Issues of concern to emergency physicians in pre-retirement years

A survey

Richard Goldberg, Harold (Hal) Thomas, Louis Penner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Many members of the American College of Emergency Physicians are now over the age of 50. Little is known regarding age-specific issues that may impact the careers of emergency physicians in the latter stages of their professional lives. Objectives: To determine issues of concern regarding aging and retirement among a cohort of emergency physicians in pre-retirement years. Methods: A survey of a randomized sample of 1000 American College of Emergency Physicians members over the age of 55 years was conducted with two separate mailings in the fall of 2006 and winter of 2007. The survey instrument consisted of 30 questions relating primarily to issues of health, finances, and the ability to practice emergency medicine. Four open-ended questions were included at the end of the survey, relating to means of promoting career longevity. Results: There were 802 usable responses received (response rate 80%). The average respondent was 57 years old and worked 30 clinical and 12 non-clinical h per week. The average estimated time to complete retirement was 7.8 years. Respondents generally viewed themselves as competent clinicians with improved ability to relate to patients and staff and little decline in procedural skills. However, a substantial proportion reported age-related concerns. Seventy-four percent reported less ability to recover from night shifts, 44% reported a higher level of emotional exhaustion at end of shift, 40% reported less ability to manage heavy patient volume, 36% reported less ability to handle stress of emergency medicine, 28% reported health limitations on ability to practice, 28% reported memory somewhat or considerably worse, and 25% reported less ability to incorporate new modalities of diagnosis and treatment. With regard to retirement-related issues, 42% reported concerns about adequate financial preparations and 44% reported concerns regarding loss of identity upon retirement. The practice modifications most commonly reported to impact career longevity were the reduction or elimination of night shifts, a reduction in the number of hours per shift, and an increase in physician and support staffing. Conclusions: Respondents to this survey generally viewed themselves as competent, empathic practitioners. Yet a substantial percentage acknowledged at least some degree of cognitive or physical decline. The results suggest a role for the national organizations in emergency medicine in endorsing practice modifications that promote career longevity and clinical competence among its senior members.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)706-713
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Retirement
Emergencies
Physicians
Emergency Medicine
Clinical Competence
Health
Surveys and Questionnaires
Practice (Psychology)

Keywords

  • aging physician
  • career longevity
  • clinical competence
  • cognitive decline
  • physician impairment
  • physician retirement
  • physician wellness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Issues of concern to emergency physicians in pre-retirement years : A survey. / Goldberg, Richard; Thomas, Harold (Hal); Penner, Louis.

In: Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 40, No. 6, 06.2011, p. 706-713.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goldberg, Richard ; Thomas, Harold (Hal) ; Penner, Louis. / Issues of concern to emergency physicians in pre-retirement years : A survey. In: Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 40, No. 6. pp. 706-713.
@article{54e3816d79854f558db5b7846552b662,
title = "Issues of concern to emergency physicians in pre-retirement years: A survey",
abstract = "Background: Many members of the American College of Emergency Physicians are now over the age of 50. Little is known regarding age-specific issues that may impact the careers of emergency physicians in the latter stages of their professional lives. Objectives: To determine issues of concern regarding aging and retirement among a cohort of emergency physicians in pre-retirement years. Methods: A survey of a randomized sample of 1000 American College of Emergency Physicians members over the age of 55 years was conducted with two separate mailings in the fall of 2006 and winter of 2007. The survey instrument consisted of 30 questions relating primarily to issues of health, finances, and the ability to practice emergency medicine. Four open-ended questions were included at the end of the survey, relating to means of promoting career longevity. Results: There were 802 usable responses received (response rate 80{\%}). The average respondent was 57 years old and worked 30 clinical and 12 non-clinical h per week. The average estimated time to complete retirement was 7.8 years. Respondents generally viewed themselves as competent clinicians with improved ability to relate to patients and staff and little decline in procedural skills. However, a substantial proportion reported age-related concerns. Seventy-four percent reported less ability to recover from night shifts, 44{\%} reported a higher level of emotional exhaustion at end of shift, 40{\%} reported less ability to manage heavy patient volume, 36{\%} reported less ability to handle stress of emergency medicine, 28{\%} reported health limitations on ability to practice, 28{\%} reported memory somewhat or considerably worse, and 25{\%} reported less ability to incorporate new modalities of diagnosis and treatment. With regard to retirement-related issues, 42{\%} reported concerns about adequate financial preparations and 44{\%} reported concerns regarding loss of identity upon retirement. The practice modifications most commonly reported to impact career longevity were the reduction or elimination of night shifts, a reduction in the number of hours per shift, and an increase in physician and support staffing. Conclusions: Respondents to this survey generally viewed themselves as competent, empathic practitioners. Yet a substantial percentage acknowledged at least some degree of cognitive or physical decline. The results suggest a role for the national organizations in emergency medicine in endorsing practice modifications that promote career longevity and clinical competence among its senior members.",
keywords = "aging physician, career longevity, clinical competence, cognitive decline, physician impairment, physician retirement, physician wellness",
author = "Richard Goldberg and Thomas, {Harold (Hal)} and Louis Penner",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.08.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "706--713",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0736-4679",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Issues of concern to emergency physicians in pre-retirement years

T2 - A survey

AU - Goldberg, Richard

AU - Thomas, Harold (Hal)

AU - Penner, Louis

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Background: Many members of the American College of Emergency Physicians are now over the age of 50. Little is known regarding age-specific issues that may impact the careers of emergency physicians in the latter stages of their professional lives. Objectives: To determine issues of concern regarding aging and retirement among a cohort of emergency physicians in pre-retirement years. Methods: A survey of a randomized sample of 1000 American College of Emergency Physicians members over the age of 55 years was conducted with two separate mailings in the fall of 2006 and winter of 2007. The survey instrument consisted of 30 questions relating primarily to issues of health, finances, and the ability to practice emergency medicine. Four open-ended questions were included at the end of the survey, relating to means of promoting career longevity. Results: There were 802 usable responses received (response rate 80%). The average respondent was 57 years old and worked 30 clinical and 12 non-clinical h per week. The average estimated time to complete retirement was 7.8 years. Respondents generally viewed themselves as competent clinicians with improved ability to relate to patients and staff and little decline in procedural skills. However, a substantial proportion reported age-related concerns. Seventy-four percent reported less ability to recover from night shifts, 44% reported a higher level of emotional exhaustion at end of shift, 40% reported less ability to manage heavy patient volume, 36% reported less ability to handle stress of emergency medicine, 28% reported health limitations on ability to practice, 28% reported memory somewhat or considerably worse, and 25% reported less ability to incorporate new modalities of diagnosis and treatment. With regard to retirement-related issues, 42% reported concerns about adequate financial preparations and 44% reported concerns regarding loss of identity upon retirement. The practice modifications most commonly reported to impact career longevity were the reduction or elimination of night shifts, a reduction in the number of hours per shift, and an increase in physician and support staffing. Conclusions: Respondents to this survey generally viewed themselves as competent, empathic practitioners. Yet a substantial percentage acknowledged at least some degree of cognitive or physical decline. The results suggest a role for the national organizations in emergency medicine in endorsing practice modifications that promote career longevity and clinical competence among its senior members.

AB - Background: Many members of the American College of Emergency Physicians are now over the age of 50. Little is known regarding age-specific issues that may impact the careers of emergency physicians in the latter stages of their professional lives. Objectives: To determine issues of concern regarding aging and retirement among a cohort of emergency physicians in pre-retirement years. Methods: A survey of a randomized sample of 1000 American College of Emergency Physicians members over the age of 55 years was conducted with two separate mailings in the fall of 2006 and winter of 2007. The survey instrument consisted of 30 questions relating primarily to issues of health, finances, and the ability to practice emergency medicine. Four open-ended questions were included at the end of the survey, relating to means of promoting career longevity. Results: There were 802 usable responses received (response rate 80%). The average respondent was 57 years old and worked 30 clinical and 12 non-clinical h per week. The average estimated time to complete retirement was 7.8 years. Respondents generally viewed themselves as competent clinicians with improved ability to relate to patients and staff and little decline in procedural skills. However, a substantial proportion reported age-related concerns. Seventy-four percent reported less ability to recover from night shifts, 44% reported a higher level of emotional exhaustion at end of shift, 40% reported less ability to manage heavy patient volume, 36% reported less ability to handle stress of emergency medicine, 28% reported health limitations on ability to practice, 28% reported memory somewhat or considerably worse, and 25% reported less ability to incorporate new modalities of diagnosis and treatment. With regard to retirement-related issues, 42% reported concerns about adequate financial preparations and 44% reported concerns regarding loss of identity upon retirement. The practice modifications most commonly reported to impact career longevity were the reduction or elimination of night shifts, a reduction in the number of hours per shift, and an increase in physician and support staffing. Conclusions: Respondents to this survey generally viewed themselves as competent, empathic practitioners. Yet a substantial percentage acknowledged at least some degree of cognitive or physical decline. The results suggest a role for the national organizations in emergency medicine in endorsing practice modifications that promote career longevity and clinical competence among its senior members.

KW - aging physician

KW - career longevity

KW - clinical competence

KW - cognitive decline

KW - physician impairment

KW - physician retirement

KW - physician wellness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958768861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958768861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.08.020

DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.08.020

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 706

EP - 713

JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0736-4679

IS - 6

ER -