Management of penetrating colon trauma: A cost-utility analysis

Karen Brasel, David C. Borgstrom, John A. Weigelt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Management of penetrating colon injuries in the presence of multiple associated risk factors is controversial. Issues not considered in previous management strategies are patient perception of quality of life with a colostomy and the true cost of each therapeutic option, which includes colostomy supplies and costs of colostomy takedown. To evaluate these issues, we performed a cost-utility analysis. Methods. We constructed a decision tree with 3 options: primary repair, resection and anastomosis, and colostomy. Chance and decision nodes on each decision branch represent injury severity, complications, colostomy takedown, and death. Chance node frequencies and utility assignments were taken from published data. We obtained actual costs for all components of perioperative care. The outcomes reported are cost and quality of life. Results. Colostomy has the least quality of life and the greatest cost. Primary repair and resection each dominate colostomy in the baseline analysis. No variable significantly altered these conclusions in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions. Simple suture or resection and anastomosis at the time of initial exploration is the dominant management method for penetrating colon trauma. It also demonstrates the trade-off between cost and life expectancy of the 3 management options.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)471-479
Number of pages9
JournalSurgery
Volume125
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colostomy
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Colon
Costs and Cost Analysis
Wounds and Injuries
Quality of Life
Perioperative Care
Decision Trees
Life Expectancy
Sutures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Management of penetrating colon trauma : A cost-utility analysis. / Brasel, Karen; Borgstrom, David C.; Weigelt, John A.

In: Surgery, Vol. 125, No. 5, 1999, p. 471-479.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brasel, Karen ; Borgstrom, David C. ; Weigelt, John A. / Management of penetrating colon trauma : A cost-utility analysis. In: Surgery. 1999 ; Vol. 125, No. 5. pp. 471-479.
@article{47d52388d11a43c3b4384544d4d0de9b,
title = "Management of penetrating colon trauma: A cost-utility analysis",
abstract = "Background. Management of penetrating colon injuries in the presence of multiple associated risk factors is controversial. Issues not considered in previous management strategies are patient perception of quality of life with a colostomy and the true cost of each therapeutic option, which includes colostomy supplies and costs of colostomy takedown. To evaluate these issues, we performed a cost-utility analysis. Methods. We constructed a decision tree with 3 options: primary repair, resection and anastomosis, and colostomy. Chance and decision nodes on each decision branch represent injury severity, complications, colostomy takedown, and death. Chance node frequencies and utility assignments were taken from published data. We obtained actual costs for all components of perioperative care. The outcomes reported are cost and quality of life. Results. Colostomy has the least quality of life and the greatest cost. Primary repair and resection each dominate colostomy in the baseline analysis. No variable significantly altered these conclusions in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions. Simple suture or resection and anastomosis at the time of initial exploration is the dominant management method for penetrating colon trauma. It also demonstrates the trade-off between cost and life expectancy of the 3 management options.",
author = "Karen Brasel and Borgstrom, {David C.} and Weigelt, {John A.}",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70197-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "125",
pages = "471--479",
journal = "Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0039-6060",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of penetrating colon trauma

T2 - A cost-utility analysis

AU - Brasel, Karen

AU - Borgstrom, David C.

AU - Weigelt, John A.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Background. Management of penetrating colon injuries in the presence of multiple associated risk factors is controversial. Issues not considered in previous management strategies are patient perception of quality of life with a colostomy and the true cost of each therapeutic option, which includes colostomy supplies and costs of colostomy takedown. To evaluate these issues, we performed a cost-utility analysis. Methods. We constructed a decision tree with 3 options: primary repair, resection and anastomosis, and colostomy. Chance and decision nodes on each decision branch represent injury severity, complications, colostomy takedown, and death. Chance node frequencies and utility assignments were taken from published data. We obtained actual costs for all components of perioperative care. The outcomes reported are cost and quality of life. Results. Colostomy has the least quality of life and the greatest cost. Primary repair and resection each dominate colostomy in the baseline analysis. No variable significantly altered these conclusions in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions. Simple suture or resection and anastomosis at the time of initial exploration is the dominant management method for penetrating colon trauma. It also demonstrates the trade-off between cost and life expectancy of the 3 management options.

AB - Background. Management of penetrating colon injuries in the presence of multiple associated risk factors is controversial. Issues not considered in previous management strategies are patient perception of quality of life with a colostomy and the true cost of each therapeutic option, which includes colostomy supplies and costs of colostomy takedown. To evaluate these issues, we performed a cost-utility analysis. Methods. We constructed a decision tree with 3 options: primary repair, resection and anastomosis, and colostomy. Chance and decision nodes on each decision branch represent injury severity, complications, colostomy takedown, and death. Chance node frequencies and utility assignments were taken from published data. We obtained actual costs for all components of perioperative care. The outcomes reported are cost and quality of life. Results. Colostomy has the least quality of life and the greatest cost. Primary repair and resection each dominate colostomy in the baseline analysis. No variable significantly altered these conclusions in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions. Simple suture or resection and anastomosis at the time of initial exploration is the dominant management method for penetrating colon trauma. It also demonstrates the trade-off between cost and life expectancy of the 3 management options.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032914746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032914746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70197-2

DO - 10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70197-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 10330934

AN - SCOPUS:0032914746

VL - 125

SP - 471

EP - 479

JO - Surgery (United States)

JF - Surgery (United States)

SN - 0039-6060

IS - 5

ER -