Length of stay and cost of birth hospitalization

effects of subfertility and ART

Dmitry Dukhovny, Sunah S. Hwang, Daksha Gopal, Howard Cabral, Stacey Missmer, Hafsatou Diop, Eugene Declercq, Judy E. Stern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to measure delivery length of stay (LOS) and cost as proxies for infant morbidity in assisted reproductive technology (ART) and subfertile deliveries. Study Design: Massachusetts singleton births, ≥ 23 weeks gestational age (GA) between 2004 and 2010, were linked with ART data, vital records, and hospital discharges. LOS and costs (2010 US dollars) of infants born to fertile (no ART or indicators of infertility), subfertile (indicators of infertility but no ART), and ART-treated (linked to ART data) deliveries were compared. Least-square means and SE were calculated. Results: Of 345,756 singletons (fertile n = 332,481, subfertile n = 4987, and ART-treated n = 8288), overall LOS was 3.79 ± 0.01, 4.32 ± 0.15, and 4.90 ± 0.04 days, and costs were $2980 ± 6, $3217 ± 58, and $4483 ± 62, respectively. GA and birthweight predicted much of the intergroup difference. Conclusion: Maternal fertility group was not an independent predictor of infant LOS and costs. Prematurity and birthweight were driving factors in resource utilization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Perinatology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Assisted Reproductive Techniques
Infertility
Length of Stay
Hospitalization
Parturition
Costs and Cost Analysis
Gestational Age
Hospital Records
Proxy
Least-Squares Analysis
Fertility
Mothers
Morbidity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Length of stay and cost of birth hospitalization : effects of subfertility and ART. / Dukhovny, Dmitry; Hwang, Sunah S.; Gopal, Daksha; Cabral, Howard; Missmer, Stacey; Diop, Hafsatou; Declercq, Eugene; Stern, Judy E.

In: Journal of Perinatology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dukhovny, Dmitry ; Hwang, Sunah S. ; Gopal, Daksha ; Cabral, Howard ; Missmer, Stacey ; Diop, Hafsatou ; Declercq, Eugene ; Stern, Judy E. / Length of stay and cost of birth hospitalization : effects of subfertility and ART. In: Journal of Perinatology. 2018.
@article{17c5e31b0f974f8dbf014a54d1be7498,
title = "Length of stay and cost of birth hospitalization: effects of subfertility and ART",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of this study is to measure delivery length of stay (LOS) and cost as proxies for infant morbidity in assisted reproductive technology (ART) and subfertile deliveries. Study Design: Massachusetts singleton births, ≥ 23 weeks gestational age (GA) between 2004 and 2010, were linked with ART data, vital records, and hospital discharges. LOS and costs (2010 US dollars) of infants born to fertile (no ART or indicators of infertility), subfertile (indicators of infertility but no ART), and ART-treated (linked to ART data) deliveries were compared. Least-square means and SE were calculated. Results: Of 345,756 singletons (fertile n = 332,481, subfertile n = 4987, and ART-treated n = 8288), overall LOS was 3.79 ± 0.01, 4.32 ± 0.15, and 4.90 ± 0.04 days, and costs were $2980 ± 6, $3217 ± 58, and $4483 ± 62, respectively. GA and birthweight predicted much of the intergroup difference. Conclusion: Maternal fertility group was not an independent predictor of infant LOS and costs. Prematurity and birthweight were driving factors in resource utilization.",
author = "Dmitry Dukhovny and Hwang, {Sunah S.} and Daksha Gopal and Howard Cabral and Stacey Missmer and Hafsatou Diop and Eugene Declercq and Stern, {Judy E.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41372-018-0205-9",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Perinatology",
issn = "0743-8346",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Length of stay and cost of birth hospitalization

T2 - effects of subfertility and ART

AU - Dukhovny, Dmitry

AU - Hwang, Sunah S.

AU - Gopal, Daksha

AU - Cabral, Howard

AU - Missmer, Stacey

AU - Diop, Hafsatou

AU - Declercq, Eugene

AU - Stern, Judy E.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objective: The objective of this study is to measure delivery length of stay (LOS) and cost as proxies for infant morbidity in assisted reproductive technology (ART) and subfertile deliveries. Study Design: Massachusetts singleton births, ≥ 23 weeks gestational age (GA) between 2004 and 2010, were linked with ART data, vital records, and hospital discharges. LOS and costs (2010 US dollars) of infants born to fertile (no ART or indicators of infertility), subfertile (indicators of infertility but no ART), and ART-treated (linked to ART data) deliveries were compared. Least-square means and SE were calculated. Results: Of 345,756 singletons (fertile n = 332,481, subfertile n = 4987, and ART-treated n = 8288), overall LOS was 3.79 ± 0.01, 4.32 ± 0.15, and 4.90 ± 0.04 days, and costs were $2980 ± 6, $3217 ± 58, and $4483 ± 62, respectively. GA and birthweight predicted much of the intergroup difference. Conclusion: Maternal fertility group was not an independent predictor of infant LOS and costs. Prematurity and birthweight were driving factors in resource utilization.

AB - Objective: The objective of this study is to measure delivery length of stay (LOS) and cost as proxies for infant morbidity in assisted reproductive technology (ART) and subfertile deliveries. Study Design: Massachusetts singleton births, ≥ 23 weeks gestational age (GA) between 2004 and 2010, were linked with ART data, vital records, and hospital discharges. LOS and costs (2010 US dollars) of infants born to fertile (no ART or indicators of infertility), subfertile (indicators of infertility but no ART), and ART-treated (linked to ART data) deliveries were compared. Least-square means and SE were calculated. Results: Of 345,756 singletons (fertile n = 332,481, subfertile n = 4987, and ART-treated n = 8288), overall LOS was 3.79 ± 0.01, 4.32 ± 0.15, and 4.90 ± 0.04 days, and costs were $2980 ± 6, $3217 ± 58, and $4483 ± 62, respectively. GA and birthweight predicted much of the intergroup difference. Conclusion: Maternal fertility group was not an independent predictor of infant LOS and costs. Prematurity and birthweight were driving factors in resource utilization.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053331515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053331515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41372-018-0205-9

DO - 10.1038/s41372-018-0205-9

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Perinatology

JF - Journal of Perinatology

SN - 0743-8346

ER -