Integration of patient and clinician narratives into systematic reviews: An applied proof of concept

Vivian Christensen; Khaya Clark; Stephanie Tallett; Emily A. Kenyon; Steven K. Dobscha

doi:10.1017/cts.2021.2

Integration of patient and clinician narratives into systematic reviews: An applied proof of concept

Vivian Christensen, Khaya Clark, Stephanie Tallett, Emily A. Kenyon, Steven K. Dobscha

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Health systems currently underutilize systematic reviews. Here, we describe a proof of concept project designed to augment the standard systematic review process by presenting qualitative information as a companion to a review on deprescribing interventions. We conducted a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with Veterans Health Administration clinicians and Veterans to describe first-hand experiences of engaging in the deprescribing process. Qualitative findings were incorporated into an interactive, web-based product designed to supplement the systematic review report. Preliminary evaluation suggests that integration of narratives as a companion to systematic reviews is of interest to frontline clinicians, researchers, and health system administrators.

Original language	English (US)
Article number	e78
Journal	Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Volume	5
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.2
State	Published - 2021

Keywords

Deprescribing
qualitative methodology
systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Medicine

Access to Document

10.1017/cts.2021.2

Cite this

@article{b2c23c39a50c4e7182ff4e5922170599,

title = "Integration of patient and clinician narratives into systematic reviews: An applied proof of concept",

abstract = "Health systems currently underutilize systematic reviews. Here, we describe a proof of concept project designed to augment the standard systematic review process by presenting qualitative information as a companion to a review on deprescribing interventions. We conducted a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with Veterans Health Administration clinicians and Veterans to describe first-hand experiences of engaging in the deprescribing process. Qualitative findings were incorporated into an interactive, web-based product designed to supplement the systematic review report. Preliminary evaluation suggests that integration of narratives as a companion to systematic reviews is of interest to frontline clinicians, researchers, and health system administrators.",

keywords = "Deprescribing, qualitative methodology, systematic review",

author = "Vivian Christensen and Khaya Clark and Stephanie Tallett and Kenyon, {Emily A.} and Dobscha, {Steven K.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2021.",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.1017/cts.2021.2",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "5",

journal = "Journal of Clinical and Translational Science",

issn = "2059-8661",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integration of patient and clinician narratives into systematic reviews

T2 - An applied proof of concept

AU - Christensen, Vivian

AU - Clark, Khaya

AU - Tallett, Stephanie

AU - Kenyon, Emily A.

AU - Dobscha, Steven K.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2021.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Health systems currently underutilize systematic reviews. Here, we describe a proof of concept project designed to augment the standard systematic review process by presenting qualitative information as a companion to a review on deprescribing interventions. We conducted a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with Veterans Health Administration clinicians and Veterans to describe first-hand experiences of engaging in the deprescribing process. Qualitative findings were incorporated into an interactive, web-based product designed to supplement the systematic review report. Preliminary evaluation suggests that integration of narratives as a companion to systematic reviews is of interest to frontline clinicians, researchers, and health system administrators.

AB - Health systems currently underutilize systematic reviews. Here, we describe a proof of concept project designed to augment the standard systematic review process by presenting qualitative information as a companion to a review on deprescribing interventions. We conducted a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with Veterans Health Administration clinicians and Veterans to describe first-hand experiences of engaging in the deprescribing process. Qualitative findings were incorporated into an interactive, web-based product designed to supplement the systematic review report. Preliminary evaluation suggests that integration of narratives as a companion to systematic reviews is of interest to frontline clinicians, researchers, and health system administrators.

KW - Deprescribing

KW - qualitative methodology

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104629310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85104629310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/cts.2021.2

DO - 10.1017/cts.2021.2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85104629310

SN - 2059-8661

VL - 5

JO - Journal of Clinical and Translational Science

JF - Journal of Clinical and Translational Science

IS - 1

M1 - e78

ER -

Integration of patient and clinician narratives into systematic reviews: An applied proof of concept

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this