TY - JOUR
T1 - Intensive care unit cultures and end-of-life decision making
AU - Baggs, Judith Gedney
AU - Norton, Sally A.
AU - Schmitt, Madeline H.
AU - Dombeck, Mary T.
AU - Sellers, Craig R.
AU - Quinn, Jill R.
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD), National Institute of Nursing Research, RO1 NR04940.
PY - 2007/6
Y1 - 2007/6
N2 - Purpose: Prior researchers studying end-of-life decision making (EOLDM) in intensive care units (ICUs) often have collected data retrospectively and aggregated data across units. There has been little research, however, about how cultures differ among ICUs. This research was designed to study limitation of treatment decision making in real time and to evaluate similarities and differences in the cultural contexts of 4 ICUs and the relationship of those contexts to EOLDM. Materials and Methods: Ethnographic field work took place in 4 adult ICUs in a tertiary care hospital. Participants were health care providers (eg, physicians, nurses, and social workers), patients, and their family members. Participant observation and interviews took place 5 days a week for 7 months in each unit. Results: The ICUs were not monolithic. There were similarities, but important differences in EOLDM were identified in formal and informal rules, meaning and uses of technology, physician roles and relationships, processes such as unit rounds, and timing of initiation of EOLDM. Conclusions: As interventions to improve EOLDM are developed, it will be important to understand how they may interact with unit cultures. Attempting to develop one intervention to be used in all ICUs is unlikely to be successful.
AB - Purpose: Prior researchers studying end-of-life decision making (EOLDM) in intensive care units (ICUs) often have collected data retrospectively and aggregated data across units. There has been little research, however, about how cultures differ among ICUs. This research was designed to study limitation of treatment decision making in real time and to evaluate similarities and differences in the cultural contexts of 4 ICUs and the relationship of those contexts to EOLDM. Materials and Methods: Ethnographic field work took place in 4 adult ICUs in a tertiary care hospital. Participants were health care providers (eg, physicians, nurses, and social workers), patients, and their family members. Participant observation and interviews took place 5 days a week for 7 months in each unit. Results: The ICUs were not monolithic. There were similarities, but important differences in EOLDM were identified in formal and informal rules, meaning and uses of technology, physician roles and relationships, processes such as unit rounds, and timing of initiation of EOLDM. Conclusions: As interventions to improve EOLDM are developed, it will be important to understand how they may interact with unit cultures. Attempting to develop one intervention to be used in all ICUs is unlikely to be successful.
KW - Critical care
KW - Critical illness
KW - Decision-making
KW - Ethnography
KW - Intensive care (units)
KW - Palliative care
KW - Professional-family relations
KW - Terminal care
KW - Withholding treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249683284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249683284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.09.008
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.09.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 17548028
AN - SCOPUS:34249683284
SN - 0883-9441
VL - 22
SP - 159
EP - 168
JO - Seminars in Anesthesia
JF - Seminars in Anesthesia
IS - 2
ER -