Intraoperative neuromonitoring for one-level lumbar discectomies is low yield and cost-ineffective

Katie L. Krause, Barry Cheaney, James T. Obayashi, Aaron Kawamoto, Khoi Than

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Intraoperative neuromonitoring is a common, well-established modality used in spine surgery to prevent intraoperative neural injury. Neuromonitoring use in lumbar discectomy, however, is based on surgeon preference, without evidence-based data. The purpose of this research was to determine intraoperative utility and overall cost effectiveness of neuromonitoring for lumbar discectomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adult patients who underwent a lumbar discectomy, with at least 1 month of follow-up at a single tertiary care center. Patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), lumbar level operated, and operative time and cost were collected. Neuromonitoring and operative reports were reviewed for any electromyography (EMG) abnormalities noted intraoperatively, pre- and post-operative motor exam and post-operative pain relief were collected. Results: Ninety-one (47 with and 44 without neuromonitoring) lumbar discectomy cases were reviewed. There was no significant difference between mean age, sex, and BMI between the two groups. There was a significant (p = 0.006) increase in operating room time (174 min; with vs. 144 min; without neuromonitoring). Neuromonitoring was associated with a significant (p = 0.006) overall operative cost ($21,949; with vs. $18,064; without). Of the 47 cases with neuromonitoring; one had abnormal intraoperative EMG activity, which returned to normal by case conclusion. No patient in either group demonstrated new post-operative motor weakness. There was no difference in the number of patients who endorsed post-operative pain relief between the two groups. Conclusions: Neuromonitoring for lumbar discectomy confers greater operative time and cost, without any difference in neurological outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Clinical Neuroscience
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Diskectomy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Electromyography
Operative Time
Body Mass Index
Pain
Operating Rooms
Tertiary Care Centers
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Spine
Wounds and Injuries
Research

Keywords

  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Intraoperative
  • Lumbar discectomy
  • Neuromonitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Intraoperative neuromonitoring for one-level lumbar discectomies is low yield and cost-ineffective. / Krause, Katie L.; Cheaney, Barry; Obayashi, James T.; Kawamoto, Aaron; Than, Khoi.

In: Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f9dacfe25fc1418da7540e576e0aeab4,
title = "Intraoperative neuromonitoring for one-level lumbar discectomies is low yield and cost-ineffective",
abstract = "Background: Intraoperative neuromonitoring is a common, well-established modality used in spine surgery to prevent intraoperative neural injury. Neuromonitoring use in lumbar discectomy, however, is based on surgeon preference, without evidence-based data. The purpose of this research was to determine intraoperative utility and overall cost effectiveness of neuromonitoring for lumbar discectomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adult patients who underwent a lumbar discectomy, with at least 1 month of follow-up at a single tertiary care center. Patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), lumbar level operated, and operative time and cost were collected. Neuromonitoring and operative reports were reviewed for any electromyography (EMG) abnormalities noted intraoperatively, pre- and post-operative motor exam and post-operative pain relief were collected. Results: Ninety-one (47 with and 44 without neuromonitoring) lumbar discectomy cases were reviewed. There was no significant difference between mean age, sex, and BMI between the two groups. There was a significant (p = 0.006) increase in operating room time (174 min; with vs. 144 min; without neuromonitoring). Neuromonitoring was associated with a significant (p = 0.006) overall operative cost ($21,949; with vs. $18,064; without). Of the 47 cases with neuromonitoring; one had abnormal intraoperative EMG activity, which returned to normal by case conclusion. No patient in either group demonstrated new post-operative motor weakness. There was no difference in the number of patients who endorsed post-operative pain relief between the two groups. Conclusions: Neuromonitoring for lumbar discectomy confers greater operative time and cost, without any difference in neurological outcome.",
keywords = "Cost-effectiveness, Intraoperative, Lumbar discectomy, Neuromonitoring",
author = "Krause, {Katie L.} and Barry Cheaney and Obayashi, {James T.} and Aaron Kawamoto and Khoi Than",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jocn.2019.08.116",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Neuroscience",
issn = "0967-5868",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intraoperative neuromonitoring for one-level lumbar discectomies is low yield and cost-ineffective

AU - Krause, Katie L.

AU - Cheaney, Barry

AU - Obayashi, James T.

AU - Kawamoto, Aaron

AU - Than, Khoi

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Intraoperative neuromonitoring is a common, well-established modality used in spine surgery to prevent intraoperative neural injury. Neuromonitoring use in lumbar discectomy, however, is based on surgeon preference, without evidence-based data. The purpose of this research was to determine intraoperative utility and overall cost effectiveness of neuromonitoring for lumbar discectomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adult patients who underwent a lumbar discectomy, with at least 1 month of follow-up at a single tertiary care center. Patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), lumbar level operated, and operative time and cost were collected. Neuromonitoring and operative reports were reviewed for any electromyography (EMG) abnormalities noted intraoperatively, pre- and post-operative motor exam and post-operative pain relief were collected. Results: Ninety-one (47 with and 44 without neuromonitoring) lumbar discectomy cases were reviewed. There was no significant difference between mean age, sex, and BMI between the two groups. There was a significant (p = 0.006) increase in operating room time (174 min; with vs. 144 min; without neuromonitoring). Neuromonitoring was associated with a significant (p = 0.006) overall operative cost ($21,949; with vs. $18,064; without). Of the 47 cases with neuromonitoring; one had abnormal intraoperative EMG activity, which returned to normal by case conclusion. No patient in either group demonstrated new post-operative motor weakness. There was no difference in the number of patients who endorsed post-operative pain relief between the two groups. Conclusions: Neuromonitoring for lumbar discectomy confers greater operative time and cost, without any difference in neurological outcome.

AB - Background: Intraoperative neuromonitoring is a common, well-established modality used in spine surgery to prevent intraoperative neural injury. Neuromonitoring use in lumbar discectomy, however, is based on surgeon preference, without evidence-based data. The purpose of this research was to determine intraoperative utility and overall cost effectiveness of neuromonitoring for lumbar discectomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adult patients who underwent a lumbar discectomy, with at least 1 month of follow-up at a single tertiary care center. Patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), lumbar level operated, and operative time and cost were collected. Neuromonitoring and operative reports were reviewed for any electromyography (EMG) abnormalities noted intraoperatively, pre- and post-operative motor exam and post-operative pain relief were collected. Results: Ninety-one (47 with and 44 without neuromonitoring) lumbar discectomy cases were reviewed. There was no significant difference between mean age, sex, and BMI between the two groups. There was a significant (p = 0.006) increase in operating room time (174 min; with vs. 144 min; without neuromonitoring). Neuromonitoring was associated with a significant (p = 0.006) overall operative cost ($21,949; with vs. $18,064; without). Of the 47 cases with neuromonitoring; one had abnormal intraoperative EMG activity, which returned to normal by case conclusion. No patient in either group demonstrated new post-operative motor weakness. There was no difference in the number of patients who endorsed post-operative pain relief between the two groups. Conclusions: Neuromonitoring for lumbar discectomy confers greater operative time and cost, without any difference in neurological outcome.

KW - Cost-effectiveness

KW - Intraoperative

KW - Lumbar discectomy

KW - Neuromonitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071682469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071682469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.08.116

DO - 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.08.116

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85071682469

JO - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

SN - 0967-5868

ER -