Lumbar stiffness as a collateral outcome of spinal arthrodesis: A preliminary clinical study

Robert A. Hart, Stephan L. Pro, Kenneth R. Gundle, Lynn M. Marshall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background context: Although spinal arthrodesis can improve function by correcting deformity and reducing pain, it also by intention reduces spinal mobility. Increased spinal stiffness may have the potential to impair function and ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs), independent of pain levels. Purpose: To evaluate the ability to discriminate spinal stiffness from pain in ADLs after lumbar spine arthrodesis using two outcome instruments. Study design: Cross-sectional study. Patient sample: Consecutive cohort of lumbar spine fusion patients from a single surgeon's practice. Outcome measures: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Lumbar Stiffness Disability Index (LSDI), radiographs. Methods: We developed the LSDI questionnaire to assess the impact of spinal stiffness on ability to perform different ADLs. The LSDI and ODI were administered to 93 patients who underwent lumbar arthrodesis extending from one to five or more motion segments at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Comparisons of mean LSDI and ODI scores between patients were made using generalized linear regression. A Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was computed to determine the relationship between the LSDI and ODI scores. Results: The sample included 61 women and 32 men, with mean age at surgery of 55.0 years (standard deviation [SD], 13.1) and mean time since surgery of 3.4 years (SD, 1.8). The mean LSDI score was 29.6 (SD, 19.2), and the mean ODI score was 39.7 (SD, 19.1). Comparing one-level and five-level arthrodesis, the LSDI scores were significantly different (p=.05), whereas the ODI scores were not significantly different (p=.36). Comparisons between other levels of arthrodesis did not show significant differences for either the LSDI or the ODI. Within the entire study group, LSDI and ODI scores were positively correlated (r=0.69, p<.001). Conclusions: Difficulty in performing certain ADLs increases for patients with multilevel lumbar fusions as opposed to one-level arthrodesis. The LSDI distinguishes functional difficulties with ADLs accruing because of spinal stiffness, which appear to be independent of the functional limitations resulting from low back pain as measured by ODI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)150-156
Number of pages7
JournalSpine Journal
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2013

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Adverse outcome
  • Complications
  • Lumbar spine
  • Outcome instruments
  • Spine fusion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this