Magnetic resonance angiography in the preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Michael J. Petersen, Richard P. Cambria, John Kaufman, Glen M. LaMuraglia, Jonathan P. Gertler, David C. Brewster, Stuart C. Geller, Arthur C. Waltman, Gilbert J. L'Italien, William M. Abbott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Contrast arteriography (CA) is a useful but invasive technique for the preoperative evaluation of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). To evaluate the use of magnetic resonance arteriography (MRA) as a preoperative study we prospectively studied 38 patients undergoing AAA repair. Methods: All patients underwent biplane CA and MRA with use of a gadolinium-enhanced technique. Radiographic studies were then independently evaluated by blinded radiologists for anatomic findings with CA used as the standard. Studies were then independently evaluated by blinded vascular surgeons, and a surgical plan was made. Results: With CA and intraoperative findings as the standards, MRA proved highly accurate in the determination of multiple key anatomic elements. The proximal extent of aneurysmal disease was correctly predicted in 87% (33/38) patients. Significant iliofemoral occlusive disease was identified with a sensitivity of 83% (5/6). Iliac or femoral aneurysms were detected with a sensitivity of 79% (22/28) and specificity of 86% (41/48). Significant renal artery stenosis was detected with a sensitivity of 71% (12/17) and a specificity of 99% (72/73). Accessory renal arteries were correctly identified in 71% (12/17). Surgeon evaluators correctly predicted the proximal cross-clamp site in 87% (33/38) of patients with use of MRA as compared with the actual operative conduct. Proximal anastomotic sites were correctly predicted in 95% (36/38) with MRA and 97% (37/38) with CA. Renal revascularization was predicted by MRA with a sensitivity of 91% (10/11) and specificity of 100% (65/65). The use of bifurcated aortic prostheses was correctly predicted by MRA in 75% (12/16), which was similar to that predicted by CA (81%, 13/16). Conclusions: MRA can provide preoperative anatomic information that is equivalent to CA for surgical planning. Because of favorable cost and patient safety considerations MRA will assume increasing importance in the preoperative evaluation of AAA. (J VASC SURG 1995;21:891-9.).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)891-899
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Angiography
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Renal Artery Obstruction
Gadolinium
Renal Artery
Patient Safety
Thigh

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Petersen, M. J., Cambria, R. P., Kaufman, J., LaMuraglia, G. M., Gertler, J. P., Brewster, D. C., ... Abbott, W. M. (1995). Magnetic resonance angiography in the preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 21(6), 891-899. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70216-4

Magnetic resonance angiography in the preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms. / Petersen, Michael J.; Cambria, Richard P.; Kaufman, John; LaMuraglia, Glen M.; Gertler, Jonathan P.; Brewster, David C.; Geller, Stuart C.; Waltman, Arthur C.; L'Italien, Gilbert J.; Abbott, William M.

In: Journal of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 21, No. 6, 1995, p. 891-899.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Petersen, MJ, Cambria, RP, Kaufman, J, LaMuraglia, GM, Gertler, JP, Brewster, DC, Geller, SC, Waltman, AC, L'Italien, GJ & Abbott, WM 1995, 'Magnetic resonance angiography in the preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms', Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 891-899. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70216-4
Petersen, Michael J. ; Cambria, Richard P. ; Kaufman, John ; LaMuraglia, Glen M. ; Gertler, Jonathan P. ; Brewster, David C. ; Geller, Stuart C. ; Waltman, Arthur C. ; L'Italien, Gilbert J. ; Abbott, William M. / Magnetic resonance angiography in the preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms. In: Journal of Vascular Surgery. 1995 ; Vol. 21, No. 6. pp. 891-899.
@article{dfb48cbf971d43f1a20946aeb6370ca2,
title = "Magnetic resonance angiography in the preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms",
abstract = "Purpose: Contrast arteriography (CA) is a useful but invasive technique for the preoperative evaluation of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). To evaluate the use of magnetic resonance arteriography (MRA) as a preoperative study we prospectively studied 38 patients undergoing AAA repair. Methods: All patients underwent biplane CA and MRA with use of a gadolinium-enhanced technique. Radiographic studies were then independently evaluated by blinded radiologists for anatomic findings with CA used as the standard. Studies were then independently evaluated by blinded vascular surgeons, and a surgical plan was made. Results: With CA and intraoperative findings as the standards, MRA proved highly accurate in the determination of multiple key anatomic elements. The proximal extent of aneurysmal disease was correctly predicted in 87{\%} (33/38) patients. Significant iliofemoral occlusive disease was identified with a sensitivity of 83{\%} (5/6). Iliac or femoral aneurysms were detected with a sensitivity of 79{\%} (22/28) and specificity of 86{\%} (41/48). Significant renal artery stenosis was detected with a sensitivity of 71{\%} (12/17) and a specificity of 99{\%} (72/73). Accessory renal arteries were correctly identified in 71{\%} (12/17). Surgeon evaluators correctly predicted the proximal cross-clamp site in 87{\%} (33/38) of patients with use of MRA as compared with the actual operative conduct. Proximal anastomotic sites were correctly predicted in 95{\%} (36/38) with MRA and 97{\%} (37/38) with CA. Renal revascularization was predicted by MRA with a sensitivity of 91{\%} (10/11) and specificity of 100{\%} (65/65). The use of bifurcated aortic prostheses was correctly predicted by MRA in 75{\%} (12/16), which was similar to that predicted by CA (81{\%}, 13/16). Conclusions: MRA can provide preoperative anatomic information that is equivalent to CA for surgical planning. Because of favorable cost and patient safety considerations MRA will assume increasing importance in the preoperative evaluation of AAA. (J VASC SURG 1995;21:891-9.).",
author = "Petersen, {Michael J.} and Cambria, {Richard P.} and John Kaufman and LaMuraglia, {Glen M.} and Gertler, {Jonathan P.} and Brewster, {David C.} and Geller, {Stuart C.} and Waltman, {Arthur C.} and L'Italien, {Gilbert J.} and Abbott, {William M.}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70216-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "891--899",
journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Magnetic resonance angiography in the preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms

AU - Petersen, Michael J.

AU - Cambria, Richard P.

AU - Kaufman, John

AU - LaMuraglia, Glen M.

AU - Gertler, Jonathan P.

AU - Brewster, David C.

AU - Geller, Stuart C.

AU - Waltman, Arthur C.

AU - L'Italien, Gilbert J.

AU - Abbott, William M.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Purpose: Contrast arteriography (CA) is a useful but invasive technique for the preoperative evaluation of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). To evaluate the use of magnetic resonance arteriography (MRA) as a preoperative study we prospectively studied 38 patients undergoing AAA repair. Methods: All patients underwent biplane CA and MRA with use of a gadolinium-enhanced technique. Radiographic studies were then independently evaluated by blinded radiologists for anatomic findings with CA used as the standard. Studies were then independently evaluated by blinded vascular surgeons, and a surgical plan was made. Results: With CA and intraoperative findings as the standards, MRA proved highly accurate in the determination of multiple key anatomic elements. The proximal extent of aneurysmal disease was correctly predicted in 87% (33/38) patients. Significant iliofemoral occlusive disease was identified with a sensitivity of 83% (5/6). Iliac or femoral aneurysms were detected with a sensitivity of 79% (22/28) and specificity of 86% (41/48). Significant renal artery stenosis was detected with a sensitivity of 71% (12/17) and a specificity of 99% (72/73). Accessory renal arteries were correctly identified in 71% (12/17). Surgeon evaluators correctly predicted the proximal cross-clamp site in 87% (33/38) of patients with use of MRA as compared with the actual operative conduct. Proximal anastomotic sites were correctly predicted in 95% (36/38) with MRA and 97% (37/38) with CA. Renal revascularization was predicted by MRA with a sensitivity of 91% (10/11) and specificity of 100% (65/65). The use of bifurcated aortic prostheses was correctly predicted by MRA in 75% (12/16), which was similar to that predicted by CA (81%, 13/16). Conclusions: MRA can provide preoperative anatomic information that is equivalent to CA for surgical planning. Because of favorable cost and patient safety considerations MRA will assume increasing importance in the preoperative evaluation of AAA. (J VASC SURG 1995;21:891-9.).

AB - Purpose: Contrast arteriography (CA) is a useful but invasive technique for the preoperative evaluation of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). To evaluate the use of magnetic resonance arteriography (MRA) as a preoperative study we prospectively studied 38 patients undergoing AAA repair. Methods: All patients underwent biplane CA and MRA with use of a gadolinium-enhanced technique. Radiographic studies were then independently evaluated by blinded radiologists for anatomic findings with CA used as the standard. Studies were then independently evaluated by blinded vascular surgeons, and a surgical plan was made. Results: With CA and intraoperative findings as the standards, MRA proved highly accurate in the determination of multiple key anatomic elements. The proximal extent of aneurysmal disease was correctly predicted in 87% (33/38) patients. Significant iliofemoral occlusive disease was identified with a sensitivity of 83% (5/6). Iliac or femoral aneurysms were detected with a sensitivity of 79% (22/28) and specificity of 86% (41/48). Significant renal artery stenosis was detected with a sensitivity of 71% (12/17) and a specificity of 99% (72/73). Accessory renal arteries were correctly identified in 71% (12/17). Surgeon evaluators correctly predicted the proximal cross-clamp site in 87% (33/38) of patients with use of MRA as compared with the actual operative conduct. Proximal anastomotic sites were correctly predicted in 95% (36/38) with MRA and 97% (37/38) with CA. Renal revascularization was predicted by MRA with a sensitivity of 91% (10/11) and specificity of 100% (65/65). The use of bifurcated aortic prostheses was correctly predicted by MRA in 75% (12/16), which was similar to that predicted by CA (81%, 13/16). Conclusions: MRA can provide preoperative anatomic information that is equivalent to CA for surgical planning. Because of favorable cost and patient safety considerations MRA will assume increasing importance in the preoperative evaluation of AAA. (J VASC SURG 1995;21:891-9.).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029022698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029022698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70216-4

DO - 10.1016/S0741-5214(95)70216-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 7776468

AN - SCOPUS:0029022698

VL - 21

SP - 891

EP - 899

JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0741-5214

IS - 6

ER -