Interreader reliability for a new classification of lumbar disk disease.

J. G. Jarvik, D. R. Haynor, T. D. Koepsell, A. Bronstein, D. Ashley, Richard (Rick) Deyo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The nomenclature that divides disk herniations into protrusions and extrusions may increase the specificity of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for clinically important lesions. Our goal was to determine this terminology's interreader reliability. METHODS: Three readers who were unaware of patients' histories independently read MR images of 34 consecutive patients with back pain. Readers classified disks at the lowest three lumbar levels as normal, bulging, protruded, or extruded. Kappa and weighted kappa values were the primary measures of agreement. RESULTS: Weighted kappa values showed fair-to-moderate agreement. Kappas for the dichotomous decision of extrusion present or absent were more variable, ranging from 0 to .78. Major disagreements (greater than a single category) occurred with 6.2% of all comparisons and in 10 of 34 volunteers; five involved extrusions. CONCLUSION: Overall, readers achieved moderate agreement for this new nomenclature. However, agreement for the presence or absence of an extrusion was less reliable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)537-544
Number of pages8
JournalAcademic Radiology
Volume3
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Terminology
Back Pain
Volunteers
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Intervertebral disc disease

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Jarvik, J. G., Haynor, D. R., Koepsell, T. D., Bronstein, A., Ashley, D., & Deyo, R. R. (1996). Interreader reliability for a new classification of lumbar disk disease. Academic Radiology, 3(7), 537-544.

Interreader reliability for a new classification of lumbar disk disease. / Jarvik, J. G.; Haynor, D. R.; Koepsell, T. D.; Bronstein, A.; Ashley, D.; Deyo, Richard (Rick).

In: Academic Radiology, Vol. 3, No. 7, 07.1996, p. 537-544.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jarvik, JG, Haynor, DR, Koepsell, TD, Bronstein, A, Ashley, D & Deyo, RR 1996, 'Interreader reliability for a new classification of lumbar disk disease.', Academic Radiology, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 537-544.
Jarvik JG, Haynor DR, Koepsell TD, Bronstein A, Ashley D, Deyo RR. Interreader reliability for a new classification of lumbar disk disease. Academic Radiology. 1996 Jul;3(7):537-544.
Jarvik, J. G. ; Haynor, D. R. ; Koepsell, T. D. ; Bronstein, A. ; Ashley, D. ; Deyo, Richard (Rick). / Interreader reliability for a new classification of lumbar disk disease. In: Academic Radiology. 1996 ; Vol. 3, No. 7. pp. 537-544.
@article{cc86de72a31541b09f28eac2139b6dbb,
title = "Interreader reliability for a new classification of lumbar disk disease.",
abstract = "RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The nomenclature that divides disk herniations into protrusions and extrusions may increase the specificity of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for clinically important lesions. Our goal was to determine this terminology's interreader reliability. METHODS: Three readers who were unaware of patients' histories independently read MR images of 34 consecutive patients with back pain. Readers classified disks at the lowest three lumbar levels as normal, bulging, protruded, or extruded. Kappa and weighted kappa values were the primary measures of agreement. RESULTS: Weighted kappa values showed fair-to-moderate agreement. Kappas for the dichotomous decision of extrusion present or absent were more variable, ranging from 0 to .78. Major disagreements (greater than a single category) occurred with 6.2{\%} of all comparisons and in 10 of 34 volunteers; five involved extrusions. CONCLUSION: Overall, readers achieved moderate agreement for this new nomenclature. However, agreement for the presence or absence of an extrusion was less reliable.",
author = "Jarvik, {J. G.} and Haynor, {D. R.} and Koepsell, {T. D.} and A. Bronstein and D. Ashley and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)}",
year = "1996",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "537--544",
journal = "Academic Radiology",
issn = "1076-6332",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interreader reliability for a new classification of lumbar disk disease.

AU - Jarvik, J. G.

AU - Haynor, D. R.

AU - Koepsell, T. D.

AU - Bronstein, A.

AU - Ashley, D.

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

PY - 1996/7

Y1 - 1996/7

N2 - RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The nomenclature that divides disk herniations into protrusions and extrusions may increase the specificity of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for clinically important lesions. Our goal was to determine this terminology's interreader reliability. METHODS: Three readers who were unaware of patients' histories independently read MR images of 34 consecutive patients with back pain. Readers classified disks at the lowest three lumbar levels as normal, bulging, protruded, or extruded. Kappa and weighted kappa values were the primary measures of agreement. RESULTS: Weighted kappa values showed fair-to-moderate agreement. Kappas for the dichotomous decision of extrusion present or absent were more variable, ranging from 0 to .78. Major disagreements (greater than a single category) occurred with 6.2% of all comparisons and in 10 of 34 volunteers; five involved extrusions. CONCLUSION: Overall, readers achieved moderate agreement for this new nomenclature. However, agreement for the presence or absence of an extrusion was less reliable.

AB - RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The nomenclature that divides disk herniations into protrusions and extrusions may increase the specificity of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for clinically important lesions. Our goal was to determine this terminology's interreader reliability. METHODS: Three readers who were unaware of patients' histories independently read MR images of 34 consecutive patients with back pain. Readers classified disks at the lowest three lumbar levels as normal, bulging, protruded, or extruded. Kappa and weighted kappa values were the primary measures of agreement. RESULTS: Weighted kappa values showed fair-to-moderate agreement. Kappas for the dichotomous decision of extrusion present or absent were more variable, ranging from 0 to .78. Major disagreements (greater than a single category) occurred with 6.2% of all comparisons and in 10 of 34 volunteers; five involved extrusions. CONCLUSION: Overall, readers achieved moderate agreement for this new nomenclature. However, agreement for the presence or absence of an extrusion was less reliable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030187674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030187674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8796714

AN - SCOPUS:0030187674

VL - 3

SP - 537

EP - 544

JO - Academic Radiology

JF - Academic Radiology

SN - 1076-6332

IS - 7

ER -