TY - JOUR
T1 - Machine Learning Models can Detect Aneurysm Rupture and Identify Clinical Features Associated with Rupture
AU - Silva, Michael A.
AU - Patel, Jay
AU - Kavouridis, Vasileios
AU - Gallerani, Troy
AU - Beers, Andrew
AU - Chang, Ken
AU - Hoebel, Katharina V.
AU - Brown, James
AU - See, Alfred P.
AU - Gormley, William B.
AU - Aziz-Sultan, Mohammad Ali
AU - Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree
AU - Arnaout, Omar
AU - Patel, Nirav J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2019/11
Y1 - 2019/11
N2 - Background: Machine learning (ML) has been increasingly used in medicine and neurosurgery. We sought to determine whether ML models can distinguish ruptured from unruptured aneurysms and identify features associated with rupture. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients with intracranial aneurysms detected on vascular imaging at our institution between 2002 and 2018. The dataset was used to train 3 ML models (random forest, linear support vector machine [SVM], and radial basis function kernel SVM). Relative contributions of individual predictors were derived from the linear SVM model. Results: Complete data were available for 845 aneurysms in 615 patients. Ruptured aneurysms (n = 309, 37%) were larger (mean 6.51 mm vs. 5.73 mm; P = 0.02) and more likely to be in the posterior circulation (20% vs. 11%; P < 0.001) than unruptured aneurysms. Area under the receiver operating curve was 0.77 for the linear SVM, 0.78 for the radial basis function kernel SVM models, and 0.81 for the random forest model. Aneurysm location and size were the 2 features that contributed most significantly to the model. Posterior communicating artery, anterior communicating artery, and posterior inferior cerebellar artery locations were most highly associated with rupture, whereas paraclinoid and middle cerebral artery locations had the strongest association with unruptured status. Conclusions: ML models are capable of accurately distinguishing ruptured from unruptured aneurysms and identifying features associated with rupture. Consistent with prior studies, location and size show the strongest association with aneurysm rupture.
AB - Background: Machine learning (ML) has been increasingly used in medicine and neurosurgery. We sought to determine whether ML models can distinguish ruptured from unruptured aneurysms and identify features associated with rupture. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients with intracranial aneurysms detected on vascular imaging at our institution between 2002 and 2018. The dataset was used to train 3 ML models (random forest, linear support vector machine [SVM], and radial basis function kernel SVM). Relative contributions of individual predictors were derived from the linear SVM model. Results: Complete data were available for 845 aneurysms in 615 patients. Ruptured aneurysms (n = 309, 37%) were larger (mean 6.51 mm vs. 5.73 mm; P = 0.02) and more likely to be in the posterior circulation (20% vs. 11%; P < 0.001) than unruptured aneurysms. Area under the receiver operating curve was 0.77 for the linear SVM, 0.78 for the radial basis function kernel SVM models, and 0.81 for the random forest model. Aneurysm location and size were the 2 features that contributed most significantly to the model. Posterior communicating artery, anterior communicating artery, and posterior inferior cerebellar artery locations were most highly associated with rupture, whereas paraclinoid and middle cerebral artery locations had the strongest association with unruptured status. Conclusions: ML models are capable of accurately distinguishing ruptured from unruptured aneurysms and identifying features associated with rupture. Consistent with prior studies, location and size show the strongest association with aneurysm rupture.
KW - Aneurysm
KW - Aneurysm rupture
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Machine learning
KW - Subarachnoid hemorrhage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071113762&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071113762&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.231
DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.231
M3 - Article
C2 - 31295616
AN - SCOPUS:85071113762
SN - 1878-8750
VL - 131
SP - e46-e51
JO - World Neurosurgery
JF - World Neurosurgery
ER -