. The magnitude of variation of performance in the administered tests was equally distributed around zero (i.e. no difference). The findings suggest that neurobehavioral tests such as BARS may be a useful tool for the assessment of acute exposures and clinical status where short-term evaluation is required (e.g. in the same-day or within 1 week).",
keywords = "Computerized battery, Short-term, Test-retest",
author = "Farahat, {Fayssal M.} and Diane Rohlman and Daniel Storzbach and Tammara Ammerman and Wyndham Anger",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/S0161-813X(03)00079-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "513--521",
journal = "NeuroToxicology",
issn = "0161-813X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4-5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measures of short-term test-retest reliability of computerized neurobehavioral tests

AU - Farahat, Fayssal M.

AU - Rohlman, Diane

AU - Storzbach, Daniel

AU - Ammerman, Tammara

AU - Anger, Wyndham

PY - 2003/8

Y1 - 2003/8

N2 - Neurobehavioral test batteries are often administered repeatedly to evaluate changes over time or effects of clinical interventions or neurotoxic exposures. Time intervals between test sessions range from very short (hours) to very long (decades). The aim of this study was to compare the impact of two brief time intervals on the test-retest reliability of frequently used neurobehavioral tests. Fifty healthy adults were recruited through newspaper advertisements in Portland, Oregon. Participants were divided into either a 6 h (same-day) or 1-week retest group. All participants completed a battery of tests from the computerized Behavioral Assessment and Research System (BARS). Reliability was assessed by Pearson product-moment correlation and by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The test battery generally showed adequate reliability in the short-term (week) and very short-term (day) and stability in performance over repeated administration when examined by multiple measures. Intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.35 to 0.85. The magnitude of variation of performance in the administered tests was equally distributed around zero (i.e. no difference). The findings suggest that neurobehavioral tests such as BARS may be a useful tool for the assessment of acute exposures and clinical status where short-term evaluation is required (e.g. in the same-day or within 1 week).

AB - Neurobehavioral test batteries are often administered repeatedly to evaluate changes over time or effects of clinical interventions or neurotoxic exposures. Time intervals between test sessions range from very short (hours) to very long (decades). The aim of this study was to compare the impact of two brief time intervals on the test-retest reliability of frequently used neurobehavioral tests. Fifty healthy adults were recruited through newspaper advertisements in Portland, Oregon. Participants were divided into either a 6 h (same-day) or 1-week retest group. All participants completed a battery of tests from the computerized Behavioral Assessment and Research System (BARS). Reliability was assessed by Pearson product-moment correlation and by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The test battery generally showed adequate reliability in the short-term (week) and very short-term (day) and stability in performance over repeated administration when examined by multiple measures. Intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.35 to 0.85. The magnitude of variation of performance in the administered tests was equally distributed around zero (i.e. no difference). The findings suggest that neurobehavioral tests such as BARS may be a useful tool for the assessment of acute exposures and clinical status where short-term evaluation is required (e.g. in the same-day or within 1 week).

KW - Computerized battery

KW - Short-term

KW - Test-retest

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042154103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042154103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0161-813X(03)00079-2

DO - 10.1016/S0161-813X(03)00079-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 12900064

AN - SCOPUS:0042154103

VL - 24

SP - 513

EP - 521

JO - NeuroToxicology

JF - NeuroToxicology

SN - 0161-813X

IS - 4-5

ER -