Is ADHD a disinhibitory disorder?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

578 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is widely theorized to stem from dysfunctional inhibitory processes. However, the definition of inhibition is imprecisely distinguished across theories. To clarify the evidence for this conception, the author relies on a heuristic distinction between inhibition that is under executive control and inhibition that is under motivational control (anxiety or fear). It is argued that ADHD is unlikely to be due to a motivational inhibitory control deficit, although suggestions are made for additional studies that could overturn that conclusion. Evidence for a deficit in an executive motor inhibition process for the ADHD combined type is more compelling but is not equally strong for all forms of executive inhibitory control. Remaining issues include specificity to ADHD, whether inhibitory problems are primary or secondary in causing ADHD, role of comorbid anxiety and conduct disorder, and functional deficits in the inattentive ADHD subtype.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)571-598
Number of pages28
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume127
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
Executive Function
Conduct Disorder
Anxiety Disorders
Fear
Anxiety
Inhibition (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Is ADHD a disinhibitory disorder? / Nigg, Joel.

In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 127, No. 5, 01.01.2001, p. 571-598.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nigg, Joel. / Is ADHD a disinhibitory disorder?. In: Psychological Bulletin. 2001 ; Vol. 127, No. 5. pp. 571-598.
@article{c9043871e1e143d2bf29f50cdc52f2c9,
title = "Is ADHD a disinhibitory disorder?",
abstract = "Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is widely theorized to stem from dysfunctional inhibitory processes. However, the definition of inhibition is imprecisely distinguished across theories. To clarify the evidence for this conception, the author relies on a heuristic distinction between inhibition that is under executive control and inhibition that is under motivational control (anxiety or fear). It is argued that ADHD is unlikely to be due to a motivational inhibitory control deficit, although suggestions are made for additional studies that could overturn that conclusion. Evidence for a deficit in an executive motor inhibition process for the ADHD combined type is more compelling but is not equally strong for all forms of executive inhibitory control. Remaining issues include specificity to ADHD, whether inhibitory problems are primary or secondary in causing ADHD, role of comorbid anxiety and conduct disorder, and functional deficits in the inattentive ADHD subtype.",
author = "Joel Nigg",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0033-2909.127.5.571",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "127",
pages = "571--598",
journal = "Psychological Bulletin",
issn = "0033-2909",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is ADHD a disinhibitory disorder?

AU - Nigg, Joel

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is widely theorized to stem from dysfunctional inhibitory processes. However, the definition of inhibition is imprecisely distinguished across theories. To clarify the evidence for this conception, the author relies on a heuristic distinction between inhibition that is under executive control and inhibition that is under motivational control (anxiety or fear). It is argued that ADHD is unlikely to be due to a motivational inhibitory control deficit, although suggestions are made for additional studies that could overturn that conclusion. Evidence for a deficit in an executive motor inhibition process for the ADHD combined type is more compelling but is not equally strong for all forms of executive inhibitory control. Remaining issues include specificity to ADHD, whether inhibitory problems are primary or secondary in causing ADHD, role of comorbid anxiety and conduct disorder, and functional deficits in the inattentive ADHD subtype.

AB - Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is widely theorized to stem from dysfunctional inhibitory processes. However, the definition of inhibition is imprecisely distinguished across theories. To clarify the evidence for this conception, the author relies on a heuristic distinction between inhibition that is under executive control and inhibition that is under motivational control (anxiety or fear). It is argued that ADHD is unlikely to be due to a motivational inhibitory control deficit, although suggestions are made for additional studies that could overturn that conclusion. Evidence for a deficit in an executive motor inhibition process for the ADHD combined type is more compelling but is not equally strong for all forms of executive inhibitory control. Remaining issues include specificity to ADHD, whether inhibitory problems are primary or secondary in causing ADHD, role of comorbid anxiety and conduct disorder, and functional deficits in the inattentive ADHD subtype.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047686537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047686537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0033-2909.127.5.571

DO - 10.1037/0033-2909.127.5.571

M3 - Article

C2 - 11548968

AN - SCOPUS:85047686537

VL - 127

SP - 571

EP - 598

JO - Psychological Bulletin

JF - Psychological Bulletin

SN - 0033-2909

IS - 5

ER -