Judging who needs emergency department care

A prerequisite for policy- making

Robert (Bob) Lowe, Andrew B. Bindman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The debate regarding risks and benefits of triaging nonurgent patients away from emergency departments (EDs) stems from widely varying estimates as to what proportion of ED visits are inappropriate. A study was undertaken based on the hypothesis that these discrepant estimates might be due to differences in how 'appropriateness' is defined. This cross-sectional study included 596 ED patients. Seven different indicators of 'inappropriate' ED visits were used. Two could be determined by the patient; two were based on the triage nurse's assessment; three were determined retrospectively, by chart review. All 21 possible pairs of indicators were compared for agreement using the kappa statistic. The proportion of ED visits classified as inappropriate by the different indicators ranged from 10% to 90%. Kappa values for agreement between indicators ranged from -0.04 to 0.31, indicating poor agreement beyond that expected due to chance alone. Decisions as to which ED visits are appropriate depend heavily on the criteria used. Limiting patients' access to EDs without the aid of a valid and reliable standard for what constitutes an appropriate ED visit could create harmful barriers to care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)133-136
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Policy Making
Emergency Medical Services
Hospital Emergency Service
Triage
Cross-Sectional Studies
Nurses

Keywords

  • appropriateness
  • Emergency medicine
  • hospital emergency service (utilization)
  • triage (standards)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Judging who needs emergency department care : A prerequisite for policy- making. / Lowe, Robert (Bob); Bindman, Andrew B.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1997, p. 133-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2e47a683d3354c479fd25247bcfe798f,
title = "Judging who needs emergency department care: A prerequisite for policy- making",
abstract = "The debate regarding risks and benefits of triaging nonurgent patients away from emergency departments (EDs) stems from widely varying estimates as to what proportion of ED visits are inappropriate. A study was undertaken based on the hypothesis that these discrepant estimates might be due to differences in how 'appropriateness' is defined. This cross-sectional study included 596 ED patients. Seven different indicators of 'inappropriate' ED visits were used. Two could be determined by the patient; two were based on the triage nurse's assessment; three were determined retrospectively, by chart review. All 21 possible pairs of indicators were compared for agreement using the kappa statistic. The proportion of ED visits classified as inappropriate by the different indicators ranged from 10{\%} to 90{\%}. Kappa values for agreement between indicators ranged from -0.04 to 0.31, indicating poor agreement beyond that expected due to chance alone. Decisions as to which ED visits are appropriate depend heavily on the criteria used. Limiting patients' access to EDs without the aid of a valid and reliable standard for what constitutes an appropriate ED visit could create harmful barriers to care.",
keywords = "appropriateness, Emergency medicine, hospital emergency service (utilization), triage (standards)",
author = "Lowe, {Robert (Bob)} and Bindman, {Andrew B.}",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1016/S0735-6757(97)90083-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "133--136",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Judging who needs emergency department care

T2 - A prerequisite for policy- making

AU - Lowe, Robert (Bob)

AU - Bindman, Andrew B.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - The debate regarding risks and benefits of triaging nonurgent patients away from emergency departments (EDs) stems from widely varying estimates as to what proportion of ED visits are inappropriate. A study was undertaken based on the hypothesis that these discrepant estimates might be due to differences in how 'appropriateness' is defined. This cross-sectional study included 596 ED patients. Seven different indicators of 'inappropriate' ED visits were used. Two could be determined by the patient; two were based on the triage nurse's assessment; three were determined retrospectively, by chart review. All 21 possible pairs of indicators were compared for agreement using the kappa statistic. The proportion of ED visits classified as inappropriate by the different indicators ranged from 10% to 90%. Kappa values for agreement between indicators ranged from -0.04 to 0.31, indicating poor agreement beyond that expected due to chance alone. Decisions as to which ED visits are appropriate depend heavily on the criteria used. Limiting patients' access to EDs without the aid of a valid and reliable standard for what constitutes an appropriate ED visit could create harmful barriers to care.

AB - The debate regarding risks and benefits of triaging nonurgent patients away from emergency departments (EDs) stems from widely varying estimates as to what proportion of ED visits are inappropriate. A study was undertaken based on the hypothesis that these discrepant estimates might be due to differences in how 'appropriateness' is defined. This cross-sectional study included 596 ED patients. Seven different indicators of 'inappropriate' ED visits were used. Two could be determined by the patient; two were based on the triage nurse's assessment; three were determined retrospectively, by chart review. All 21 possible pairs of indicators were compared for agreement using the kappa statistic. The proportion of ED visits classified as inappropriate by the different indicators ranged from 10% to 90%. Kappa values for agreement between indicators ranged from -0.04 to 0.31, indicating poor agreement beyond that expected due to chance alone. Decisions as to which ED visits are appropriate depend heavily on the criteria used. Limiting patients' access to EDs without the aid of a valid and reliable standard for what constitutes an appropriate ED visit could create harmful barriers to care.

KW - appropriateness

KW - Emergency medicine

KW - hospital emergency service (utilization)

KW - triage (standards)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030960848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030960848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0735-6757(97)90083-8

DO - 10.1016/S0735-6757(97)90083-8

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 133

EP - 136

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 2

ER -