Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with and without Waddell Signs

J. S. Cox, S. Blizzard, Hans Carlson, Jayme Hiratzka, Jung Yoo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Context Waddell Signs (WS), introduced as a method to establish patients with substantial psychosocial components to their low back pain, carry a negative association despite no literature evaluating whether physical disease is associated with them. Purpose To compare lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings between the patients with and without WS. Study Design Retrospective cohort study based on prospectively collected data. Patient Sample Thirty patients aged 35 to 55 years with an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score >50 randomly selected such that there was an even distribution of patients based on the number of WS. Outcome Measures ODI and Short Form-12 scores, number of WS, presence and severity of spinal pathology. Methods MRIs were reviewed by three spine specialists blinded to clinical exam findings, number of WS, and patient identity. Type and severity of pathology and presence of surgical and non-surgical lesions were assessed, and findings were rank ordered based on the overall impression of the pathology. There was no external funding or potential conflicts of interest for this study. Results There were significantly more individual pathologic findings in patients without WS (p=.02). However, there was no difference in the severity of pathology based on WS (p=.46). Furthermore, the rank ordering based on overall impression of severity showed no difference between the patients with and without WS (p=.20). Although 100% of the patients without WS showed pathologic findings on MRI, 70% of WS patients also had significant pathology on MRI. The prevalence of spondylolisthesis, stenosis, and disc herniation was similar (p=.41, p=.22, and p=.43, respectively). The prevalence and mean number of lesion amenable to surgery did not differ based on presence of WS (p=.21 and p=.18, respectively). Conclusions Patients with WS present a difficult diagnostic challenge for the physician as their organic symptoms are often coexistent with emotional fear avoidance behavior. Although there is more overall pathology in patients without WS, a significant number of these patients appear to have comparable spinal pathology with equivalent severity, which may be contributing to patients' symptoms and disability. Presence of these non-organic symptoms often makes us doubt these patients. However, as part of effective treatment, physicians should better understand both the physical and psychological components of patient disability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)990-994
Number of pages5
JournalSpine Journal
Volume17
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Pathology
Avoidance Learning
Physicians
Spondylolisthesis
Conflict of Interest
Surgical Pathology
Low Back Pain
Fear
Pathologic Constriction
Spine
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Psychology

Keywords

  • Back pain
  • Diagnostic imaging
  • Lumbar surgery
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • Surgical lesions
  • Waddell Signs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with and without Waddell Signs. / Cox, J. S.; Blizzard, S.; Carlson, Hans; Hiratzka, Jayme; Yoo, Jung.

In: Spine Journal, Vol. 17, No. 7, 01.07.2017, p. 990-994.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{720c49998168471a96ef2cbd69f26d0e,
title = "Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with and without Waddell Signs",
abstract = "Background Context Waddell Signs (WS), introduced as a method to establish patients with substantial psychosocial components to their low back pain, carry a negative association despite no literature evaluating whether physical disease is associated with them. Purpose To compare lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings between the patients with and without WS. Study Design Retrospective cohort study based on prospectively collected data. Patient Sample Thirty patients aged 35 to 55 years with an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score >50 randomly selected such that there was an even distribution of patients based on the number of WS. Outcome Measures ODI and Short Form-12 scores, number of WS, presence and severity of spinal pathology. Methods MRIs were reviewed by three spine specialists blinded to clinical exam findings, number of WS, and patient identity. Type and severity of pathology and presence of surgical and non-surgical lesions were assessed, and findings were rank ordered based on the overall impression of the pathology. There was no external funding or potential conflicts of interest for this study. Results There were significantly more individual pathologic findings in patients without WS (p=.02). However, there was no difference in the severity of pathology based on WS (p=.46). Furthermore, the rank ordering based on overall impression of severity showed no difference between the patients with and without WS (p=.20). Although 100{\%} of the patients without WS showed pathologic findings on MRI, 70{\%} of WS patients also had significant pathology on MRI. The prevalence of spondylolisthesis, stenosis, and disc herniation was similar (p=.41, p=.22, and p=.43, respectively). The prevalence and mean number of lesion amenable to surgery did not differ based on presence of WS (p=.21 and p=.18, respectively). Conclusions Patients with WS present a difficult diagnostic challenge for the physician as their organic symptoms are often coexistent with emotional fear avoidance behavior. Although there is more overall pathology in patients without WS, a significant number of these patients appear to have comparable spinal pathology with equivalent severity, which may be contributing to patients' symptoms and disability. Presence of these non-organic symptoms often makes us doubt these patients. However, as part of effective treatment, physicians should better understand both the physical and psychological components of patient disability.",
keywords = "Back pain, Diagnostic imaging, Lumbar surgery, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Surgical lesions, Waddell Signs",
author = "Cox, {J. S.} and S. Blizzard and Hans Carlson and Jayme Hiratzka and Jung Yoo",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.spinee.2017.03.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "990--994",
journal = "Spine Journal",
issn = "1529-9430",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with and without Waddell Signs

AU - Cox, J. S.

AU - Blizzard, S.

AU - Carlson, Hans

AU - Hiratzka, Jayme

AU - Yoo, Jung

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Background Context Waddell Signs (WS), introduced as a method to establish patients with substantial psychosocial components to their low back pain, carry a negative association despite no literature evaluating whether physical disease is associated with them. Purpose To compare lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings between the patients with and without WS. Study Design Retrospective cohort study based on prospectively collected data. Patient Sample Thirty patients aged 35 to 55 years with an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score >50 randomly selected such that there was an even distribution of patients based on the number of WS. Outcome Measures ODI and Short Form-12 scores, number of WS, presence and severity of spinal pathology. Methods MRIs were reviewed by three spine specialists blinded to clinical exam findings, number of WS, and patient identity. Type and severity of pathology and presence of surgical and non-surgical lesions were assessed, and findings were rank ordered based on the overall impression of the pathology. There was no external funding or potential conflicts of interest for this study. Results There were significantly more individual pathologic findings in patients without WS (p=.02). However, there was no difference in the severity of pathology based on WS (p=.46). Furthermore, the rank ordering based on overall impression of severity showed no difference between the patients with and without WS (p=.20). Although 100% of the patients without WS showed pathologic findings on MRI, 70% of WS patients also had significant pathology on MRI. The prevalence of spondylolisthesis, stenosis, and disc herniation was similar (p=.41, p=.22, and p=.43, respectively). The prevalence and mean number of lesion amenable to surgery did not differ based on presence of WS (p=.21 and p=.18, respectively). Conclusions Patients with WS present a difficult diagnostic challenge for the physician as their organic symptoms are often coexistent with emotional fear avoidance behavior. Although there is more overall pathology in patients without WS, a significant number of these patients appear to have comparable spinal pathology with equivalent severity, which may be contributing to patients' symptoms and disability. Presence of these non-organic symptoms often makes us doubt these patients. However, as part of effective treatment, physicians should better understand both the physical and psychological components of patient disability.

AB - Background Context Waddell Signs (WS), introduced as a method to establish patients with substantial psychosocial components to their low back pain, carry a negative association despite no literature evaluating whether physical disease is associated with them. Purpose To compare lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings between the patients with and without WS. Study Design Retrospective cohort study based on prospectively collected data. Patient Sample Thirty patients aged 35 to 55 years with an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score >50 randomly selected such that there was an even distribution of patients based on the number of WS. Outcome Measures ODI and Short Form-12 scores, number of WS, presence and severity of spinal pathology. Methods MRIs were reviewed by three spine specialists blinded to clinical exam findings, number of WS, and patient identity. Type and severity of pathology and presence of surgical and non-surgical lesions were assessed, and findings were rank ordered based on the overall impression of the pathology. There was no external funding or potential conflicts of interest for this study. Results There were significantly more individual pathologic findings in patients without WS (p=.02). However, there was no difference in the severity of pathology based on WS (p=.46). Furthermore, the rank ordering based on overall impression of severity showed no difference between the patients with and without WS (p=.20). Although 100% of the patients without WS showed pathologic findings on MRI, 70% of WS patients also had significant pathology on MRI. The prevalence of spondylolisthesis, stenosis, and disc herniation was similar (p=.41, p=.22, and p=.43, respectively). The prevalence and mean number of lesion amenable to surgery did not differ based on presence of WS (p=.21 and p=.18, respectively). Conclusions Patients with WS present a difficult diagnostic challenge for the physician as their organic symptoms are often coexistent with emotional fear avoidance behavior. Although there is more overall pathology in patients without WS, a significant number of these patients appear to have comparable spinal pathology with equivalent severity, which may be contributing to patients' symptoms and disability. Presence of these non-organic symptoms often makes us doubt these patients. However, as part of effective treatment, physicians should better understand both the physical and psychological components of patient disability.

KW - Back pain

KW - Diagnostic imaging

KW - Lumbar surgery

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

KW - Surgical lesions

KW - Waddell Signs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017362230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017362230&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.03.007

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 990

EP - 994

JO - Spine Journal

JF - Spine Journal

SN - 1529-9430

IS - 7

ER -