TY - JOUR
T1 - Intraoperative neuromonitoring for one-level lumbar discectomies is low yield and cost-ineffective
AU - Krause, Katie L.
AU - Cheaney, Barry
AU - Obayashi, James T.
AU - Kawamoto, Aaron
AU - Than, Khoi D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/1
Y1 - 2020/1
N2 - Background: Intraoperative neuromonitoring is a common, well-established modality used in spine surgery to prevent intraoperative neural injury. Neuromonitoring use in lumbar discectomy, however, is based on surgeon preference, without evidence-based data. The purpose of this research was to determine intraoperative utility and overall cost effectiveness of neuromonitoring for lumbar discectomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adult patients who underwent a lumbar discectomy, with at least 1 month of follow-up at a single tertiary care center. Patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), lumbar level operated, and operative time and cost were collected. Neuromonitoring and operative reports were reviewed for any electromyography (EMG) abnormalities noted intraoperatively, pre- and post-operative motor exam and post-operative pain relief were collected. Results: Ninety-one (47 with and 44 without neuromonitoring) lumbar discectomy cases were reviewed. There was no significant difference between mean age, sex, and BMI between the two groups. There was a significant (p = 0.006) increase in operating room time (174 min; with vs. 144 min; without neuromonitoring). Neuromonitoring was associated with a significant (p = 0.006) overall operative cost ($21,949; with vs. $18,064; without). Of the 47 cases with neuromonitoring; one had abnormal intraoperative EMG activity, which returned to normal by case conclusion. No patient in either group demonstrated new post-operative motor weakness. There was no difference in the number of patients who endorsed post-operative pain relief between the two groups. Conclusions: Neuromonitoring for lumbar discectomy confers greater operative time and cost, without any difference in neurological outcome.
AB - Background: Intraoperative neuromonitoring is a common, well-established modality used in spine surgery to prevent intraoperative neural injury. Neuromonitoring use in lumbar discectomy, however, is based on surgeon preference, without evidence-based data. The purpose of this research was to determine intraoperative utility and overall cost effectiveness of neuromonitoring for lumbar discectomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adult patients who underwent a lumbar discectomy, with at least 1 month of follow-up at a single tertiary care center. Patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), lumbar level operated, and operative time and cost were collected. Neuromonitoring and operative reports were reviewed for any electromyography (EMG) abnormalities noted intraoperatively, pre- and post-operative motor exam and post-operative pain relief were collected. Results: Ninety-one (47 with and 44 without neuromonitoring) lumbar discectomy cases were reviewed. There was no significant difference between mean age, sex, and BMI between the two groups. There was a significant (p = 0.006) increase in operating room time (174 min; with vs. 144 min; without neuromonitoring). Neuromonitoring was associated with a significant (p = 0.006) overall operative cost ($21,949; with vs. $18,064; without). Of the 47 cases with neuromonitoring; one had abnormal intraoperative EMG activity, which returned to normal by case conclusion. No patient in either group demonstrated new post-operative motor weakness. There was no difference in the number of patients who endorsed post-operative pain relief between the two groups. Conclusions: Neuromonitoring for lumbar discectomy confers greater operative time and cost, without any difference in neurological outcome.
KW - Cost-effectiveness
KW - Intraoperative
KW - Lumbar discectomy
KW - Neuromonitoring
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071682469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071682469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.08.116
DO - 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.08.116
M3 - Article
C2 - 31495654
AN - SCOPUS:85071682469
SN - 0967-5868
VL - 71
SP - 97
EP - 100
JO - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
JF - Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
ER -