Lumbar Imaging With Reporting Of Epidemiology (LIRE)-Protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial

Jeffrey G. Jarvik, Bryan A. Comstock, Kathryn T. James, Andrew L. Avins, Brian W. Bresnahan, Richard (Rick) Deyo, Patrick H. Luetmer, Janna L. Friedly, Eric N. Meier, Daniel C. Cherkin, Laura S. Gold, Sean D. Rundell, Safwan S. Halabi, David F. Kallmes, Katherine W. Tan, Judith A. Turner, Larry G. Kessler, Danielle C. Lavallee, Kari A. Stephens, Patrick J. Heagerty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic imaging is often the first step in evaluating patients with back pain and likely functions as a "gateway" to a subsequent cascade of interventions. However, lumbar spine imaging frequently reveals incidental findings among normal, pain-free individuals suggesting that treatment of these "abnormalities" may not be warranted. Our prior work suggested that inserting the prevalence of imaging findings in patients without back pain into spine imaging reports may reduce subsequent interventions. We are now conducting a pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial to test the hypothesis that inserting this prevalence data into lumbar spine imaging reports for studies ordered by primary care providers will reduce subsequent spine-related interventions. Methods/design: We are using a stepped wedge design that sequentially randomizes 100 primary care clinics at four health systems to receive either standard lumbar spine imaging reports, or reports containing prevalence data for common imaging findings in patients without back pain. We capture all outcomes passively through the electronic medical record. Our primary outcome is spine-related intervention intensity based on Relative Value Units (RVUs) during the following year. Secondary outcomes include subsequent prescriptions for opioid analgesics and cross-sectional lumbar spine re-imaging. Discussion: If our study shows that adding prevalence data to spine imaging reports decreases subsequent back-related RVUs, this intervention could be easily generalized and applied to other kinds of testing, as well as other conditions where incidental findings may be common. Our study also serves as a model for cluster randomized trials that are minimal risk and highly pragmatic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)157-163
Number of pages7
JournalContemporary Clinical Trials
Volume45
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

Epidemiology
Spine
Back Pain
Incidental Findings
Primary Health Care
Electronic Health Records
Diagnostic Imaging
Opioid Analgesics
Prescriptions
Randomized Controlled Trials
Health

Keywords

  • Back pain
  • Cluster randomized trial
  • Lumbar imaging
  • Pragmatic randomized trial
  • Spine imaging
  • Stepped wedge design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Jarvik, J. G., Comstock, B. A., James, K. T., Avins, A. L., Bresnahan, B. W., Deyo, R. R., ... Heagerty, P. J. (2015). Lumbar Imaging With Reporting Of Epidemiology (LIRE)-Protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 45, 157-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.10.003

Lumbar Imaging With Reporting Of Epidemiology (LIRE)-Protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial. / Jarvik, Jeffrey G.; Comstock, Bryan A.; James, Kathryn T.; Avins, Andrew L.; Bresnahan, Brian W.; Deyo, Richard (Rick); Luetmer, Patrick H.; Friedly, Janna L.; Meier, Eric N.; Cherkin, Daniel C.; Gold, Laura S.; Rundell, Sean D.; Halabi, Safwan S.; Kallmes, David F.; Tan, Katherine W.; Turner, Judith A.; Kessler, Larry G.; Lavallee, Danielle C.; Stephens, Kari A.; Heagerty, Patrick J.

In: Contemporary Clinical Trials, Vol. 45, 01.11.2015, p. 157-163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jarvik, JG, Comstock, BA, James, KT, Avins, AL, Bresnahan, BW, Deyo, RR, Luetmer, PH, Friedly, JL, Meier, EN, Cherkin, DC, Gold, LS, Rundell, SD, Halabi, SS, Kallmes, DF, Tan, KW, Turner, JA, Kessler, LG, Lavallee, DC, Stephens, KA & Heagerty, PJ 2015, 'Lumbar Imaging With Reporting Of Epidemiology (LIRE)-Protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial', Contemporary Clinical Trials, vol. 45, pp. 157-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.10.003
Jarvik, Jeffrey G. ; Comstock, Bryan A. ; James, Kathryn T. ; Avins, Andrew L. ; Bresnahan, Brian W. ; Deyo, Richard (Rick) ; Luetmer, Patrick H. ; Friedly, Janna L. ; Meier, Eric N. ; Cherkin, Daniel C. ; Gold, Laura S. ; Rundell, Sean D. ; Halabi, Safwan S. ; Kallmes, David F. ; Tan, Katherine W. ; Turner, Judith A. ; Kessler, Larry G. ; Lavallee, Danielle C. ; Stephens, Kari A. ; Heagerty, Patrick J. / Lumbar Imaging With Reporting Of Epidemiology (LIRE)-Protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial. In: Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2015 ; Vol. 45. pp. 157-163.
@article{0d4bca930be4453c991d9e6e1fadd4ba,
title = "Lumbar Imaging With Reporting Of Epidemiology (LIRE)-Protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial",
abstract = "Background: Diagnostic imaging is often the first step in evaluating patients with back pain and likely functions as a {"}gateway{"} to a subsequent cascade of interventions. However, lumbar spine imaging frequently reveals incidental findings among normal, pain-free individuals suggesting that treatment of these {"}abnormalities{"} may not be warranted. Our prior work suggested that inserting the prevalence of imaging findings in patients without back pain into spine imaging reports may reduce subsequent interventions. We are now conducting a pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial to test the hypothesis that inserting this prevalence data into lumbar spine imaging reports for studies ordered by primary care providers will reduce subsequent spine-related interventions. Methods/design: We are using a stepped wedge design that sequentially randomizes 100 primary care clinics at four health systems to receive either standard lumbar spine imaging reports, or reports containing prevalence data for common imaging findings in patients without back pain. We capture all outcomes passively through the electronic medical record. Our primary outcome is spine-related intervention intensity based on Relative Value Units (RVUs) during the following year. Secondary outcomes include subsequent prescriptions for opioid analgesics and cross-sectional lumbar spine re-imaging. Discussion: If our study shows that adding prevalence data to spine imaging reports decreases subsequent back-related RVUs, this intervention could be easily generalized and applied to other kinds of testing, as well as other conditions where incidental findings may be common. Our study also serves as a model for cluster randomized trials that are minimal risk and highly pragmatic.",
keywords = "Back pain, Cluster randomized trial, Lumbar imaging, Pragmatic randomized trial, Spine imaging, Stepped wedge design",
author = "Jarvik, {Jeffrey G.} and Comstock, {Bryan A.} and James, {Kathryn T.} and Avins, {Andrew L.} and Bresnahan, {Brian W.} and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Luetmer, {Patrick H.} and Friedly, {Janna L.} and Meier, {Eric N.} and Cherkin, {Daniel C.} and Gold, {Laura S.} and Rundell, {Sean D.} and Halabi, {Safwan S.} and Kallmes, {David F.} and Tan, {Katherine W.} and Turner, {Judith A.} and Kessler, {Larry G.} and Lavallee, {Danielle C.} and Stephens, {Kari A.} and Heagerty, {Patrick J.}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cct.2015.10.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "157--163",
journal = "Contemporary Clinical Trials",
issn = "1551-7144",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lumbar Imaging With Reporting Of Epidemiology (LIRE)-Protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial

AU - Jarvik, Jeffrey G.

AU - Comstock, Bryan A.

AU - James, Kathryn T.

AU - Avins, Andrew L.

AU - Bresnahan, Brian W.

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Luetmer, Patrick H.

AU - Friedly, Janna L.

AU - Meier, Eric N.

AU - Cherkin, Daniel C.

AU - Gold, Laura S.

AU - Rundell, Sean D.

AU - Halabi, Safwan S.

AU - Kallmes, David F.

AU - Tan, Katherine W.

AU - Turner, Judith A.

AU - Kessler, Larry G.

AU - Lavallee, Danielle C.

AU - Stephens, Kari A.

AU - Heagerty, Patrick J.

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Background: Diagnostic imaging is often the first step in evaluating patients with back pain and likely functions as a "gateway" to a subsequent cascade of interventions. However, lumbar spine imaging frequently reveals incidental findings among normal, pain-free individuals suggesting that treatment of these "abnormalities" may not be warranted. Our prior work suggested that inserting the prevalence of imaging findings in patients without back pain into spine imaging reports may reduce subsequent interventions. We are now conducting a pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial to test the hypothesis that inserting this prevalence data into lumbar spine imaging reports for studies ordered by primary care providers will reduce subsequent spine-related interventions. Methods/design: We are using a stepped wedge design that sequentially randomizes 100 primary care clinics at four health systems to receive either standard lumbar spine imaging reports, or reports containing prevalence data for common imaging findings in patients without back pain. We capture all outcomes passively through the electronic medical record. Our primary outcome is spine-related intervention intensity based on Relative Value Units (RVUs) during the following year. Secondary outcomes include subsequent prescriptions for opioid analgesics and cross-sectional lumbar spine re-imaging. Discussion: If our study shows that adding prevalence data to spine imaging reports decreases subsequent back-related RVUs, this intervention could be easily generalized and applied to other kinds of testing, as well as other conditions where incidental findings may be common. Our study also serves as a model for cluster randomized trials that are minimal risk and highly pragmatic.

AB - Background: Diagnostic imaging is often the first step in evaluating patients with back pain and likely functions as a "gateway" to a subsequent cascade of interventions. However, lumbar spine imaging frequently reveals incidental findings among normal, pain-free individuals suggesting that treatment of these "abnormalities" may not be warranted. Our prior work suggested that inserting the prevalence of imaging findings in patients without back pain into spine imaging reports may reduce subsequent interventions. We are now conducting a pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial to test the hypothesis that inserting this prevalence data into lumbar spine imaging reports for studies ordered by primary care providers will reduce subsequent spine-related interventions. Methods/design: We are using a stepped wedge design that sequentially randomizes 100 primary care clinics at four health systems to receive either standard lumbar spine imaging reports, or reports containing prevalence data for common imaging findings in patients without back pain. We capture all outcomes passively through the electronic medical record. Our primary outcome is spine-related intervention intensity based on Relative Value Units (RVUs) during the following year. Secondary outcomes include subsequent prescriptions for opioid analgesics and cross-sectional lumbar spine re-imaging. Discussion: If our study shows that adding prevalence data to spine imaging reports decreases subsequent back-related RVUs, this intervention could be easily generalized and applied to other kinds of testing, as well as other conditions where incidental findings may be common. Our study also serves as a model for cluster randomized trials that are minimal risk and highly pragmatic.

KW - Back pain

KW - Cluster randomized trial

KW - Lumbar imaging

KW - Pragmatic randomized trial

KW - Spine imaging

KW - Stepped wedge design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946576107&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946576107&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cct.2015.10.003

DO - 10.1016/j.cct.2015.10.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 26493088

AN - SCOPUS:84946576107

VL - 45

SP - 157

EP - 163

JO - Contemporary Clinical Trials

JF - Contemporary Clinical Trials

SN - 1551-7144

ER -