Abstract
Background: Developmental researchers use a variety of research designs to examine aging-related changes. Most longitudinal studies of aging are based on research designs that feature successive, widely spaced, assessments to estimate changes in cognitive performance. Such designs assume that short-term variations in cognitive performance are small relative to long-term changes or have modeled such phenomena as nuisance parameters. Objective: There is now sufficient empirical evidence to establish intraindividual cognitive variability as a systematic source of individual differences and of important predictive value for aging-relevant outcomes. Methods: After an overview of types of change, potential underlying processes, and adequate analytic designs, we discuss consequences for lifespan aging research. Results: We emphasize that interpretations of both cross-sectional and longitudinal results need to consider and specify theoretical assumptions about short-term and long-term changes. Conclusions: Above and beyond the analysis of long-term mean changes, short-term changes are an important aspect of aging-related change, and their analysis may help to explain psychological processes of adaptation.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 7-11 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Gerontology |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2004 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Adaptation
- Cognitive aging
- Intraindividual variability
- Longitudinal studies
- Theories of aging
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Aging
- Geriatrics and Gerontology