Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is less expensive than open cholecystectomy

Richard E. Anderson, John Hunter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is emerging as the most attractive alternative to open cholecystectomy (OC) ever offered to patients. It combines a rapid recovery time with definitive therapy for their affliction. In addition to its greater acceptance by patients, LC has the potential to be more economical than OC because of the markedly shorter hospital stay required by most patients who have undergone LC. In this article we compare the hospital charges for patients undergoing LC with a matched group of patients undergoing OC. The hospital charge was $4,070 ± 297 (mean ± SEM) for patients undergoing LC and $5,017 ± 497 for patients undergoing OC. This difference arises from the mean cost of in–patient care, which was $353 ± 40 for LC patients and $1,335±138 for OC patients. LC appeared to be a bargain, both economically and physiologically.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)82-84
Number of pages3
JournalSurgical laparoscopy & endoscopy
Volume1
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Cholecystectomy
Hospital Charges
Inpatients
Length of Stay
Research Design
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Cost
  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Open cholecystectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is less expensive than open cholecystectomy. / Anderson, Richard E.; Hunter, John.

In: Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1991, p. 82-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9357acf0f9a04392b22dbb1ecb98f3eb,
title = "Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is less expensive than open cholecystectomy",
abstract = "Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is emerging as the most attractive alternative to open cholecystectomy (OC) ever offered to patients. It combines a rapid recovery time with definitive therapy for their affliction. In addition to its greater acceptance by patients, LC has the potential to be more economical than OC because of the markedly shorter hospital stay required by most patients who have undergone LC. In this article we compare the hospital charges for patients undergoing LC with a matched group of patients undergoing OC. The hospital charge was $4,070 ± 297 (mean ± SEM) for patients undergoing LC and $5,017 ± 497 for patients undergoing OC. This difference arises from the mean cost of in–patient care, which was $353 ± 40 for LC patients and $1,335±138 for OC patients. LC appeared to be a bargain, both economically and physiologically.",
keywords = "Cost, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Open cholecystectomy",
author = "Anderson, {Richard E.} and John Hunter",
year = "1991",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "82--84",
journal = "Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques",
issn = "1530-4515",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is less expensive than open cholecystectomy

AU - Anderson, Richard E.

AU - Hunter, John

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is emerging as the most attractive alternative to open cholecystectomy (OC) ever offered to patients. It combines a rapid recovery time with definitive therapy for their affliction. In addition to its greater acceptance by patients, LC has the potential to be more economical than OC because of the markedly shorter hospital stay required by most patients who have undergone LC. In this article we compare the hospital charges for patients undergoing LC with a matched group of patients undergoing OC. The hospital charge was $4,070 ± 297 (mean ± SEM) for patients undergoing LC and $5,017 ± 497 for patients undergoing OC. This difference arises from the mean cost of in–patient care, which was $353 ± 40 for LC patients and $1,335±138 for OC patients. LC appeared to be a bargain, both economically and physiologically.

AB - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is emerging as the most attractive alternative to open cholecystectomy (OC) ever offered to patients. It combines a rapid recovery time with definitive therapy for their affliction. In addition to its greater acceptance by patients, LC has the potential to be more economical than OC because of the markedly shorter hospital stay required by most patients who have undergone LC. In this article we compare the hospital charges for patients undergoing LC with a matched group of patients undergoing OC. The hospital charge was $4,070 ± 297 (mean ± SEM) for patients undergoing LC and $5,017 ± 497 for patients undergoing OC. This difference arises from the mean cost of in–patient care, which was $353 ± 40 for LC patients and $1,335±138 for OC patients. LC appeared to be a bargain, both economically and physiologically.

KW - Cost

KW - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

KW - Open cholecystectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026166812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026166812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 82

EP - 84

JO - Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

JF - Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

SN - 1530-4515

IS - 2

ER -