Interpreting the Clinical Importance of Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials: IMMPACT Recommendations

Robert H. Dworkin, Dennis C. Turk, Kathleen W. Wyrwich, Dorcas Beaton, Charles S. Cleeland, John T. Farrar, Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite, Mark P. Jensen, Robert D. Kerns, Deborah N. Ader, Nancy Brandenburg, Laurie B. Burke, David Cella, Julie Chandler, Penny Cowan, Rozalina Dimitrova, Raymond Dionne, Sharon Hertz, Alejandro R. Jadad, Nathaniel P. KatzHenrik Kehlet, Lynn D. Kramer, Donald C. Manning, Cynthia McCormick, Michael P. McDermott, Henry J. McQuay, Sanjay Patel, Linda Porter, Steve Quessy, Bob A. Rappaport, Christine Rauschkolb, Dennis A. Revicki, Margaret Rothman, Kenneth E. Schmader, Brett R. Stacey, Joseph W. Stauffer, Thorsten von Stein, Richard E. White, James Witter, Stojan Zavisic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1538 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A consensus meeting was convened by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) to provide recommendations for interpreting clinical importance of treatment outcomes in clinical trials of the efficacy and effectiveness of chronic pain treatments. A group of 40 participants from universities, governmental agencies, a patient self-help organization, and the pharmaceutical industry considered methodologic issues and research results relevant to determining the clinical importance of changes in the specific outcome measures previously recommended by IMMPACT for 4 core chronic pain outcome domains: (1) Pain intensity, assessed by a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale; (2) physical functioning, assessed by the Multidimensional Pain Inventory and Brief Pain Inventory interference scales; (3) emotional functioning, assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory and Profile of Mood States; and (4) participant ratings of overall improvement, assessed by the Patient Global Impression of Change scale. It is recommended that 2 or more different methods be used to evaluate the clinical importance of improvement or worsening for chronic pain clinical trial outcome measures. Provisional benchmarks for identifying clinically important changes in specific outcome measures that can be used for outcome studies of treatments for chronic pain are proposed. Perspective: Systematically collecting and reporting the recommended information needed to evaluate the clinical importance of treatment outcomes of chronic pain clinical trials will allow additional validation of proposed benchmarks and provide more meaningful comparisons of chronic pain treatments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-121
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Pain
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2008

Fingerprint

Pain Measurement
Chronic Pain
Clinical Trials
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Benchmarking
Pain
Equipment and Supplies
Drug Industry
Consensus
Therapeutics
Depression
Research

Keywords

  • assessment
  • Chronic pain
  • clinical importance
  • emotional functioning
  • global ratings
  • outcome measures
  • physical functioning
  • quality of life
  • randomized clinical trials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Dworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Wyrwich, K. W., Beaton, D., Cleeland, C. S., Farrar, J. T., ... Zavisic, S. (2008). Interpreting the Clinical Importance of Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials: IMMPACT Recommendations. Journal of Pain, 9(2), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005

Interpreting the Clinical Importance of Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials : IMMPACT Recommendations. / Dworkin, Robert H.; Turk, Dennis C.; Wyrwich, Kathleen W.; Beaton, Dorcas; Cleeland, Charles S.; Farrar, John T.; Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A.; Jensen, Mark P.; Kerns, Robert D.; Ader, Deborah N.; Brandenburg, Nancy; Burke, Laurie B.; Cella, David; Chandler, Julie; Cowan, Penny; Dimitrova, Rozalina; Dionne, Raymond; Hertz, Sharon; Jadad, Alejandro R.; Katz, Nathaniel P.; Kehlet, Henrik; Kramer, Lynn D.; Manning, Donald C.; McCormick, Cynthia; McDermott, Michael P.; McQuay, Henry J.; Patel, Sanjay; Porter, Linda; Quessy, Steve; Rappaport, Bob A.; Rauschkolb, Christine; Revicki, Dennis A.; Rothman, Margaret; Schmader, Kenneth E.; Stacey, Brett R.; Stauffer, Joseph W.; von Stein, Thorsten; White, Richard E.; Witter, James; Zavisic, Stojan.

In: Journal of Pain, Vol. 9, No. 2, 02.2008, p. 105-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dworkin, RH, Turk, DC, Wyrwich, KW, Beaton, D, Cleeland, CS, Farrar, JT, Haythornthwaite, JA, Jensen, MP, Kerns, RD, Ader, DN, Brandenburg, N, Burke, LB, Cella, D, Chandler, J, Cowan, P, Dimitrova, R, Dionne, R, Hertz, S, Jadad, AR, Katz, NP, Kehlet, H, Kramer, LD, Manning, DC, McCormick, C, McDermott, MP, McQuay, HJ, Patel, S, Porter, L, Quessy, S, Rappaport, BA, Rauschkolb, C, Revicki, DA, Rothman, M, Schmader, KE, Stacey, BR, Stauffer, JW, von Stein, T, White, RE, Witter, J & Zavisic, S 2008, 'Interpreting the Clinical Importance of Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials: IMMPACT Recommendations', Journal of Pain, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005
Dworkin, Robert H. ; Turk, Dennis C. ; Wyrwich, Kathleen W. ; Beaton, Dorcas ; Cleeland, Charles S. ; Farrar, John T. ; Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A. ; Jensen, Mark P. ; Kerns, Robert D. ; Ader, Deborah N. ; Brandenburg, Nancy ; Burke, Laurie B. ; Cella, David ; Chandler, Julie ; Cowan, Penny ; Dimitrova, Rozalina ; Dionne, Raymond ; Hertz, Sharon ; Jadad, Alejandro R. ; Katz, Nathaniel P. ; Kehlet, Henrik ; Kramer, Lynn D. ; Manning, Donald C. ; McCormick, Cynthia ; McDermott, Michael P. ; McQuay, Henry J. ; Patel, Sanjay ; Porter, Linda ; Quessy, Steve ; Rappaport, Bob A. ; Rauschkolb, Christine ; Revicki, Dennis A. ; Rothman, Margaret ; Schmader, Kenneth E. ; Stacey, Brett R. ; Stauffer, Joseph W. ; von Stein, Thorsten ; White, Richard E. ; Witter, James ; Zavisic, Stojan. / Interpreting the Clinical Importance of Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials : IMMPACT Recommendations. In: Journal of Pain. 2008 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 105-121.
@article{17558e544603412da500d71d640a9e00,
title = "Interpreting the Clinical Importance of Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials: IMMPACT Recommendations",
abstract = "A consensus meeting was convened by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) to provide recommendations for interpreting clinical importance of treatment outcomes in clinical trials of the efficacy and effectiveness of chronic pain treatments. A group of 40 participants from universities, governmental agencies, a patient self-help organization, and the pharmaceutical industry considered methodologic issues and research results relevant to determining the clinical importance of changes in the specific outcome measures previously recommended by IMMPACT for 4 core chronic pain outcome domains: (1) Pain intensity, assessed by a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale; (2) physical functioning, assessed by the Multidimensional Pain Inventory and Brief Pain Inventory interference scales; (3) emotional functioning, assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory and Profile of Mood States; and (4) participant ratings of overall improvement, assessed by the Patient Global Impression of Change scale. It is recommended that 2 or more different methods be used to evaluate the clinical importance of improvement or worsening for chronic pain clinical trial outcome measures. Provisional benchmarks for identifying clinically important changes in specific outcome measures that can be used for outcome studies of treatments for chronic pain are proposed. Perspective: Systematically collecting and reporting the recommended information needed to evaluate the clinical importance of treatment outcomes of chronic pain clinical trials will allow additional validation of proposed benchmarks and provide more meaningful comparisons of chronic pain treatments.",
keywords = "assessment, Chronic pain, clinical importance, emotional functioning, global ratings, outcome measures, physical functioning, quality of life, randomized clinical trials",
author = "Dworkin, {Robert H.} and Turk, {Dennis C.} and Wyrwich, {Kathleen W.} and Dorcas Beaton and Cleeland, {Charles S.} and Farrar, {John T.} and Haythornthwaite, {Jennifer A.} and Jensen, {Mark P.} and Kerns, {Robert D.} and Ader, {Deborah N.} and Nancy Brandenburg and Burke, {Laurie B.} and David Cella and Julie Chandler and Penny Cowan and Rozalina Dimitrova and Raymond Dionne and Sharon Hertz and Jadad, {Alejandro R.} and Katz, {Nathaniel P.} and Henrik Kehlet and Kramer, {Lynn D.} and Manning, {Donald C.} and Cynthia McCormick and McDermott, {Michael P.} and McQuay, {Henry J.} and Sanjay Patel and Linda Porter and Steve Quessy and Rappaport, {Bob A.} and Christine Rauschkolb and Revicki, {Dennis A.} and Margaret Rothman and Schmader, {Kenneth E.} and Stacey, {Brett R.} and Stauffer, {Joseph W.} and {von Stein}, Thorsten and White, {Richard E.} and James Witter and Stojan Zavisic",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "105--121",
journal = "Journal of Pain",
issn = "1526-5900",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpreting the Clinical Importance of Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials

T2 - IMMPACT Recommendations

AU - Dworkin, Robert H.

AU - Turk, Dennis C.

AU - Wyrwich, Kathleen W.

AU - Beaton, Dorcas

AU - Cleeland, Charles S.

AU - Farrar, John T.

AU - Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A.

AU - Jensen, Mark P.

AU - Kerns, Robert D.

AU - Ader, Deborah N.

AU - Brandenburg, Nancy

AU - Burke, Laurie B.

AU - Cella, David

AU - Chandler, Julie

AU - Cowan, Penny

AU - Dimitrova, Rozalina

AU - Dionne, Raymond

AU - Hertz, Sharon

AU - Jadad, Alejandro R.

AU - Katz, Nathaniel P.

AU - Kehlet, Henrik

AU - Kramer, Lynn D.

AU - Manning, Donald C.

AU - McCormick, Cynthia

AU - McDermott, Michael P.

AU - McQuay, Henry J.

AU - Patel, Sanjay

AU - Porter, Linda

AU - Quessy, Steve

AU - Rappaport, Bob A.

AU - Rauschkolb, Christine

AU - Revicki, Dennis A.

AU - Rothman, Margaret

AU - Schmader, Kenneth E.

AU - Stacey, Brett R.

AU - Stauffer, Joseph W.

AU - von Stein, Thorsten

AU - White, Richard E.

AU - Witter, James

AU - Zavisic, Stojan

PY - 2008/2

Y1 - 2008/2

N2 - A consensus meeting was convened by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) to provide recommendations for interpreting clinical importance of treatment outcomes in clinical trials of the efficacy and effectiveness of chronic pain treatments. A group of 40 participants from universities, governmental agencies, a patient self-help organization, and the pharmaceutical industry considered methodologic issues and research results relevant to determining the clinical importance of changes in the specific outcome measures previously recommended by IMMPACT for 4 core chronic pain outcome domains: (1) Pain intensity, assessed by a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale; (2) physical functioning, assessed by the Multidimensional Pain Inventory and Brief Pain Inventory interference scales; (3) emotional functioning, assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory and Profile of Mood States; and (4) participant ratings of overall improvement, assessed by the Patient Global Impression of Change scale. It is recommended that 2 or more different methods be used to evaluate the clinical importance of improvement or worsening for chronic pain clinical trial outcome measures. Provisional benchmarks for identifying clinically important changes in specific outcome measures that can be used for outcome studies of treatments for chronic pain are proposed. Perspective: Systematically collecting and reporting the recommended information needed to evaluate the clinical importance of treatment outcomes of chronic pain clinical trials will allow additional validation of proposed benchmarks and provide more meaningful comparisons of chronic pain treatments.

AB - A consensus meeting was convened by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) to provide recommendations for interpreting clinical importance of treatment outcomes in clinical trials of the efficacy and effectiveness of chronic pain treatments. A group of 40 participants from universities, governmental agencies, a patient self-help organization, and the pharmaceutical industry considered methodologic issues and research results relevant to determining the clinical importance of changes in the specific outcome measures previously recommended by IMMPACT for 4 core chronic pain outcome domains: (1) Pain intensity, assessed by a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale; (2) physical functioning, assessed by the Multidimensional Pain Inventory and Brief Pain Inventory interference scales; (3) emotional functioning, assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory and Profile of Mood States; and (4) participant ratings of overall improvement, assessed by the Patient Global Impression of Change scale. It is recommended that 2 or more different methods be used to evaluate the clinical importance of improvement or worsening for chronic pain clinical trial outcome measures. Provisional benchmarks for identifying clinically important changes in specific outcome measures that can be used for outcome studies of treatments for chronic pain are proposed. Perspective: Systematically collecting and reporting the recommended information needed to evaluate the clinical importance of treatment outcomes of chronic pain clinical trials will allow additional validation of proposed benchmarks and provide more meaningful comparisons of chronic pain treatments.

KW - assessment

KW - Chronic pain

KW - clinical importance

KW - emotional functioning

KW - global ratings

KW - outcome measures

KW - physical functioning

KW - quality of life

KW - randomized clinical trials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38549181857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38549181857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 18055266

AN - SCOPUS:38549181857

VL - 9

SP - 105

EP - 121

JO - Journal of Pain

JF - Journal of Pain

SN - 1526-5900

IS - 2

ER -