Is futile care in the injured elderly an important target for cost savings?

Ross J. Fleischman, Richard Mullins, Kenneth (John) McConnell, Jerris R. Hedges, Oscar Ma, Craig Newgard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study proposes a definition of futile care and quantifies its cost in injured elders. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of Medicare patients with an International Classification of Diseases-9 injury diagnosis admitted to 171 Oregon and Washington facilities from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2002, who died within 6 months of admission. Futile care was defined as death within 7 days of discharge from a hospitalization of at least 14 days. We compared health care costs in the last 6 months of life with those who did and did not meet our definition of futility. To simulate predicting and preventing futility early in the hospital course, we examined the effect of reducing spending on the futile care cohort to the level of those who survived 7 to 10 days after injury. RESULTS: There were 6,832 elders who died within 6 months of injury, of whom 230 (3.4%) met our definition of futility. The median cost of care in the last 6 months of life was $33,373 for those not meeting our definition of futility and $87,391 for the futile care group (p <0.001). The 3.4% receiving futile care incurred 8.9% of total costs. Reducing expenditures in the futile care group to the level of those who died from 7 to 10 days after injury (median, $25,633) would result in an overall cost savings of 6.5%. CONCLUSION: End-of-life health care costs were significantly higher for those who received futile care. However, even aggressive reductions in futile care would result in small savings overall. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic analysis, level III.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)146-151
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume73
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

Medical Futility
Cost Savings
Wounds and Injuries
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health Care Costs
Terminal Care
International Classification of Diseases
Health Expenditures
Medicare
Hospitalization
Retrospective Studies
Economics

Keywords

  • Geriatrics; injury; trauma; economics; futility.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Is futile care in the injured elderly an important target for cost savings? / Fleischman, Ross J.; Mullins, Richard; McConnell, Kenneth (John); Hedges, Jerris R.; Ma, Oscar; Newgard, Craig.

In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Vol. 73, No. 1, 07.2012, p. 146-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ba482b3995c241feb6c59ebfa06a5a4d,
title = "Is futile care in the injured elderly an important target for cost savings?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: This study proposes a definition of futile care and quantifies its cost in injured elders. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of Medicare patients with an International Classification of Diseases-9 injury diagnosis admitted to 171 Oregon and Washington facilities from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2002, who died within 6 months of admission. Futile care was defined as death within 7 days of discharge from a hospitalization of at least 14 days. We compared health care costs in the last 6 months of life with those who did and did not meet our definition of futility. To simulate predicting and preventing futility early in the hospital course, we examined the effect of reducing spending on the futile care cohort to the level of those who survived 7 to 10 days after injury. RESULTS: There were 6,832 elders who died within 6 months of injury, of whom 230 (3.4{\%}) met our definition of futility. The median cost of care in the last 6 months of life was $33,373 for those not meeting our definition of futility and $87,391 for the futile care group (p <0.001). The 3.4{\%} receiving futile care incurred 8.9{\%} of total costs. Reducing expenditures in the futile care group to the level of those who died from 7 to 10 days after injury (median, $25,633) would result in an overall cost savings of 6.5{\%}. CONCLUSION: End-of-life health care costs were significantly higher for those who received futile care. However, even aggressive reductions in futile care would result in small savings overall. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic analysis, level III.",
keywords = "Geriatrics; injury; trauma; economics; futility.",
author = "Fleischman, {Ross J.} and Richard Mullins and McConnell, {Kenneth (John)} and Hedges, {Jerris R.} and Oscar Ma and Craig Newgard",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e318251f9aa",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "146--151",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is futile care in the injured elderly an important target for cost savings?

AU - Fleischman, Ross J.

AU - Mullins, Richard

AU - McConnell, Kenneth (John)

AU - Hedges, Jerris R.

AU - Ma, Oscar

AU - Newgard, Craig

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - BACKGROUND: This study proposes a definition of futile care and quantifies its cost in injured elders. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of Medicare patients with an International Classification of Diseases-9 injury diagnosis admitted to 171 Oregon and Washington facilities from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2002, who died within 6 months of admission. Futile care was defined as death within 7 days of discharge from a hospitalization of at least 14 days. We compared health care costs in the last 6 months of life with those who did and did not meet our definition of futility. To simulate predicting and preventing futility early in the hospital course, we examined the effect of reducing spending on the futile care cohort to the level of those who survived 7 to 10 days after injury. RESULTS: There were 6,832 elders who died within 6 months of injury, of whom 230 (3.4%) met our definition of futility. The median cost of care in the last 6 months of life was $33,373 for those not meeting our definition of futility and $87,391 for the futile care group (p <0.001). The 3.4% receiving futile care incurred 8.9% of total costs. Reducing expenditures in the futile care group to the level of those who died from 7 to 10 days after injury (median, $25,633) would result in an overall cost savings of 6.5%. CONCLUSION: End-of-life health care costs were significantly higher for those who received futile care. However, even aggressive reductions in futile care would result in small savings overall. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic analysis, level III.

AB - BACKGROUND: This study proposes a definition of futile care and quantifies its cost in injured elders. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of Medicare patients with an International Classification of Diseases-9 injury diagnosis admitted to 171 Oregon and Washington facilities from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2002, who died within 6 months of admission. Futile care was defined as death within 7 days of discharge from a hospitalization of at least 14 days. We compared health care costs in the last 6 months of life with those who did and did not meet our definition of futility. To simulate predicting and preventing futility early in the hospital course, we examined the effect of reducing spending on the futile care cohort to the level of those who survived 7 to 10 days after injury. RESULTS: There were 6,832 elders who died within 6 months of injury, of whom 230 (3.4%) met our definition of futility. The median cost of care in the last 6 months of life was $33,373 for those not meeting our definition of futility and $87,391 for the futile care group (p <0.001). The 3.4% receiving futile care incurred 8.9% of total costs. Reducing expenditures in the futile care group to the level of those who died from 7 to 10 days after injury (median, $25,633) would result in an overall cost savings of 6.5%. CONCLUSION: End-of-life health care costs were significantly higher for those who received futile care. However, even aggressive reductions in futile care would result in small savings overall. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic analysis, level III.

KW - Geriatrics; injury; trauma; economics; futility.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864254295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864254295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e318251f9aa

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e318251f9aa

M3 - Article

C2 - 22743384

AN - SCOPUS:84864254295

VL - 73

SP - 146

EP - 151

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 1

ER -