Longitudinal assessment of distress among veterans with incidental pulmonary nodules

Christopher G. Slatore, Renda Soylemez Wiener, Sara E. Golden, David H. Au, Linda Ganzini

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Rationale: Millions of patients are diagnosed with pulmonary nodules every year. Increased distress may be a common harm, but methods of mitigating this distress are unclear. Objectives: We aimed to determine whether high-quality communication regarding the discovery of a pulmonary nodule is associated with a lower level of patient distress. Methods: We conducted a prospective, repeated-measures cohort study of 121 patients with newly reported, incidentally detected pulmonary nodules. The primary exposure was participant-reported quality of communication regarding the nodule. Secondary exposures included communication measures regarding participants' values, preferences, and decision making. The main outcome was nodule-related distress measured using the Impact of Event Scale. We used adjusted generalized estimating equations to measure the association between nodule communication quality and at least mild distress. Measurements and Main Results: Most participants (57%) reported at least mild distress at least once. While average distress scores decreased over time, one-fourth still had elevated distress after 2 years of surveillance for a nodule. The average calculated risk of cancer at baseline was 10% (SD, 13%), but 52.4% believed they had a greater than 30% risk of lung cancer at baseline, and this percentage remained fairly constant at all visits. High-quality nodule communication was associated with decreased odds of distress (adjusted odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.73). Lower-quality communication processes regarding participants' values and preferences were also associated with increased odds of distress, but concordance between the actual and preferred decision-making roles was not. Conclusions: Among patients with incidentally discovered pulmonary nodules, distress is common and persistent for about 25%. Many participants substantially overestimate their risk of lung cancer. Incorporating patients' values and preferences into communication about a pulmonary nodule and its evaluation may mitigate distress.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1983-1991
    Number of pages9
    JournalAnnals of the American Thoracic Society
    Volume13
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    Veterans
    Communication
    Lung
    Lung Neoplasms
    Decision Making
    Patient Preference
    Cohort Studies
    Odds Ratio
    Confidence Intervals
    Neoplasms

    Keywords

    • Health communication
    • Lung cancer
    • Pulmonary nodule

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Medicine(all)
    • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

    Cite this

    Longitudinal assessment of distress among veterans with incidental pulmonary nodules. / Slatore, Christopher G.; Wiener, Renda Soylemez; Golden, Sara E.; Au, David H.; Ganzini, Linda.

    In: Annals of the American Thoracic Society, Vol. 13, No. 11, 01.11.2016, p. 1983-1991.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Slatore, Christopher G. ; Wiener, Renda Soylemez ; Golden, Sara E. ; Au, David H. ; Ganzini, Linda. / Longitudinal assessment of distress among veterans with incidental pulmonary nodules. In: Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2016 ; Vol. 13, No. 11. pp. 1983-1991.
    @article{aa43c4d695154354a49a2ca1675ed40b,
    title = "Longitudinal assessment of distress among veterans with incidental pulmonary nodules",
    abstract = "Rationale: Millions of patients are diagnosed with pulmonary nodules every year. Increased distress may be a common harm, but methods of mitigating this distress are unclear. Objectives: We aimed to determine whether high-quality communication regarding the discovery of a pulmonary nodule is associated with a lower level of patient distress. Methods: We conducted a prospective, repeated-measures cohort study of 121 patients with newly reported, incidentally detected pulmonary nodules. The primary exposure was participant-reported quality of communication regarding the nodule. Secondary exposures included communication measures regarding participants' values, preferences, and decision making. The main outcome was nodule-related distress measured using the Impact of Event Scale. We used adjusted generalized estimating equations to measure the association between nodule communication quality and at least mild distress. Measurements and Main Results: Most participants (57{\%}) reported at least mild distress at least once. While average distress scores decreased over time, one-fourth still had elevated distress after 2 years of surveillance for a nodule. The average calculated risk of cancer at baseline was 10{\%} (SD, 13{\%}), but 52.4{\%} believed they had a greater than 30{\%} risk of lung cancer at baseline, and this percentage remained fairly constant at all visits. High-quality nodule communication was associated with decreased odds of distress (adjusted odds ratio, 0.42; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.24-0.73). Lower-quality communication processes regarding participants' values and preferences were also associated with increased odds of distress, but concordance between the actual and preferred decision-making roles was not. Conclusions: Among patients with incidentally discovered pulmonary nodules, distress is common and persistent for about 25{\%}. Many participants substantially overestimate their risk of lung cancer. Incorporating patients' values and preferences into communication about a pulmonary nodule and its evaluation may mitigate distress.",
    keywords = "Health communication, Lung cancer, Pulmonary nodule",
    author = "Slatore, {Christopher G.} and Wiener, {Renda Soylemez} and Golden, {Sara E.} and Au, {David H.} and Linda Ganzini",
    year = "2016",
    month = "11",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1513/AnnalsATS.201607-555OC",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "13",
    pages = "1983--1991",
    journal = "Annals of the American Thoracic Society",
    issn = "2325-6621",
    publisher = "American Thoracic Society",
    number = "11",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Longitudinal assessment of distress among veterans with incidental pulmonary nodules

    AU - Slatore, Christopher G.

    AU - Wiener, Renda Soylemez

    AU - Golden, Sara E.

    AU - Au, David H.

    AU - Ganzini, Linda

    PY - 2016/11/1

    Y1 - 2016/11/1

    N2 - Rationale: Millions of patients are diagnosed with pulmonary nodules every year. Increased distress may be a common harm, but methods of mitigating this distress are unclear. Objectives: We aimed to determine whether high-quality communication regarding the discovery of a pulmonary nodule is associated with a lower level of patient distress. Methods: We conducted a prospective, repeated-measures cohort study of 121 patients with newly reported, incidentally detected pulmonary nodules. The primary exposure was participant-reported quality of communication regarding the nodule. Secondary exposures included communication measures regarding participants' values, preferences, and decision making. The main outcome was nodule-related distress measured using the Impact of Event Scale. We used adjusted generalized estimating equations to measure the association between nodule communication quality and at least mild distress. Measurements and Main Results: Most participants (57%) reported at least mild distress at least once. While average distress scores decreased over time, one-fourth still had elevated distress after 2 years of surveillance for a nodule. The average calculated risk of cancer at baseline was 10% (SD, 13%), but 52.4% believed they had a greater than 30% risk of lung cancer at baseline, and this percentage remained fairly constant at all visits. High-quality nodule communication was associated with decreased odds of distress (adjusted odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.73). Lower-quality communication processes regarding participants' values and preferences were also associated with increased odds of distress, but concordance between the actual and preferred decision-making roles was not. Conclusions: Among patients with incidentally discovered pulmonary nodules, distress is common and persistent for about 25%. Many participants substantially overestimate their risk of lung cancer. Incorporating patients' values and preferences into communication about a pulmonary nodule and its evaluation may mitigate distress.

    AB - Rationale: Millions of patients are diagnosed with pulmonary nodules every year. Increased distress may be a common harm, but methods of mitigating this distress are unclear. Objectives: We aimed to determine whether high-quality communication regarding the discovery of a pulmonary nodule is associated with a lower level of patient distress. Methods: We conducted a prospective, repeated-measures cohort study of 121 patients with newly reported, incidentally detected pulmonary nodules. The primary exposure was participant-reported quality of communication regarding the nodule. Secondary exposures included communication measures regarding participants' values, preferences, and decision making. The main outcome was nodule-related distress measured using the Impact of Event Scale. We used adjusted generalized estimating equations to measure the association between nodule communication quality and at least mild distress. Measurements and Main Results: Most participants (57%) reported at least mild distress at least once. While average distress scores decreased over time, one-fourth still had elevated distress after 2 years of surveillance for a nodule. The average calculated risk of cancer at baseline was 10% (SD, 13%), but 52.4% believed they had a greater than 30% risk of lung cancer at baseline, and this percentage remained fairly constant at all visits. High-quality nodule communication was associated with decreased odds of distress (adjusted odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.73). Lower-quality communication processes regarding participants' values and preferences were also associated with increased odds of distress, but concordance between the actual and preferred decision-making roles was not. Conclusions: Among patients with incidentally discovered pulmonary nodules, distress is common and persistent for about 25%. Many participants substantially overestimate their risk of lung cancer. Incorporating patients' values and preferences into communication about a pulmonary nodule and its evaluation may mitigate distress.

    KW - Health communication

    KW - Lung cancer

    KW - Pulmonary nodule

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995446660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995446660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201607-555OC

    DO - 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201607-555OC

    M3 - Article

    VL - 13

    SP - 1983

    EP - 1991

    JO - Annals of the American Thoracic Society

    JF - Annals of the American Thoracic Society

    SN - 2325-6621

    IS - 11

    ER -