TY - JOUR
T1 - Making difficult decisions about hospice enrollment
T2 - What do patients and families want to know?
AU - Casarett, David
AU - Crowley, Roxane
AU - Stevenson, Carolyn
AU - Xie, Sharon
AU - Teno, Joan
PY - 2005/2
Y1 - 2005/2
N2 - OBJECTIVES: To define patients' and families' priorities for information about hospice. DESIGN: Cross-sectional interview. SETTING: Urban, not-for-profit, Medicare-certified hospice. PARTICIPANTS: Patients and families recruited from consecutive hospice information visits. MEASUREMENTS: Understanding of hospice, assessment of the relative importance of eight categories of information (by direct rating and ranking tasks), and nurse observation of shared decision making between patient and family (5-point scale). RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 237 patients and families at a hospice information visit. Forty percent (n = 94) said that they knew anything about hospice. Most often, family members made the enrollment decision (n = 132, 57%). Of the eight categories of information, patients and families placed the greatest importance on visit frequency (n = 143, 60%), payment for hospice (n = 140, 59%), and the practical help that hospice provides (n = 123, 52%). Principal component factor analysis reduced the categories to three distinct factors reflecting concerns related to impending death, practical support, and changes from established patterns of care. CONCLUSION: Most patients and families who are referred for a hospice information visit know little about hospice and have substantial information needs. Referring physicians and hospice teams may be able to better support hospice enrollment decisions by anticipating common priorities for information.
AB - OBJECTIVES: To define patients' and families' priorities for information about hospice. DESIGN: Cross-sectional interview. SETTING: Urban, not-for-profit, Medicare-certified hospice. PARTICIPANTS: Patients and families recruited from consecutive hospice information visits. MEASUREMENTS: Understanding of hospice, assessment of the relative importance of eight categories of information (by direct rating and ranking tasks), and nurse observation of shared decision making between patient and family (5-point scale). RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 237 patients and families at a hospice information visit. Forty percent (n = 94) said that they knew anything about hospice. Most often, family members made the enrollment decision (n = 132, 57%). Of the eight categories of information, patients and families placed the greatest importance on visit frequency (n = 143, 60%), payment for hospice (n = 140, 59%), and the practical help that hospice provides (n = 123, 52%). Principal component factor analysis reduced the categories to three distinct factors reflecting concerns related to impending death, practical support, and changes from established patterns of care. CONCLUSION: Most patients and families who are referred for a hospice information visit know little about hospice and have substantial information needs. Referring physicians and hospice teams may be able to better support hospice enrollment decisions by anticipating common priorities for information.
KW - Decision making
KW - End-of-life care
KW - Hospice
KW - Informed consent
KW - Palliative care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15044349243&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=15044349243&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53110.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53110.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 15673348
AN - SCOPUS:15044349243
SN - 0002-8614
VL - 53
SP - 249
EP - 254
JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
IS - 2
ER -