Is splanchnic perfusion pressure more predictive of outcome than intragastric pressure in neonates with gastroschisis?

Rebecca M. McGuigan, Kenneth Azarow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The purpose of this study is to determine whether calculated splanchnic perfusion pressure (SPP) is more predictive of outcome than measured intragastric pressure (IGP) in patients with gastroschisis. Methods Retrospective chart review from 1997 through 2003 of 12 patients with gastroschisis. Results Eight total patients with gastroschisis underwent reduction and had adequate data for analysis. One patient underwent reduction on day of life (DOL) 6; the remainder underwent reduction on DOL 1. All patients had postreduction IGP

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)609-611
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume187
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gastroschisis
Viscera
Perfusion
Newborn Infant
Pressure

Keywords

  • Abdominal pressure
  • Abdominal wall defect
  • Gastric pressure
  • Gastroschisis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Is splanchnic perfusion pressure more predictive of outcome than intragastric pressure in neonates with gastroschisis? / McGuigan, Rebecca M.; Azarow, Kenneth.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 187, No. 5, 05.2004, p. 609-611.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{84f982b8cef04d5e8a03c7888e802c20,
title = "Is splanchnic perfusion pressure more predictive of outcome than intragastric pressure in neonates with gastroschisis?",
abstract = "Background The purpose of this study is to determine whether calculated splanchnic perfusion pressure (SPP) is more predictive of outcome than measured intragastric pressure (IGP) in patients with gastroschisis. Methods Retrospective chart review from 1997 through 2003 of 12 patients with gastroschisis. Results Eight total patients with gastroschisis underwent reduction and had adequate data for analysis. One patient underwent reduction on day of life (DOL) 6; the remainder underwent reduction on DOL 1. All patients had postreduction IGP",
keywords = "Abdominal pressure, Abdominal wall defect, Gastric pressure, Gastroschisis",
author = "McGuigan, {Rebecca M.} and Kenneth Azarow",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.01.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "187",
pages = "609--611",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is splanchnic perfusion pressure more predictive of outcome than intragastric pressure in neonates with gastroschisis?

AU - McGuigan, Rebecca M.

AU - Azarow, Kenneth

PY - 2004/5

Y1 - 2004/5

N2 - Background The purpose of this study is to determine whether calculated splanchnic perfusion pressure (SPP) is more predictive of outcome than measured intragastric pressure (IGP) in patients with gastroschisis. Methods Retrospective chart review from 1997 through 2003 of 12 patients with gastroschisis. Results Eight total patients with gastroschisis underwent reduction and had adequate data for analysis. One patient underwent reduction on day of life (DOL) 6; the remainder underwent reduction on DOL 1. All patients had postreduction IGP

AB - Background The purpose of this study is to determine whether calculated splanchnic perfusion pressure (SPP) is more predictive of outcome than measured intragastric pressure (IGP) in patients with gastroschisis. Methods Retrospective chart review from 1997 through 2003 of 12 patients with gastroschisis. Results Eight total patients with gastroschisis underwent reduction and had adequate data for analysis. One patient underwent reduction on day of life (DOL) 6; the remainder underwent reduction on DOL 1. All patients had postreduction IGP

KW - Abdominal pressure

KW - Abdominal wall defect

KW - Gastric pressure

KW - Gastroschisis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2342655075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2342655075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.01.008

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.01.008

M3 - Article

VL - 187

SP - 609

EP - 611

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 5

ER -