“It’s like riding out the chaos”: Caring for socially complex patients in an ambulatory intensive care unit (A-ICU)

Brian Chan, Elizabeth Hulen, Samuel Edwards, Matthew Mitchell, Christina Nicolaidis, Somnath Saha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE High-need high-cost (HNHC) patients consume a large proportion of health resources but often receive suboptimal care in traditional primary care. Intensive ambulatory care interventions attempt to better meet these patients’ needs, but we know little about how teams delivering these interventions in clinics serving socially complex patient populations perceive their work. METHODS We performed a qualitative study of multidisciplinary staff experiences at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) caring for predominantly homeless HNHC patients in the context of an ongoing implementation of an ambulatory intensive care unit (A-ICU) intervention. We conducted semistructured interviews with 9 ambulatory intensive care team members and 6 “usual care” members. We conducted a thematic analysis, using an inductive approach, at a semantic level. RESULTS Staff viewed complexity as a combination of social, behavioral, and medical challenges that lead to patient–health care system mismatch. Staff perceive the following as key ingredients in caring for HNHC patients: addressing both psychosocial and clinical needs together; persistence in staying connected to patients through chaotic periods; shared commitment and cohesion among interdisciplinary team members; and flexibility to tailor care to patients’ individual situations. Participants’ definitions of success focused more on improving patient engagement than reducing utilization or cost. CONCLUSION FQHC staff working with HNHC patients perceive mismatch between the health care system and patients’ clinical and social needs as the key driver of poor outcomes for these patients. Intensive ambulatory care teams may bridge mismatch through provision of psychosocial supports, flexible care delivery, and fostering team cohesion to support patient engagement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)495-501
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of family medicine
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2019

Fingerprint

Ambulatory Care
Intensive Care Units
Costs and Cost Analysis
Critical Care
Patient Participation
Foster Home Care
Health Resources
Health
Semantics
Primary Health Care
Patient Care
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Patient-centered care
  • Primary care
  • Primary care redesign
  • Underserved populations
  • Vulnerable populations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

“It’s like riding out the chaos” : Caring for socially complex patients in an ambulatory intensive care unit (A-ICU). / Chan, Brian; Hulen, Elizabeth; Edwards, Samuel; Mitchell, Matthew; Nicolaidis, Christina; Saha, Somnath.

In: Annals of family medicine, Vol. 17, No. 6, 01.11.2019, p. 495-501.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chan, Brian ; Hulen, Elizabeth ; Edwards, Samuel ; Mitchell, Matthew ; Nicolaidis, Christina ; Saha, Somnath. / “It’s like riding out the chaos” : Caring for socially complex patients in an ambulatory intensive care unit (A-ICU). In: Annals of family medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 17, No. 6. pp. 495-501.
@article{61622448e8e142f4a29a00eaf4e9f67d,
title = "“It’s like riding out the chaos”: Caring for socially complex patients in an ambulatory intensive care unit (A-ICU)",
abstract = "PURPOSE High-need high-cost (HNHC) patients consume a large proportion of health resources but often receive suboptimal care in traditional primary care. Intensive ambulatory care interventions attempt to better meet these patients’ needs, but we know little about how teams delivering these interventions in clinics serving socially complex patient populations perceive their work. METHODS We performed a qualitative study of multidisciplinary staff experiences at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) caring for predominantly homeless HNHC patients in the context of an ongoing implementation of an ambulatory intensive care unit (A-ICU) intervention. We conducted semistructured interviews with 9 ambulatory intensive care team members and 6 “usual care” members. We conducted a thematic analysis, using an inductive approach, at a semantic level. RESULTS Staff viewed complexity as a combination of social, behavioral, and medical challenges that lead to patient–health care system mismatch. Staff perceive the following as key ingredients in caring for HNHC patients: addressing both psychosocial and clinical needs together; persistence in staying connected to patients through chaotic periods; shared commitment and cohesion among interdisciplinary team members; and flexibility to tailor care to patients’ individual situations. Participants’ definitions of success focused more on improving patient engagement than reducing utilization or cost. CONCLUSION FQHC staff working with HNHC patients perceive mismatch between the health care system and patients’ clinical and social needs as the key driver of poor outcomes for these patients. Intensive ambulatory care teams may bridge mismatch through provision of psychosocial supports, flexible care delivery, and fostering team cohesion to support patient engagement.",
keywords = "Patient-centered care, Primary care, Primary care redesign, Underserved populations, Vulnerable populations",
author = "Brian Chan and Elizabeth Hulen and Samuel Edwards and Matthew Mitchell and Christina Nicolaidis and Somnath Saha",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1370/afm.2464",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "495--501",
journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",
issn = "1544-1709",
publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “It’s like riding out the chaos”

T2 - Caring for socially complex patients in an ambulatory intensive care unit (A-ICU)

AU - Chan, Brian

AU - Hulen, Elizabeth

AU - Edwards, Samuel

AU - Mitchell, Matthew

AU - Nicolaidis, Christina

AU - Saha, Somnath

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - PURPOSE High-need high-cost (HNHC) patients consume a large proportion of health resources but often receive suboptimal care in traditional primary care. Intensive ambulatory care interventions attempt to better meet these patients’ needs, but we know little about how teams delivering these interventions in clinics serving socially complex patient populations perceive their work. METHODS We performed a qualitative study of multidisciplinary staff experiences at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) caring for predominantly homeless HNHC patients in the context of an ongoing implementation of an ambulatory intensive care unit (A-ICU) intervention. We conducted semistructured interviews with 9 ambulatory intensive care team members and 6 “usual care” members. We conducted a thematic analysis, using an inductive approach, at a semantic level. RESULTS Staff viewed complexity as a combination of social, behavioral, and medical challenges that lead to patient–health care system mismatch. Staff perceive the following as key ingredients in caring for HNHC patients: addressing both psychosocial and clinical needs together; persistence in staying connected to patients through chaotic periods; shared commitment and cohesion among interdisciplinary team members; and flexibility to tailor care to patients’ individual situations. Participants’ definitions of success focused more on improving patient engagement than reducing utilization or cost. CONCLUSION FQHC staff working with HNHC patients perceive mismatch between the health care system and patients’ clinical and social needs as the key driver of poor outcomes for these patients. Intensive ambulatory care teams may bridge mismatch through provision of psychosocial supports, flexible care delivery, and fostering team cohesion to support patient engagement.

AB - PURPOSE High-need high-cost (HNHC) patients consume a large proportion of health resources but often receive suboptimal care in traditional primary care. Intensive ambulatory care interventions attempt to better meet these patients’ needs, but we know little about how teams delivering these interventions in clinics serving socially complex patient populations perceive their work. METHODS We performed a qualitative study of multidisciplinary staff experiences at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) caring for predominantly homeless HNHC patients in the context of an ongoing implementation of an ambulatory intensive care unit (A-ICU) intervention. We conducted semistructured interviews with 9 ambulatory intensive care team members and 6 “usual care” members. We conducted a thematic analysis, using an inductive approach, at a semantic level. RESULTS Staff viewed complexity as a combination of social, behavioral, and medical challenges that lead to patient–health care system mismatch. Staff perceive the following as key ingredients in caring for HNHC patients: addressing both psychosocial and clinical needs together; persistence in staying connected to patients through chaotic periods; shared commitment and cohesion among interdisciplinary team members; and flexibility to tailor care to patients’ individual situations. Participants’ definitions of success focused more on improving patient engagement than reducing utilization or cost. CONCLUSION FQHC staff working with HNHC patients perceive mismatch between the health care system and patients’ clinical and social needs as the key driver of poor outcomes for these patients. Intensive ambulatory care teams may bridge mismatch through provision of psychosocial supports, flexible care delivery, and fostering team cohesion to support patient engagement.

KW - Patient-centered care

KW - Primary care

KW - Primary care redesign

KW - Underserved populations

KW - Vulnerable populations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074855189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074855189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1370/afm.2464

DO - 10.1370/afm.2464

M3 - Article

C2 - 31712287

AN - SCOPUS:85074855189

VL - 17

SP - 495

EP - 501

JO - Annals of Family Medicine

JF - Annals of Family Medicine

SN - 1544-1709

IS - 6

ER -