Insanity defenses: Contested or conceded?

J. L. Rogers, Joseph Bloom, S. M. Manson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors examined 316 Oregon criminal cases in which the accused successfully pleaded the insanity defense. Prosecutors agreed to the insanity verdict in more than four out of five cases. In most cases all examining experts diagnosed the defendant as psychotic. The smaller number of defendants who were diagnosed by the state hospital staff as displaying only personality disorders accounted for a disproportionately large percentage of the contested trials. Observing that Oregon's insanity defense system is run by consensus, the authors suggest a reorientation of the insanity defense debate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)885-888
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Psychiatry
Volume141
Issue number7
StatePublished - 1984

Fingerprint

Insanity Defense
State Hospitals
Personality Disorders
Consensus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Rogers, J. L., Bloom, J., & Manson, S. M. (1984). Insanity defenses: Contested or conceded? American Journal of Psychiatry, 141(7), 885-888.

Insanity defenses : Contested or conceded? / Rogers, J. L.; Bloom, Joseph; Manson, S. M.

In: American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 141, No. 7, 1984, p. 885-888.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rogers, JL, Bloom, J & Manson, SM 1984, 'Insanity defenses: Contested or conceded?', American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 141, no. 7, pp. 885-888.
Rogers JL, Bloom J, Manson SM. Insanity defenses: Contested or conceded? American Journal of Psychiatry. 1984;141(7):885-888.
Rogers, J. L. ; Bloom, Joseph ; Manson, S. M. / Insanity defenses : Contested or conceded?. In: American Journal of Psychiatry. 1984 ; Vol. 141, No. 7. pp. 885-888.
@article{438a5851502c4c54835bebe4847b7d4f,
title = "Insanity defenses: Contested or conceded?",
abstract = "The authors examined 316 Oregon criminal cases in which the accused successfully pleaded the insanity defense. Prosecutors agreed to the insanity verdict in more than four out of five cases. In most cases all examining experts diagnosed the defendant as psychotic. The smaller number of defendants who were diagnosed by the state hospital staff as displaying only personality disorders accounted for a disproportionately large percentage of the contested trials. Observing that Oregon's insanity defense system is run by consensus, the authors suggest a reorientation of the insanity defense debate.",
author = "Rogers, {J. L.} and Joseph Bloom and Manson, {S. M.}",
year = "1984",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "141",
pages = "885--888",
journal = "American Journal of Psychiatry",
issn = "0002-953X",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Insanity defenses

T2 - Contested or conceded?

AU - Rogers, J. L.

AU - Bloom, Joseph

AU - Manson, S. M.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - The authors examined 316 Oregon criminal cases in which the accused successfully pleaded the insanity defense. Prosecutors agreed to the insanity verdict in more than four out of five cases. In most cases all examining experts diagnosed the defendant as psychotic. The smaller number of defendants who were diagnosed by the state hospital staff as displaying only personality disorders accounted for a disproportionately large percentage of the contested trials. Observing that Oregon's insanity defense system is run by consensus, the authors suggest a reorientation of the insanity defense debate.

AB - The authors examined 316 Oregon criminal cases in which the accused successfully pleaded the insanity defense. Prosecutors agreed to the insanity verdict in more than four out of five cases. In most cases all examining experts diagnosed the defendant as psychotic. The smaller number of defendants who were diagnosed by the state hospital staff as displaying only personality disorders accounted for a disproportionately large percentage of the contested trials. Observing that Oregon's insanity defense system is run by consensus, the authors suggest a reorientation of the insanity defense debate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021140809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021140809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6731639

AN - SCOPUS:0021140809

VL - 141

SP - 885

EP - 888

JO - American Journal of Psychiatry

JF - American Journal of Psychiatry

SN - 0002-953X

IS - 7

ER -