Investigators' successful strategies for working with institutional review boards

Juliana Cartwright, Susan E. Hickman, Christine A. Nelson, Kathleen A. Knafl

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study was designed to identify successful strategies used by investigators for working with their Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in conducting human subjects research. Telephone interviews were conducted with 46 investigators representing nursing, medicine, and social work. Interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. Investigators emphasized the importance of intentionally cultivating positive relationships with IRB staff and members, and managing bureaucracy. A few used evasive measures to avoid conflict with IRBs. Few successful strategies were identified for working with multiple IRBs. Although most investigators developed successful methods for working with IRBs, further research is needed on how differences in IRB culture affect human subjects protection, and on best approaches for obtaining IRB approval of multi-site studies.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)478-486
    Number of pages9
    JournalResearch in Nursing and Health
    Volume36
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Research Ethics Committees
    Research Personnel
    Interviews
    Social Work
    Research
    Nursing
    Medicine

    Keywords

    • Human subjects protection
    • Human subjects research
    • Institutional review board
    • Qualitative
    • Research ethics

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Nursing(all)
    • Medicine(all)

    Cite this

    Investigators' successful strategies for working with institutional review boards. / Cartwright, Juliana; Hickman, Susan E.; Nelson, Christine A.; Knafl, Kathleen A.

    In: Research in Nursing and Health, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2013, p. 478-486.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Cartwright, Juliana ; Hickman, Susan E. ; Nelson, Christine A. ; Knafl, Kathleen A. / Investigators' successful strategies for working with institutional review boards. In: Research in Nursing and Health. 2013 ; Vol. 36, No. 5. pp. 478-486.
    @article{6d379bc593e642c39a576c219358855a,
    title = "Investigators' successful strategies for working with institutional review boards",
    abstract = "This study was designed to identify successful strategies used by investigators for working with their Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in conducting human subjects research. Telephone interviews were conducted with 46 investigators representing nursing, medicine, and social work. Interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. Investigators emphasized the importance of intentionally cultivating positive relationships with IRB staff and members, and managing bureaucracy. A few used evasive measures to avoid conflict with IRBs. Few successful strategies were identified for working with multiple IRBs. Although most investigators developed successful methods for working with IRBs, further research is needed on how differences in IRB culture affect human subjects protection, and on best approaches for obtaining IRB approval of multi-site studies.",
    keywords = "Human subjects protection, Human subjects research, Institutional review board, Qualitative, Research ethics",
    author = "Juliana Cartwright and Hickman, {Susan E.} and Nelson, {Christine A.} and Knafl, {Kathleen A.}",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1002/nur.21553",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "36",
    pages = "478--486",
    journal = "Research in Nursing and Health",
    issn = "0160-6891",
    publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
    number = "5",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Investigators' successful strategies for working with institutional review boards

    AU - Cartwright, Juliana

    AU - Hickman, Susan E.

    AU - Nelson, Christine A.

    AU - Knafl, Kathleen A.

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - This study was designed to identify successful strategies used by investigators for working with their Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in conducting human subjects research. Telephone interviews were conducted with 46 investigators representing nursing, medicine, and social work. Interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. Investigators emphasized the importance of intentionally cultivating positive relationships with IRB staff and members, and managing bureaucracy. A few used evasive measures to avoid conflict with IRBs. Few successful strategies were identified for working with multiple IRBs. Although most investigators developed successful methods for working with IRBs, further research is needed on how differences in IRB culture affect human subjects protection, and on best approaches for obtaining IRB approval of multi-site studies.

    AB - This study was designed to identify successful strategies used by investigators for working with their Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in conducting human subjects research. Telephone interviews were conducted with 46 investigators representing nursing, medicine, and social work. Interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. Investigators emphasized the importance of intentionally cultivating positive relationships with IRB staff and members, and managing bureaucracy. A few used evasive measures to avoid conflict with IRBs. Few successful strategies were identified for working with multiple IRBs. Although most investigators developed successful methods for working with IRBs, further research is needed on how differences in IRB culture affect human subjects protection, and on best approaches for obtaining IRB approval of multi-site studies.

    KW - Human subjects protection

    KW - Human subjects research

    KW - Institutional review board

    KW - Qualitative

    KW - Research ethics

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891723419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891723419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1002/nur.21553

    DO - 10.1002/nur.21553

    M3 - Article

    VL - 36

    SP - 478

    EP - 486

    JO - Research in Nursing and Health

    JF - Research in Nursing and Health

    SN - 0160-6891

    IS - 5

    ER -