Laparotomy or drain for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis: Who gets what and why?

Kenneth Azarow, S. H. Ein, B. Shandling, D. Wesson, R. Superina, R. M. Filler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Between 1974 and 1988, 86 newborns with perforated necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were treated by either laparotomy (usually involving a bowel resection and a temporary stoma) or a peritoneal drain under local anesthesia. The survival of babies in the laparotomy group was 57% versus 59% in the drained group. However, for neonates less than 1,000 g survival in the drained group was 69% compared to 22% for the laparotomy group (P <.01). As the weight of the babies increased over 1,000 g, the survival in the laparotomy group increased to 67%. There was no significant increase in survival in infants over 1,500 g. The highest neonatal mortality risk is generally found among babies weighing less than 1,000 g at birth with a gestational age of less than 30 weeks. This risk increases even more when perforated NEC is added to the prematurity. With the use of peritoneal drainage, survival in this group can approach that of larger neonates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)137-139
Number of pages3
JournalPediatric Surgery International
Volume12
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Laparotomy
Newborn Infant
Infant Mortality
Local Anesthesia
Gestational Age
Drainage
Parturition
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • Necrotizing enterocolitis
  • Neonatal perforation
  • Peritoneal drain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Laparotomy or drain for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis : Who gets what and why? / Azarow, Kenneth; Ein, S. H.; Shandling, B.; Wesson, D.; Superina, R.; Filler, R. M.

In: Pediatric Surgery International, Vol. 12, No. 2-3, 02.1997, p. 137-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Azarow, Kenneth ; Ein, S. H. ; Shandling, B. ; Wesson, D. ; Superina, R. ; Filler, R. M. / Laparotomy or drain for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis : Who gets what and why?. In: Pediatric Surgery International. 1997 ; Vol. 12, No. 2-3. pp. 137-139.
@article{c0f444c11ed04079ac7ac20768374c34,
title = "Laparotomy or drain for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis: Who gets what and why?",
abstract = "Between 1974 and 1988, 86 newborns with perforated necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were treated by either laparotomy (usually involving a bowel resection and a temporary stoma) or a peritoneal drain under local anesthesia. The survival of babies in the laparotomy group was 57{\%} versus 59{\%} in the drained group. However, for neonates less than 1,000 g survival in the drained group was 69{\%} compared to 22{\%} for the laparotomy group (P <.01). As the weight of the babies increased over 1,000 g, the survival in the laparotomy group increased to 67{\%}. There was no significant increase in survival in infants over 1,500 g. The highest neonatal mortality risk is generally found among babies weighing less than 1,000 g at birth with a gestational age of less than 30 weeks. This risk increases even more when perforated NEC is added to the prematurity. With the use of peritoneal drainage, survival in this group can approach that of larger neonates.",
keywords = "Necrotizing enterocolitis, Neonatal perforation, Peritoneal drain",
author = "Kenneth Azarow and Ein, {S. H.} and B. Shandling and D. Wesson and R. Superina and Filler, {R. M.}",
year = "1997",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s003830050085",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "137--139",
journal = "Pediatric Surgery International",
issn = "0179-0358",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparotomy or drain for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis

T2 - Who gets what and why?

AU - Azarow, Kenneth

AU - Ein, S. H.

AU - Shandling, B.

AU - Wesson, D.

AU - Superina, R.

AU - Filler, R. M.

PY - 1997/2

Y1 - 1997/2

N2 - Between 1974 and 1988, 86 newborns with perforated necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were treated by either laparotomy (usually involving a bowel resection and a temporary stoma) or a peritoneal drain under local anesthesia. The survival of babies in the laparotomy group was 57% versus 59% in the drained group. However, for neonates less than 1,000 g survival in the drained group was 69% compared to 22% for the laparotomy group (P <.01). As the weight of the babies increased over 1,000 g, the survival in the laparotomy group increased to 67%. There was no significant increase in survival in infants over 1,500 g. The highest neonatal mortality risk is generally found among babies weighing less than 1,000 g at birth with a gestational age of less than 30 weeks. This risk increases even more when perforated NEC is added to the prematurity. With the use of peritoneal drainage, survival in this group can approach that of larger neonates.

AB - Between 1974 and 1988, 86 newborns with perforated necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were treated by either laparotomy (usually involving a bowel resection and a temporary stoma) or a peritoneal drain under local anesthesia. The survival of babies in the laparotomy group was 57% versus 59% in the drained group. However, for neonates less than 1,000 g survival in the drained group was 69% compared to 22% for the laparotomy group (P <.01). As the weight of the babies increased over 1,000 g, the survival in the laparotomy group increased to 67%. There was no significant increase in survival in infants over 1,500 g. The highest neonatal mortality risk is generally found among babies weighing less than 1,000 g at birth with a gestational age of less than 30 weeks. This risk increases even more when perforated NEC is added to the prematurity. With the use of peritoneal drainage, survival in this group can approach that of larger neonates.

KW - Necrotizing enterocolitis

KW - Neonatal perforation

KW - Peritoneal drain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030991782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030991782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s003830050085

DO - 10.1007/s003830050085

M3 - Article

C2 - 9156840

AN - SCOPUS:0030991782

VL - 12

SP - 137

EP - 139

JO - Pediatric Surgery International

JF - Pediatric Surgery International

SN - 0179-0358

IS - 2-3

ER -