Local Media Influence on Opting Out From an Exception From Informed Consent Trial

Maria J. Nelson, Nicole Deiorio, Terri Schmidt, Denise Griffiths, Mohamud Ramzan Daya, Liana Haywood, Dana Zive, Craig Newgard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objective: News media are used for community education and notification in exception from informed consent clinical trials, yet their effectiveness as an added safeguard in such research remains unknown. We assessed the number of callers requesting opt-out bracelets after each local media report and described the errors and content within each media report. Methods: We undertook a descriptive analysis of local media trial coverage (newspaper, television, radio, and Web log) and opt-out requests during a 41-month period at a single site participating in an exception from informed consent out-of-hospital trial. Two nontrial investigators independently assessed 41 content-based media variables (including background, trial information, graphics, errors, publication information, and assessment) with a standardized, semiqualitative data collection tool. Major errors were considered serious misrepresentation of the trial purpose or protocol, whereas minor errors included misinformation unlikely to mislead the lay reader about the trial. We plotted the temporal relationship between opt-out bracelet requests and media reports. Descriptive information about the news sources and the trial coverage are presented. Results: We collected 39 trial-related media reports (33 newspaper, 1 television, 1 radio, and 4 blogs). There were 13 errors in 9 (23%) publications, 7 of which were major and 6 minor. Of 384 requests for 710 bracelets, 310 requests (80%) occurred within 4 days after trial media coverage. Graphic timeline representation of the data suggested a close association between media reports about the trial and requests for opt-out bracelets. Conclusion: According to results from a single site, local media coverage for an exception from informed consent clinical trial had a substantial portion of errors and appeared closely associated with opt-out requests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume55
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Informed Consent
Newspapers
Television
Radio
Publications
Blogging
Clinical Trials
Communication
Research Personnel
Education
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Local Media Influence on Opting Out From an Exception From Informed Consent Trial. / Nelson, Maria J.; Deiorio, Nicole; Schmidt, Terri; Griffiths, Denise; Daya, Mohamud Ramzan; Haywood, Liana; Zive, Dana; Newgard, Craig.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 55, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nelson, Maria J. ; Deiorio, Nicole ; Schmidt, Terri ; Griffiths, Denise ; Daya, Mohamud Ramzan ; Haywood, Liana ; Zive, Dana ; Newgard, Craig. / Local Media Influence on Opting Out From an Exception From Informed Consent Trial. In: Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 55, No. 1. pp. 1-8.
@article{57d095af88df46009504ebd5d67a19bd,
title = "Local Media Influence on Opting Out From an Exception From Informed Consent Trial",
abstract = "Study objective: News media are used for community education and notification in exception from informed consent clinical trials, yet their effectiveness as an added safeguard in such research remains unknown. We assessed the number of callers requesting opt-out bracelets after each local media report and described the errors and content within each media report. Methods: We undertook a descriptive analysis of local media trial coverage (newspaper, television, radio, and Web log) and opt-out requests during a 41-month period at a single site participating in an exception from informed consent out-of-hospital trial. Two nontrial investigators independently assessed 41 content-based media variables (including background, trial information, graphics, errors, publication information, and assessment) with a standardized, semiqualitative data collection tool. Major errors were considered serious misrepresentation of the trial purpose or protocol, whereas minor errors included misinformation unlikely to mislead the lay reader about the trial. We plotted the temporal relationship between opt-out bracelet requests and media reports. Descriptive information about the news sources and the trial coverage are presented. Results: We collected 39 trial-related media reports (33 newspaper, 1 television, 1 radio, and 4 blogs). There were 13 errors in 9 (23{\%}) publications, 7 of which were major and 6 minor. Of 384 requests for 710 bracelets, 310 requests (80{\%}) occurred within 4 days after trial media coverage. Graphic timeline representation of the data suggested a close association between media reports about the trial and requests for opt-out bracelets. Conclusion: According to results from a single site, local media coverage for an exception from informed consent clinical trial had a substantial portion of errors and appeared closely associated with opt-out requests.",
author = "Nelson, {Maria J.} and Nicole Deiorio and Terri Schmidt and Denise Griffiths and Daya, {Mohamud Ramzan} and Liana Haywood and Dana Zive and Craig Newgard",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.05.028",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Local Media Influence on Opting Out From an Exception From Informed Consent Trial

AU - Nelson, Maria J.

AU - Deiorio, Nicole

AU - Schmidt, Terri

AU - Griffiths, Denise

AU - Daya, Mohamud Ramzan

AU - Haywood, Liana

AU - Zive, Dana

AU - Newgard, Craig

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - Study objective: News media are used for community education and notification in exception from informed consent clinical trials, yet their effectiveness as an added safeguard in such research remains unknown. We assessed the number of callers requesting opt-out bracelets after each local media report and described the errors and content within each media report. Methods: We undertook a descriptive analysis of local media trial coverage (newspaper, television, radio, and Web log) and opt-out requests during a 41-month period at a single site participating in an exception from informed consent out-of-hospital trial. Two nontrial investigators independently assessed 41 content-based media variables (including background, trial information, graphics, errors, publication information, and assessment) with a standardized, semiqualitative data collection tool. Major errors were considered serious misrepresentation of the trial purpose or protocol, whereas minor errors included misinformation unlikely to mislead the lay reader about the trial. We plotted the temporal relationship between opt-out bracelet requests and media reports. Descriptive information about the news sources and the trial coverage are presented. Results: We collected 39 trial-related media reports (33 newspaper, 1 television, 1 radio, and 4 blogs). There were 13 errors in 9 (23%) publications, 7 of which were major and 6 minor. Of 384 requests for 710 bracelets, 310 requests (80%) occurred within 4 days after trial media coverage. Graphic timeline representation of the data suggested a close association between media reports about the trial and requests for opt-out bracelets. Conclusion: According to results from a single site, local media coverage for an exception from informed consent clinical trial had a substantial portion of errors and appeared closely associated with opt-out requests.

AB - Study objective: News media are used for community education and notification in exception from informed consent clinical trials, yet their effectiveness as an added safeguard in such research remains unknown. We assessed the number of callers requesting opt-out bracelets after each local media report and described the errors and content within each media report. Methods: We undertook a descriptive analysis of local media trial coverage (newspaper, television, radio, and Web log) and opt-out requests during a 41-month period at a single site participating in an exception from informed consent out-of-hospital trial. Two nontrial investigators independently assessed 41 content-based media variables (including background, trial information, graphics, errors, publication information, and assessment) with a standardized, semiqualitative data collection tool. Major errors were considered serious misrepresentation of the trial purpose or protocol, whereas minor errors included misinformation unlikely to mislead the lay reader about the trial. We plotted the temporal relationship between opt-out bracelet requests and media reports. Descriptive information about the news sources and the trial coverage are presented. Results: We collected 39 trial-related media reports (33 newspaper, 1 television, 1 radio, and 4 blogs). There were 13 errors in 9 (23%) publications, 7 of which were major and 6 minor. Of 384 requests for 710 bracelets, 310 requests (80%) occurred within 4 days after trial media coverage. Graphic timeline representation of the data suggested a close association between media reports about the trial and requests for opt-out bracelets. Conclusion: According to results from a single site, local media coverage for an exception from informed consent clinical trial had a substantial portion of errors and appeared closely associated with opt-out requests.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72149083570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=72149083570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.05.028

DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.05.028

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 1

ER -