Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index: Pilot testing of consistency, reliability, and validity

Robert Hart, Kenneth Gundle, Stephan L. Pro, Lynn Marshall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background context: The primary goal of surgical arthrodesis is to eliminate the motion of spinal segments in an effort to alleviate pain, improve deformity, and reduce disability. However, decreased spinal mobility may impair performance of activities of daily living (ADLs) due to the resulting stiffness or the lack of mobility of the fused segment. Current clinical outcome instruments do not seek information regarding the impact of spinal stiffness on functional ability. Therefore, a patient-reported outcome questionnaire measuring the impact of lumbar stiffness on functional abilities was devised and assessed for internal consistency, retest repeatability, and external validity. Purpose: To develop and validate an outcome instrument to measure the collateral effect of stiffness after lumbar fusion on functional ability. Study design: Cross-sectional pilot study. Patient sample: Consecutive cohort of lumbar spine fusion patients from a single surgeon's practice. Outcome measures: Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI) and Cobb angle measurements from digital radiographs. Methods: We developed and evaluated a 10-item questionnaire, referred to as the LSDI, which seeks information on the impact of spinal stiffness on ADLs after lumbar spinal arthrodesis. The questionnaire yields a score from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater difficulty resulting from lumbar spinal stiffness in performing 10 different ADLs. The study sample comprised 32 lumbar arthrodesis patients at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. All patients completed the questionnaire twice via telephone interviews conducted 4 weeks apart. Internal consistency was assessed using the Cronbach alpha, and retest reliability was measured using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). External validity of the questionnaire was evaluated by correlating the scores with lumbar range of motion (LROM) as measured from the angular change between the inferior end plate of T12 and the superior end plate of S1 on standardized digital flexion and extension lateral radiographs. Results: The study sample included 22 women (69%) and 10 men (31%) with an average age of 63 years. The questionnaire demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha=0.89). Retest reliability was also high (ICC=0.87). External validity was demonstrated by a statistically significant inverse relationship between LROM and LSDI scores (r=-0.71; p

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)157-161
Number of pages5
JournalSpine Journal
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Aptitude
Arthrodesis
Activities of Daily Living
Articular Range of Motion
Surveys and Questionnaires
Spine
Cross-Sectional Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Interviews
Pain

Keywords

  • Adverse events
  • Degenerative disease
  • Lumbar spine
  • Scoliosis
  • Spinal fusion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index : Pilot testing of consistency, reliability, and validity. / Hart, Robert; Gundle, Kenneth; Pro, Stephan L.; Marshall, Lynn.

In: Spine Journal, Vol. 13, No. 2, 02.2013, p. 157-161.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{93b2b28084614aa79050979147e1ea30,
title = "Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index: Pilot testing of consistency, reliability, and validity",
abstract = "Background context: The primary goal of surgical arthrodesis is to eliminate the motion of spinal segments in an effort to alleviate pain, improve deformity, and reduce disability. However, decreased spinal mobility may impair performance of activities of daily living (ADLs) due to the resulting stiffness or the lack of mobility of the fused segment. Current clinical outcome instruments do not seek information regarding the impact of spinal stiffness on functional ability. Therefore, a patient-reported outcome questionnaire measuring the impact of lumbar stiffness on functional abilities was devised and assessed for internal consistency, retest repeatability, and external validity. Purpose: To develop and validate an outcome instrument to measure the collateral effect of stiffness after lumbar fusion on functional ability. Study design: Cross-sectional pilot study. Patient sample: Consecutive cohort of lumbar spine fusion patients from a single surgeon's practice. Outcome measures: Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI) and Cobb angle measurements from digital radiographs. Methods: We developed and evaluated a 10-item questionnaire, referred to as the LSDI, which seeks information on the impact of spinal stiffness on ADLs after lumbar spinal arthrodesis. The questionnaire yields a score from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater difficulty resulting from lumbar spinal stiffness in performing 10 different ADLs. The study sample comprised 32 lumbar arthrodesis patients at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. All patients completed the questionnaire twice via telephone interviews conducted 4 weeks apart. Internal consistency was assessed using the Cronbach alpha, and retest reliability was measured using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). External validity of the questionnaire was evaluated by correlating the scores with lumbar range of motion (LROM) as measured from the angular change between the inferior end plate of T12 and the superior end plate of S1 on standardized digital flexion and extension lateral radiographs. Results: The study sample included 22 women (69{\%}) and 10 men (31{\%}) with an average age of 63 years. The questionnaire demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha=0.89). Retest reliability was also high (ICC=0.87). External validity was demonstrated by a statistically significant inverse relationship between LROM and LSDI scores (r=-0.71; p",
keywords = "Adverse events, Degenerative disease, Lumbar spine, Scoliosis, Spinal fusion",
author = "Robert Hart and Kenneth Gundle and Pro, {Stephan L.} and Lynn Marshall",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.spinee.2012.12.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "157--161",
journal = "Spine Journal",
issn = "1529-9430",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index

T2 - Pilot testing of consistency, reliability, and validity

AU - Hart, Robert

AU - Gundle, Kenneth

AU - Pro, Stephan L.

AU - Marshall, Lynn

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Background context: The primary goal of surgical arthrodesis is to eliminate the motion of spinal segments in an effort to alleviate pain, improve deformity, and reduce disability. However, decreased spinal mobility may impair performance of activities of daily living (ADLs) due to the resulting stiffness or the lack of mobility of the fused segment. Current clinical outcome instruments do not seek information regarding the impact of spinal stiffness on functional ability. Therefore, a patient-reported outcome questionnaire measuring the impact of lumbar stiffness on functional abilities was devised and assessed for internal consistency, retest repeatability, and external validity. Purpose: To develop and validate an outcome instrument to measure the collateral effect of stiffness after lumbar fusion on functional ability. Study design: Cross-sectional pilot study. Patient sample: Consecutive cohort of lumbar spine fusion patients from a single surgeon's practice. Outcome measures: Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI) and Cobb angle measurements from digital radiographs. Methods: We developed and evaluated a 10-item questionnaire, referred to as the LSDI, which seeks information on the impact of spinal stiffness on ADLs after lumbar spinal arthrodesis. The questionnaire yields a score from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater difficulty resulting from lumbar spinal stiffness in performing 10 different ADLs. The study sample comprised 32 lumbar arthrodesis patients at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. All patients completed the questionnaire twice via telephone interviews conducted 4 weeks apart. Internal consistency was assessed using the Cronbach alpha, and retest reliability was measured using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). External validity of the questionnaire was evaluated by correlating the scores with lumbar range of motion (LROM) as measured from the angular change between the inferior end plate of T12 and the superior end plate of S1 on standardized digital flexion and extension lateral radiographs. Results: The study sample included 22 women (69%) and 10 men (31%) with an average age of 63 years. The questionnaire demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha=0.89). Retest reliability was also high (ICC=0.87). External validity was demonstrated by a statistically significant inverse relationship between LROM and LSDI scores (r=-0.71; p

AB - Background context: The primary goal of surgical arthrodesis is to eliminate the motion of spinal segments in an effort to alleviate pain, improve deformity, and reduce disability. However, decreased spinal mobility may impair performance of activities of daily living (ADLs) due to the resulting stiffness or the lack of mobility of the fused segment. Current clinical outcome instruments do not seek information regarding the impact of spinal stiffness on functional ability. Therefore, a patient-reported outcome questionnaire measuring the impact of lumbar stiffness on functional abilities was devised and assessed for internal consistency, retest repeatability, and external validity. Purpose: To develop and validate an outcome instrument to measure the collateral effect of stiffness after lumbar fusion on functional ability. Study design: Cross-sectional pilot study. Patient sample: Consecutive cohort of lumbar spine fusion patients from a single surgeon's practice. Outcome measures: Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI) and Cobb angle measurements from digital radiographs. Methods: We developed and evaluated a 10-item questionnaire, referred to as the LSDI, which seeks information on the impact of spinal stiffness on ADLs after lumbar spinal arthrodesis. The questionnaire yields a score from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater difficulty resulting from lumbar spinal stiffness in performing 10 different ADLs. The study sample comprised 32 lumbar arthrodesis patients at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. All patients completed the questionnaire twice via telephone interviews conducted 4 weeks apart. Internal consistency was assessed using the Cronbach alpha, and retest reliability was measured using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). External validity of the questionnaire was evaluated by correlating the scores with lumbar range of motion (LROM) as measured from the angular change between the inferior end plate of T12 and the superior end plate of S1 on standardized digital flexion and extension lateral radiographs. Results: The study sample included 22 women (69%) and 10 men (31%) with an average age of 63 years. The questionnaire demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach alpha=0.89). Retest reliability was also high (ICC=0.87). External validity was demonstrated by a statistically significant inverse relationship between LROM and LSDI scores (r=-0.71; p

KW - Adverse events

KW - Degenerative disease

KW - Lumbar spine

KW - Scoliosis

KW - Spinal fusion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875251934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875251934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.12.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 23337543

AN - SCOPUS:84875251934

VL - 13

SP - 157

EP - 161

JO - Spine Journal

JF - Spine Journal

SN - 1529-9430

IS - 2

ER -