Management practices and the quality of care in cardiac units

Kenneth (John) McConnell, Richard C. Lindrooth, Douglas R. Wholey, Thomas M. Maddox, Nick Bloom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Scopus citations


Importance: To improve the quality of health care, many researchers have suggested that health care institutions adopt management approaches that have been successful in the manufacturing and technology sectors. However, relatively little information exists about how these practices are disseminated in hospitals and whether they are associated with better performance. Objectives: To describe the variation in management practices among a large sample of hospital cardiac care units; assess association of these practices with processes of care, readmissions, and mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI); and suggest specific directions for the testing and dissemination of health care management approaches. Design: We adapted an approach used to measure management and organizational practices in manufacturing to collect management data on cardiac units. We scored performance in 18 practices using the following 4 dimensions: standardizing care, tracking of key performance indicators, setting targets, and incentivizing employees. We used multivariate analyses to assess the relationship of management practices with process-ofcare measures, 30-day risk-adjusted mortality, and 30- day readmissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Setting: Cardiac units in US hospitals. Participants: Five hundred ninety-seven cardiac units, representing 51.5% of hospitals with interventional cardiac catheterization laboratories and at least 25 annual AMI discharges. Main Outcome Measures: Process-of-care measures, 30-day risk-adjusted mortality, and 30-day readmissions for AMI. Results: We found a wide distribution in management practices, with fewer than 20% of hospitals scoring a 4 or a 5 (best practice) on more than 9 measures. In multivariate analyses, management practices were significantly correlated with mortality (P=.01) and 6 of 6 process measures (P

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)684-692
Number of pages9
JournalJAMA Internal Medicine
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - Apr 22 2013


ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this