Local perspectives and global archetypes in scenario development

Chloe B. Wardropper, Sean Gillon, Amber S. Mase, Emily A. McKinney, Stephen R. Carpenter, Adena R. Rissman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Contrasting social-ecological scenarios can help stakeholders envision potential futures and navigate change and uncertainty. Scenario developers integrate stakeholder perceptions into storylines to increase scenario relevance and plausibility while relying on archetypes of change from scenario literature to enrich narratives. This research examines the contributions of local perspectives and global archetypes to scenario development through a case study of a regional scenario project, Yahara 2070, in Wisconsin, USA. Interviews with 50 Yahara watershed stakeholders and 5 members of the project's scenario development team were examined to compare themes from scenario archetypes with local perspectives on how change is expected to occur. We next examined how these two sources of inspiration for trajectories of change were used in the development of the Yahara 2070 scenarios. Both global archetypes and local stakeholders emphasized social values, market forces, and policy reform as influences in determining the future, which were reflected in Yahara 2070. However, stakeholders were less likely to mention institutional breakdown, an important theme from the global scenarios literature that was included in Yahara 2070. This research offers a new approach to analyzing similarities and differences between scenarios’ narratives and local perspectives. Scenario development may involve tensions between the goals of reflecting stakeholder views and including narratives from the global scenarios literature that may be useful for creating divergent model trajectories and addressing dramatic change into the future. To improve scenario development, scenario projects should document the development process in academic and nonacademic venues, explicitly highlighting sources and constraints in storyline development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number12
JournalEcology and Society
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

stakeholder
trajectory
policy reform
watershed
market
project

Keywords

  • Scenario archetypes
  • Scenario development
  • Social and environmental change
  • Stakeholder perspectives
  • Watershed futures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Wardropper, C. B., Gillon, S., Mase, A. S., McKinney, E. A., Carpenter, S. R., & Rissman, A. R. (2016). Local perspectives and global archetypes in scenario development. Ecology and Society, 21(2), [12]. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08384-210212

Local perspectives and global archetypes in scenario development. / Wardropper, Chloe B.; Gillon, Sean; Mase, Amber S.; McKinney, Emily A.; Carpenter, Stephen R.; Rissman, Adena R.

In: Ecology and Society, Vol. 21, No. 2, 12, 01.01.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wardropper, CB, Gillon, S, Mase, AS, McKinney, EA, Carpenter, SR & Rissman, AR 2016, 'Local perspectives and global archetypes in scenario development', Ecology and Society, vol. 21, no. 2, 12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08384-210212
Wardropper CB, Gillon S, Mase AS, McKinney EA, Carpenter SR, Rissman AR. Local perspectives and global archetypes in scenario development. Ecology and Society. 2016 Jan 1;21(2). 12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08384-210212
Wardropper, Chloe B. ; Gillon, Sean ; Mase, Amber S. ; McKinney, Emily A. ; Carpenter, Stephen R. ; Rissman, Adena R. / Local perspectives and global archetypes in scenario development. In: Ecology and Society. 2016 ; Vol. 21, No. 2.
@article{e652340f3c5c4b0b8ff31800ea27b8e5,
title = "Local perspectives and global archetypes in scenario development",
abstract = "Contrasting social-ecological scenarios can help stakeholders envision potential futures and navigate change and uncertainty. Scenario developers integrate stakeholder perceptions into storylines to increase scenario relevance and plausibility while relying on archetypes of change from scenario literature to enrich narratives. This research examines the contributions of local perspectives and global archetypes to scenario development through a case study of a regional scenario project, Yahara 2070, in Wisconsin, USA. Interviews with 50 Yahara watershed stakeholders and 5 members of the project's scenario development team were examined to compare themes from scenario archetypes with local perspectives on how change is expected to occur. We next examined how these two sources of inspiration for trajectories of change were used in the development of the Yahara 2070 scenarios. Both global archetypes and local stakeholders emphasized social values, market forces, and policy reform as influences in determining the future, which were reflected in Yahara 2070. However, stakeholders were less likely to mention institutional breakdown, an important theme from the global scenarios literature that was included in Yahara 2070. This research offers a new approach to analyzing similarities and differences between scenarios’ narratives and local perspectives. Scenario development may involve tensions between the goals of reflecting stakeholder views and including narratives from the global scenarios literature that may be useful for creating divergent model trajectories and addressing dramatic change into the future. To improve scenario development, scenario projects should document the development process in academic and nonacademic venues, explicitly highlighting sources and constraints in storyline development.",
keywords = "Scenario archetypes, Scenario development, Social and environmental change, Stakeholder perspectives, Watershed futures",
author = "Wardropper, {Chloe B.} and Sean Gillon and Mase, {Amber S.} and McKinney, {Emily A.} and Carpenter, {Stephen R.} and Rissman, {Adena R.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5751/ES-08384-210212",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
journal = "Ecology and Society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Local perspectives and global archetypes in scenario development

AU - Wardropper, Chloe B.

AU - Gillon, Sean

AU - Mase, Amber S.

AU - McKinney, Emily A.

AU - Carpenter, Stephen R.

AU - Rissman, Adena R.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Contrasting social-ecological scenarios can help stakeholders envision potential futures and navigate change and uncertainty. Scenario developers integrate stakeholder perceptions into storylines to increase scenario relevance and plausibility while relying on archetypes of change from scenario literature to enrich narratives. This research examines the contributions of local perspectives and global archetypes to scenario development through a case study of a regional scenario project, Yahara 2070, in Wisconsin, USA. Interviews with 50 Yahara watershed stakeholders and 5 members of the project's scenario development team were examined to compare themes from scenario archetypes with local perspectives on how change is expected to occur. We next examined how these two sources of inspiration for trajectories of change were used in the development of the Yahara 2070 scenarios. Both global archetypes and local stakeholders emphasized social values, market forces, and policy reform as influences in determining the future, which were reflected in Yahara 2070. However, stakeholders were less likely to mention institutional breakdown, an important theme from the global scenarios literature that was included in Yahara 2070. This research offers a new approach to analyzing similarities and differences between scenarios’ narratives and local perspectives. Scenario development may involve tensions between the goals of reflecting stakeholder views and including narratives from the global scenarios literature that may be useful for creating divergent model trajectories and addressing dramatic change into the future. To improve scenario development, scenario projects should document the development process in academic and nonacademic venues, explicitly highlighting sources and constraints in storyline development.

AB - Contrasting social-ecological scenarios can help stakeholders envision potential futures and navigate change and uncertainty. Scenario developers integrate stakeholder perceptions into storylines to increase scenario relevance and plausibility while relying on archetypes of change from scenario literature to enrich narratives. This research examines the contributions of local perspectives and global archetypes to scenario development through a case study of a regional scenario project, Yahara 2070, in Wisconsin, USA. Interviews with 50 Yahara watershed stakeholders and 5 members of the project's scenario development team were examined to compare themes from scenario archetypes with local perspectives on how change is expected to occur. We next examined how these two sources of inspiration for trajectories of change were used in the development of the Yahara 2070 scenarios. Both global archetypes and local stakeholders emphasized social values, market forces, and policy reform as influences in determining the future, which were reflected in Yahara 2070. However, stakeholders were less likely to mention institutional breakdown, an important theme from the global scenarios literature that was included in Yahara 2070. This research offers a new approach to analyzing similarities and differences between scenarios’ narratives and local perspectives. Scenario development may involve tensions between the goals of reflecting stakeholder views and including narratives from the global scenarios literature that may be useful for creating divergent model trajectories and addressing dramatic change into the future. To improve scenario development, scenario projects should document the development process in academic and nonacademic venues, explicitly highlighting sources and constraints in storyline development.

KW - Scenario archetypes

KW - Scenario development

KW - Social and environmental change

KW - Stakeholder perspectives

KW - Watershed futures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976563752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84976563752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5751/ES-08384-210212

DO - 10.5751/ES-08384-210212

M3 - Article

VL - 21

JO - Ecology and Society

JF - Ecology and Society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 2

M1 - 12

ER -