Meaningful use's benefits and burdens for US family physicians

G. Talley Holman, Steven E. Waldren, John WBeasley, Deborah Cohen, Lawrence D. Dardick, Chester H. Fox, Jenna Marquard, Ryan Mullins, Charles Q. North, Matt Rafalski, A. Joy Rivera, Tosha B. Wetterneck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. The federal meaningful use (MU) program was aimed at improving adoption and use of electronic health records, but practicing physicians have criticized it. This study was aimed at quantifying the benefits (ie, usefulness) and burdens (ie, workload) of the MU program for practicing family physicians. Materials and Methods. An interdisciplinary national panel of experts (physicians and engineers) identified the work associated with MU criteria during patient encounters. They conducted a national survey to assess each criterion's level of patient benefit and compliance burden. Results. In 2015, 480 US family physicians responded to the survey. Their demographics were comparable to US norms. Eighteen of 31 MU criteria were perceived as useful for more than half of patient encounters, with 13 of those being useful for more than two-thirds. Thirteen criteria were useful for less than half of patient encounters. Four useful criteria were reported as having a high compliance burden. Discussion. There was high variability in physicians' perceived benefits and burdens of MU criteria. MU Stage 1 criteria, which are more related to basic/routine care, were perceived as beneficial by most physicians. Stage 2 criteria, which are more related to complex and population care, were perceived as less beneficial and more burdensome to comply with. Conclusion. MU was discontinued, but the merit-based incentive payment system within the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 adopted its criteria. For many physicians, MU created a significant practice burden without clear benefits to patient care. This study suggests that policymakers should not assess MU in aggregate, but as individual criteria for open discussion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)694-701
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

Family Physicians
Physicians
Electronic Health Records
Patient Compliance
Workload
Compliance
Motivation
Patient Care
Demography
Population
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Benefit
  • Burden
  • Meaningful use
  • National panel
  • Policy
  • Primary care physician

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Holman, G. T., Waldren, S. E., WBeasley, J., Cohen, D., Dardick, L. D., Fox, C. H., ... Wetterneck, T. B. (2018). Meaningful use's benefits and burdens for US family physicians. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25(6), 694-701. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx158

Meaningful use's benefits and burdens for US family physicians. / Holman, G. Talley; Waldren, Steven E.; WBeasley, John; Cohen, Deborah; Dardick, Lawrence D.; Fox, Chester H.; Marquard, Jenna; Mullins, Ryan; North, Charles Q.; Rafalski, Matt; Rivera, A. Joy; Wetterneck, Tosha B.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 25, No. 6, 01.06.2018, p. 694-701.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holman, GT, Waldren, SE, WBeasley, J, Cohen, D, Dardick, LD, Fox, CH, Marquard, J, Mullins, R, North, CQ, Rafalski, M, Rivera, AJ & Wetterneck, TB 2018, 'Meaningful use's benefits and burdens for US family physicians', Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 694-701. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx158
Holman, G. Talley ; Waldren, Steven E. ; WBeasley, John ; Cohen, Deborah ; Dardick, Lawrence D. ; Fox, Chester H. ; Marquard, Jenna ; Mullins, Ryan ; North, Charles Q. ; Rafalski, Matt ; Rivera, A. Joy ; Wetterneck, Tosha B. / Meaningful use's benefits and burdens for US family physicians. In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2018 ; Vol. 25, No. 6. pp. 694-701.
@article{a743e82243824317931d6a163e4dc8c5,
title = "Meaningful use's benefits and burdens for US family physicians",
abstract = "Objective. The federal meaningful use (MU) program was aimed at improving adoption and use of electronic health records, but practicing physicians have criticized it. This study was aimed at quantifying the benefits (ie, usefulness) and burdens (ie, workload) of the MU program for practicing family physicians. Materials and Methods. An interdisciplinary national panel of experts (physicians and engineers) identified the work associated with MU criteria during patient encounters. They conducted a national survey to assess each criterion's level of patient benefit and compliance burden. Results. In 2015, 480 US family physicians responded to the survey. Their demographics were comparable to US norms. Eighteen of 31 MU criteria were perceived as useful for more than half of patient encounters, with 13 of those being useful for more than two-thirds. Thirteen criteria were useful for less than half of patient encounters. Four useful criteria were reported as having a high compliance burden. Discussion. There was high variability in physicians' perceived benefits and burdens of MU criteria. MU Stage 1 criteria, which are more related to basic/routine care, were perceived as beneficial by most physicians. Stage 2 criteria, which are more related to complex and population care, were perceived as less beneficial and more burdensome to comply with. Conclusion. MU was discontinued, but the merit-based incentive payment system within the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 adopted its criteria. For many physicians, MU created a significant practice burden without clear benefits to patient care. This study suggests that policymakers should not assess MU in aggregate, but as individual criteria for open discussion.",
keywords = "Benefit, Burden, Meaningful use, National panel, Policy, Primary care physician",
author = "Holman, {G. Talley} and Waldren, {Steven E.} and John WBeasley and Deborah Cohen and Dardick, {Lawrence D.} and Fox, {Chester H.} and Jenna Marquard and Ryan Mullins and North, {Charles Q.} and Matt Rafalski and Rivera, {A. Joy} and Wetterneck, {Tosha B.}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jamia/ocx158",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "694--701",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meaningful use's benefits and burdens for US family physicians

AU - Holman, G. Talley

AU - Waldren, Steven E.

AU - WBeasley, John

AU - Cohen, Deborah

AU - Dardick, Lawrence D.

AU - Fox, Chester H.

AU - Marquard, Jenna

AU - Mullins, Ryan

AU - North, Charles Q.

AU - Rafalski, Matt

AU - Rivera, A. Joy

AU - Wetterneck, Tosha B.

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - Objective. The federal meaningful use (MU) program was aimed at improving adoption and use of electronic health records, but practicing physicians have criticized it. This study was aimed at quantifying the benefits (ie, usefulness) and burdens (ie, workload) of the MU program for practicing family physicians. Materials and Methods. An interdisciplinary national panel of experts (physicians and engineers) identified the work associated with MU criteria during patient encounters. They conducted a national survey to assess each criterion's level of patient benefit and compliance burden. Results. In 2015, 480 US family physicians responded to the survey. Their demographics were comparable to US norms. Eighteen of 31 MU criteria were perceived as useful for more than half of patient encounters, with 13 of those being useful for more than two-thirds. Thirteen criteria were useful for less than half of patient encounters. Four useful criteria were reported as having a high compliance burden. Discussion. There was high variability in physicians' perceived benefits and burdens of MU criteria. MU Stage 1 criteria, which are more related to basic/routine care, were perceived as beneficial by most physicians. Stage 2 criteria, which are more related to complex and population care, were perceived as less beneficial and more burdensome to comply with. Conclusion. MU was discontinued, but the merit-based incentive payment system within the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 adopted its criteria. For many physicians, MU created a significant practice burden without clear benefits to patient care. This study suggests that policymakers should not assess MU in aggregate, but as individual criteria for open discussion.

AB - Objective. The federal meaningful use (MU) program was aimed at improving adoption and use of electronic health records, but practicing physicians have criticized it. This study was aimed at quantifying the benefits (ie, usefulness) and burdens (ie, workload) of the MU program for practicing family physicians. Materials and Methods. An interdisciplinary national panel of experts (physicians and engineers) identified the work associated with MU criteria during patient encounters. They conducted a national survey to assess each criterion's level of patient benefit and compliance burden. Results. In 2015, 480 US family physicians responded to the survey. Their demographics were comparable to US norms. Eighteen of 31 MU criteria were perceived as useful for more than half of patient encounters, with 13 of those being useful for more than two-thirds. Thirteen criteria were useful for less than half of patient encounters. Four useful criteria were reported as having a high compliance burden. Discussion. There was high variability in physicians' perceived benefits and burdens of MU criteria. MU Stage 1 criteria, which are more related to basic/routine care, were perceived as beneficial by most physicians. Stage 2 criteria, which are more related to complex and population care, were perceived as less beneficial and more burdensome to comply with. Conclusion. MU was discontinued, but the merit-based incentive payment system within the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 adopted its criteria. For many physicians, MU created a significant practice burden without clear benefits to patient care. This study suggests that policymakers should not assess MU in aggregate, but as individual criteria for open discussion.

KW - Benefit

KW - Burden

KW - Meaningful use

KW - National panel

KW - Policy

KW - Primary care physician

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048571600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048571600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jamia/ocx158

DO - 10.1093/jamia/ocx158

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048571600

VL - 25

SP - 694

EP - 701

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 6

ER -