Limited abdominal MRI in the evaluation of acute right upper quadrant pain

Karen Oh, M. Gilfeather, A. Kennedy, C. Glastonbury, D. Green, W. Brant, H. C. Yoon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We investigated whether limited abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is as effective as transabdominal ultrasound (US) in evaluating patients presenting with acute right upper quadrant pain. Methods: Twenty-four patients underwent evaluation with a limited abdominal MRI using single-shot fast spin-echo sequences and a right upper quadrant US within 24 h. Two MRI and two US readers independently evaluated the images for gallstones, gallbladder wall thickness, pericholecystic fluid, acute cholecystitis, visualization of the common bile duct, and requests for further imaging. US and MRI findings were compared. Surgical pathology was the gold standard. Results: MRI and US demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the diagnosis of gallbladder wall thickening, the presence of gallstones or pericholecystic fluid, or the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis (p > 0.05). The sensitivity of both for acute cholecystitis was 50%, with specificities of 89% and 86% for US and MRI, respectively. US readers more frequently requested additional tests and displayed more variability in whether they could adequately see the common bile duct. Conclusion: Limited MRI is equivalent to US in diagnosing gallstones, gallbladder wall thickening, pericholecystic fluid, and acute cholecystitis in patients presenting with symptoms of acute right upper quadrant pain. Especially in sonographically challenging patients, limited MRI may provide a faster, easier method of diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)643-651
Number of pages9
JournalAbdominal Imaging
Volume28
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Pain
Acute Cholecystitis
Gallstones
Gallbladder
Common Bile Duct
Surgical Pathology

Keywords

  • Gallbladder, magnetic resonance imaging
  • Gallbladder, ultrasound
  • Magnetic resonance, comparative studies
  • Ultrasound, comparative studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Urology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Oh, K., Gilfeather, M., Kennedy, A., Glastonbury, C., Green, D., Brant, W., & Yoon, H. C. (2003). Limited abdominal MRI in the evaluation of acute right upper quadrant pain. Abdominal Imaging, 28(5), 643-651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-003-0037-7

Limited abdominal MRI in the evaluation of acute right upper quadrant pain. / Oh, Karen; Gilfeather, M.; Kennedy, A.; Glastonbury, C.; Green, D.; Brant, W.; Yoon, H. C.

In: Abdominal Imaging, Vol. 28, No. 5, 09.2003, p. 643-651.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oh, K, Gilfeather, M, Kennedy, A, Glastonbury, C, Green, D, Brant, W & Yoon, HC 2003, 'Limited abdominal MRI in the evaluation of acute right upper quadrant pain', Abdominal Imaging, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 643-651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-003-0037-7
Oh K, Gilfeather M, Kennedy A, Glastonbury C, Green D, Brant W et al. Limited abdominal MRI in the evaluation of acute right upper quadrant pain. Abdominal Imaging. 2003 Sep;28(5):643-651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-003-0037-7
Oh, Karen ; Gilfeather, M. ; Kennedy, A. ; Glastonbury, C. ; Green, D. ; Brant, W. ; Yoon, H. C. / Limited abdominal MRI in the evaluation of acute right upper quadrant pain. In: Abdominal Imaging. 2003 ; Vol. 28, No. 5. pp. 643-651.
@article{e13da193b0cd4e9d8f2ee643317a9645,
title = "Limited abdominal MRI in the evaluation of acute right upper quadrant pain",
abstract = "Background: We investigated whether limited abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is as effective as transabdominal ultrasound (US) in evaluating patients presenting with acute right upper quadrant pain. Methods: Twenty-four patients underwent evaluation with a limited abdominal MRI using single-shot fast spin-echo sequences and a right upper quadrant US within 24 h. Two MRI and two US readers independently evaluated the images for gallstones, gallbladder wall thickness, pericholecystic fluid, acute cholecystitis, visualization of the common bile duct, and requests for further imaging. US and MRI findings were compared. Surgical pathology was the gold standard. Results: MRI and US demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the diagnosis of gallbladder wall thickening, the presence of gallstones or pericholecystic fluid, or the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis (p > 0.05). The sensitivity of both for acute cholecystitis was 50{\%}, with specificities of 89{\%} and 86{\%} for US and MRI, respectively. US readers more frequently requested additional tests and displayed more variability in whether they could adequately see the common bile duct. Conclusion: Limited MRI is equivalent to US in diagnosing gallstones, gallbladder wall thickening, pericholecystic fluid, and acute cholecystitis in patients presenting with symptoms of acute right upper quadrant pain. Especially in sonographically challenging patients, limited MRI may provide a faster, easier method of diagnosis.",
keywords = "Gallbladder, magnetic resonance imaging, Gallbladder, ultrasound, Magnetic resonance, comparative studies, Ultrasound, comparative studies",
author = "Karen Oh and M. Gilfeather and A. Kennedy and C. Glastonbury and D. Green and W. Brant and Yoon, {H. C.}",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s00261-003-0037-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "643--651",
journal = "Abdominal Radiology",
issn = "2366-004X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Limited abdominal MRI in the evaluation of acute right upper quadrant pain

AU - Oh, Karen

AU - Gilfeather, M.

AU - Kennedy, A.

AU - Glastonbury, C.

AU - Green, D.

AU - Brant, W.

AU - Yoon, H. C.

PY - 2003/9

Y1 - 2003/9

N2 - Background: We investigated whether limited abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is as effective as transabdominal ultrasound (US) in evaluating patients presenting with acute right upper quadrant pain. Methods: Twenty-four patients underwent evaluation with a limited abdominal MRI using single-shot fast spin-echo sequences and a right upper quadrant US within 24 h. Two MRI and two US readers independently evaluated the images for gallstones, gallbladder wall thickness, pericholecystic fluid, acute cholecystitis, visualization of the common bile duct, and requests for further imaging. US and MRI findings were compared. Surgical pathology was the gold standard. Results: MRI and US demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the diagnosis of gallbladder wall thickening, the presence of gallstones or pericholecystic fluid, or the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis (p > 0.05). The sensitivity of both for acute cholecystitis was 50%, with specificities of 89% and 86% for US and MRI, respectively. US readers more frequently requested additional tests and displayed more variability in whether they could adequately see the common bile duct. Conclusion: Limited MRI is equivalent to US in diagnosing gallstones, gallbladder wall thickening, pericholecystic fluid, and acute cholecystitis in patients presenting with symptoms of acute right upper quadrant pain. Especially in sonographically challenging patients, limited MRI may provide a faster, easier method of diagnosis.

AB - Background: We investigated whether limited abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is as effective as transabdominal ultrasound (US) in evaluating patients presenting with acute right upper quadrant pain. Methods: Twenty-four patients underwent evaluation with a limited abdominal MRI using single-shot fast spin-echo sequences and a right upper quadrant US within 24 h. Two MRI and two US readers independently evaluated the images for gallstones, gallbladder wall thickness, pericholecystic fluid, acute cholecystitis, visualization of the common bile duct, and requests for further imaging. US and MRI findings were compared. Surgical pathology was the gold standard. Results: MRI and US demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the diagnosis of gallbladder wall thickening, the presence of gallstones or pericholecystic fluid, or the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis (p > 0.05). The sensitivity of both for acute cholecystitis was 50%, with specificities of 89% and 86% for US and MRI, respectively. US readers more frequently requested additional tests and displayed more variability in whether they could adequately see the common bile duct. Conclusion: Limited MRI is equivalent to US in diagnosing gallstones, gallbladder wall thickening, pericholecystic fluid, and acute cholecystitis in patients presenting with symptoms of acute right upper quadrant pain. Especially in sonographically challenging patients, limited MRI may provide a faster, easier method of diagnosis.

KW - Gallbladder, magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Gallbladder, ultrasound

KW - Magnetic resonance, comparative studies

KW - Ultrasound, comparative studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041422582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041422582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00261-003-0037-7

DO - 10.1007/s00261-003-0037-7

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 643

EP - 651

JO - Abdominal Radiology

JF - Abdominal Radiology

SN - 2366-004X

IS - 5

ER -