Management of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Does endoscopy influence medical management?

Kenneth K. Ellis, Megan Oehlke, Mark Helfand, David Lieberman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the theories that underlie the clinical decision to perform endoscopy in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Physicians reported that they use endoscopic findings to modify medical treatment of GERD. This study was undertaken to test this hypothesis in clinical practice. Methods: A consortium of community specialists in gastrointestinal disease was formed. Physicians completed a database on patients undergoing elective endoscopy for symptoms of GERD, which includes symptom severity, endoscopic findings, and medical treatment before and after endoscopy. An increase in medical treatment was defined as an increase in acid suppression therapy, and/or the addition of a promotility drug, and/or referral for surgery. Results: Data were collected prospectively over 6 months on 664 patients with symptoms of GERD, and complete data were available on 598 patients. Barrett's esophagus or active esophagitis (erythema, erosions, or ulceration) was present in 374 patients. Of these patients, 74% had an increase in therapy after endoscopy; for only 5% did therapy decrease. In contrast, among 224 patients with a normal-appearing esophagus, 35% had an increase in treatment and 65% had either a decrease in treatment or no change. In most cases, the increase in treatment was due to persistence of symptoms or because of endoscopic findings in the stomach or duodenum. The differences in treatment changes between the two groups was highly significant (p <0.0001). Conclusion: The results support the theory that physicians often use endoscopic results to tailor medical therapy in patients with symptoms of GERD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1472-1474
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume92
Issue number9
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Gastroesophageal Reflux
Endoscopy
Therapeutics
Physicians
Barrett Esophagus
Esophagitis
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Erythema
Duodenum
Esophagus
Stomach
Referral and Consultation
Databases
Acids

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Management of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease : Does endoscopy influence medical management? / Ellis, Kenneth K.; Oehlke, Megan; Helfand, Mark; Lieberman, David.

In: American Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 92, No. 9, 1997, p. 1472-1474.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b3655eab167047c781a7efdb1d47cd77,
title = "Management of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Does endoscopy influence medical management?",
abstract = "Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the theories that underlie the clinical decision to perform endoscopy in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Physicians reported that they use endoscopic findings to modify medical treatment of GERD. This study was undertaken to test this hypothesis in clinical practice. Methods: A consortium of community specialists in gastrointestinal disease was formed. Physicians completed a database on patients undergoing elective endoscopy for symptoms of GERD, which includes symptom severity, endoscopic findings, and medical treatment before and after endoscopy. An increase in medical treatment was defined as an increase in acid suppression therapy, and/or the addition of a promotility drug, and/or referral for surgery. Results: Data were collected prospectively over 6 months on 664 patients with symptoms of GERD, and complete data were available on 598 patients. Barrett's esophagus or active esophagitis (erythema, erosions, or ulceration) was present in 374 patients. Of these patients, 74{\%} had an increase in therapy after endoscopy; for only 5{\%} did therapy decrease. In contrast, among 224 patients with a normal-appearing esophagus, 35{\%} had an increase in treatment and 65{\%} had either a decrease in treatment or no change. In most cases, the increase in treatment was due to persistence of symptoms or because of endoscopic findings in the stomach or duodenum. The differences in treatment changes between the two groups was highly significant (p <0.0001). Conclusion: The results support the theory that physicians often use endoscopic results to tailor medical therapy in patients with symptoms of GERD.",
author = "Ellis, {Kenneth K.} and Megan Oehlke and Mark Helfand and David Lieberman",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "1472--1474",
journal = "American Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "0002-9270",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease

T2 - Does endoscopy influence medical management?

AU - Ellis, Kenneth K.

AU - Oehlke, Megan

AU - Helfand, Mark

AU - Lieberman, David

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the theories that underlie the clinical decision to perform endoscopy in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Physicians reported that they use endoscopic findings to modify medical treatment of GERD. This study was undertaken to test this hypothesis in clinical practice. Methods: A consortium of community specialists in gastrointestinal disease was formed. Physicians completed a database on patients undergoing elective endoscopy for symptoms of GERD, which includes symptom severity, endoscopic findings, and medical treatment before and after endoscopy. An increase in medical treatment was defined as an increase in acid suppression therapy, and/or the addition of a promotility drug, and/or referral for surgery. Results: Data were collected prospectively over 6 months on 664 patients with symptoms of GERD, and complete data were available on 598 patients. Barrett's esophagus or active esophagitis (erythema, erosions, or ulceration) was present in 374 patients. Of these patients, 74% had an increase in therapy after endoscopy; for only 5% did therapy decrease. In contrast, among 224 patients with a normal-appearing esophagus, 35% had an increase in treatment and 65% had either a decrease in treatment or no change. In most cases, the increase in treatment was due to persistence of symptoms or because of endoscopic findings in the stomach or duodenum. The differences in treatment changes between the two groups was highly significant (p <0.0001). Conclusion: The results support the theory that physicians often use endoscopic results to tailor medical therapy in patients with symptoms of GERD.

AB - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the theories that underlie the clinical decision to perform endoscopy in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Physicians reported that they use endoscopic findings to modify medical treatment of GERD. This study was undertaken to test this hypothesis in clinical practice. Methods: A consortium of community specialists in gastrointestinal disease was formed. Physicians completed a database on patients undergoing elective endoscopy for symptoms of GERD, which includes symptom severity, endoscopic findings, and medical treatment before and after endoscopy. An increase in medical treatment was defined as an increase in acid suppression therapy, and/or the addition of a promotility drug, and/or referral for surgery. Results: Data were collected prospectively over 6 months on 664 patients with symptoms of GERD, and complete data were available on 598 patients. Barrett's esophagus or active esophagitis (erythema, erosions, or ulceration) was present in 374 patients. Of these patients, 74% had an increase in therapy after endoscopy; for only 5% did therapy decrease. In contrast, among 224 patients with a normal-appearing esophagus, 35% had an increase in treatment and 65% had either a decrease in treatment or no change. In most cases, the increase in treatment was due to persistence of symptoms or because of endoscopic findings in the stomach or duodenum. The differences in treatment changes between the two groups was highly significant (p <0.0001). Conclusion: The results support the theory that physicians often use endoscopic results to tailor medical therapy in patients with symptoms of GERD.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030851092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030851092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9317065

AN - SCOPUS:0030851092

VL - 92

SP - 1472

EP - 1474

JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 0002-9270

IS - 9

ER -