Involving patients in clinical decisions: Impact of an interactive video program on use of back surgery

Richard (Rick) Deyo, Daniel C. Cherkin, James Weinstein, John Howe, Marcia Ciol, Albert G. Mulley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

144 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Back surgery rates are rapidly rising in the United States. This surgery is usually elective, so patient preferences are important in the treatment decision. OBJECTIVES. The objective of this study was to determine the impact on outcomes and surgical choices of an interactive, diagnosis-specific videodisk program for informing patients about treatment choices. RESEARCH DESIGN. This was a randomized, controlled trial at 2 sites comparing the interactive video plus a booklet with the booklet alone. SUBJECTS. Elective surgery candidates (n = 393) included 171 patients with herniated disks, 110 with spinal stenosis, and 112 with other diagnoses. MEASURES. Mailed questionnaires were used to assess outcomes and satisfaction; surgery rates were determined by questionnaires and automated records. RESULTS. Symptom and functional outcomes at 3 months and 1 year were similar between study groups. The overall surgery rate was 22% lower in the videodisk group (26% versus 33%, P = 0.08). Among patients with herniated disks, those in the video group underwent significantly less surgery (32% versus 47%, P = 0.05 by Kaplan-Meier test). Among patients with spinal stenosis, surgery rates in the video group were higher (39% for the video group, 29% for the booklet group; P = 0.4). There was little effect on patient satisfaction, but patients in the video group felt better informed. CONCLUSIONS. The program appears to facilitate decision making and may help to ensure informed consent. For patients with herniated disks, it reduced the surgery rate without diminishing patient outcomes. Its impact on costs of care depends on the proportion of patients with various diagnoses and on local surgery rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)959-969
Number of pages11
JournalMedical Care
Volume38
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

surgery
video
Intervertebral Disc Displacement
Pamphlets
videodisc
Spinal Stenosis
Group
Patient Preference
questionnaire
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
study group
Informed Consent
Patient Satisfaction
Decision Making
Randomized Controlled Trials
candidacy
decision making
Costs and Cost Analysis
Therapeutics
costs

Keywords

  • Herniated disk
  • Lumbar spine surgery
  • Patient education
  • Shared decision making
  • Spinal stenosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Deyo, R. R., Cherkin, D. C., Weinstein, J., Howe, J., Ciol, M., & Mulley, A. G. (2000). Involving patients in clinical decisions: Impact of an interactive video program on use of back surgery. Medical Care, 38(9), 959-969.

Involving patients in clinical decisions : Impact of an interactive video program on use of back surgery. / Deyo, Richard (Rick); Cherkin, Daniel C.; Weinstein, James; Howe, John; Ciol, Marcia; Mulley, Albert G.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 38, No. 9, 09.2000, p. 959-969.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deyo, RR, Cherkin, DC, Weinstein, J, Howe, J, Ciol, M & Mulley, AG 2000, 'Involving patients in clinical decisions: Impact of an interactive video program on use of back surgery', Medical Care, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 959-969.
Deyo, Richard (Rick) ; Cherkin, Daniel C. ; Weinstein, James ; Howe, John ; Ciol, Marcia ; Mulley, Albert G. / Involving patients in clinical decisions : Impact of an interactive video program on use of back surgery. In: Medical Care. 2000 ; Vol. 38, No. 9. pp. 959-969.
@article{dc04ebe7682c4558b3e3490fd0a1799b,
title = "Involving patients in clinical decisions: Impact of an interactive video program on use of back surgery",
abstract = "BACKGROUND. Back surgery rates are rapidly rising in the United States. This surgery is usually elective, so patient preferences are important in the treatment decision. OBJECTIVES. The objective of this study was to determine the impact on outcomes and surgical choices of an interactive, diagnosis-specific videodisk program for informing patients about treatment choices. RESEARCH DESIGN. This was a randomized, controlled trial at 2 sites comparing the interactive video plus a booklet with the booklet alone. SUBJECTS. Elective surgery candidates (n = 393) included 171 patients with herniated disks, 110 with spinal stenosis, and 112 with other diagnoses. MEASURES. Mailed questionnaires were used to assess outcomes and satisfaction; surgery rates were determined by questionnaires and automated records. RESULTS. Symptom and functional outcomes at 3 months and 1 year were similar between study groups. The overall surgery rate was 22{\%} lower in the videodisk group (26{\%} versus 33{\%}, P = 0.08). Among patients with herniated disks, those in the video group underwent significantly less surgery (32{\%} versus 47{\%}, P = 0.05 by Kaplan-Meier test). Among patients with spinal stenosis, surgery rates in the video group were higher (39{\%} for the video group, 29{\%} for the booklet group; P = 0.4). There was little effect on patient satisfaction, but patients in the video group felt better informed. CONCLUSIONS. The program appears to facilitate decision making and may help to ensure informed consent. For patients with herniated disks, it reduced the surgery rate without diminishing patient outcomes. Its impact on costs of care depends on the proportion of patients with various diagnoses and on local surgery rates.",
keywords = "Herniated disk, Lumbar spine surgery, Patient education, Shared decision making, Spinal stenosis",
author = "Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Cherkin, {Daniel C.} and James Weinstein and John Howe and Marcia Ciol and Mulley, {Albert G.}",
year = "2000",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "959--969",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Involving patients in clinical decisions

T2 - Impact of an interactive video program on use of back surgery

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Cherkin, Daniel C.

AU - Weinstein, James

AU - Howe, John

AU - Ciol, Marcia

AU - Mulley, Albert G.

PY - 2000/9

Y1 - 2000/9

N2 - BACKGROUND. Back surgery rates are rapidly rising in the United States. This surgery is usually elective, so patient preferences are important in the treatment decision. OBJECTIVES. The objective of this study was to determine the impact on outcomes and surgical choices of an interactive, diagnosis-specific videodisk program for informing patients about treatment choices. RESEARCH DESIGN. This was a randomized, controlled trial at 2 sites comparing the interactive video plus a booklet with the booklet alone. SUBJECTS. Elective surgery candidates (n = 393) included 171 patients with herniated disks, 110 with spinal stenosis, and 112 with other diagnoses. MEASURES. Mailed questionnaires were used to assess outcomes and satisfaction; surgery rates were determined by questionnaires and automated records. RESULTS. Symptom and functional outcomes at 3 months and 1 year were similar between study groups. The overall surgery rate was 22% lower in the videodisk group (26% versus 33%, P = 0.08). Among patients with herniated disks, those in the video group underwent significantly less surgery (32% versus 47%, P = 0.05 by Kaplan-Meier test). Among patients with spinal stenosis, surgery rates in the video group were higher (39% for the video group, 29% for the booklet group; P = 0.4). There was little effect on patient satisfaction, but patients in the video group felt better informed. CONCLUSIONS. The program appears to facilitate decision making and may help to ensure informed consent. For patients with herniated disks, it reduced the surgery rate without diminishing patient outcomes. Its impact on costs of care depends on the proportion of patients with various diagnoses and on local surgery rates.

AB - BACKGROUND. Back surgery rates are rapidly rising in the United States. This surgery is usually elective, so patient preferences are important in the treatment decision. OBJECTIVES. The objective of this study was to determine the impact on outcomes and surgical choices of an interactive, diagnosis-specific videodisk program for informing patients about treatment choices. RESEARCH DESIGN. This was a randomized, controlled trial at 2 sites comparing the interactive video plus a booklet with the booklet alone. SUBJECTS. Elective surgery candidates (n = 393) included 171 patients with herniated disks, 110 with spinal stenosis, and 112 with other diagnoses. MEASURES. Mailed questionnaires were used to assess outcomes and satisfaction; surgery rates were determined by questionnaires and automated records. RESULTS. Symptom and functional outcomes at 3 months and 1 year were similar between study groups. The overall surgery rate was 22% lower in the videodisk group (26% versus 33%, P = 0.08). Among patients with herniated disks, those in the video group underwent significantly less surgery (32% versus 47%, P = 0.05 by Kaplan-Meier test). Among patients with spinal stenosis, surgery rates in the video group were higher (39% for the video group, 29% for the booklet group; P = 0.4). There was little effect on patient satisfaction, but patients in the video group felt better informed. CONCLUSIONS. The program appears to facilitate decision making and may help to ensure informed consent. For patients with herniated disks, it reduced the surgery rate without diminishing patient outcomes. Its impact on costs of care depends on the proportion of patients with various diagnoses and on local surgery rates.

KW - Herniated disk

KW - Lumbar spine surgery

KW - Patient education

KW - Shared decision making

KW - Spinal stenosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034264312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034264312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10982117

AN - SCOPUS:0034264312

VL - 38

SP - 959

EP - 969

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 9

ER -