Innovating within the ACGME regulatory environment is not an oxymoron

M (Patrice) Eiff, Roger Garvin, Larry A. Green, Perry A. Pugno, Stan Kozakowski, Julie Dostal, Elaine Waller, Patricia (Patty) Carney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the analysis of program citations and cycle length for reaccreditation in the 14 family medicine residencies participating in the P4 project. METHODS: An exploratory narrative analysis was conducted on all actions taken by the Review Committee for Family Medicine (RCFM) between 2003 and 2012. The analysis included cycle length and types of citations associated with accreditation actions. Several validation steps were undertaken to confirm findings reported. RESULTS: Mean cycle length for all P4 programs was 4.0 before P4 (2007) and did not change significantly during P4. The average number of citations per program before P4 was 6.2, and during P4 the average was 6.8. The P4 averages were similar to national norms during the project period. The citations that most commonly decreased during the P4 project were: Continuity of Patient Care/ Inpatient, FMC Patient Population/Patient Volume, Orthopedics or Sports Medicine Curriculum, Resident Final Evaluation, Resident Workload/Duty Hours, and Resident Attrition. The citations that most commonly increased during the P4 project were FMC Patient Population/Demographics, Certifying Exam Scores, and Management of Health Systems Curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: Innovation and redesign of residency training in the P4 programs appears not to have affected the average cycle length or number of citations per program. The current regulatory environment in family medicine residency education appears to allow for innovation and experimentation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)282-287
Number of pages6
JournalFamily Medicine
Volume46
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
Medicine
Curriculum
Sports Medicine
Continuity of Patient Care
Accreditation
Advisory Committees
Workload
Population
Orthopedics
Inpatients
Demography
Education
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Eiff, M. P., Garvin, R., Green, L. A., Pugno, P. A., Kozakowski, S., Dostal, J., ... Carney, P. P. (2014). Innovating within the ACGME regulatory environment is not an oxymoron. Family Medicine, 46(4), 282-287.

Innovating within the ACGME regulatory environment is not an oxymoron. / Eiff, M (Patrice); Garvin, Roger; Green, Larry A.; Pugno, Perry A.; Kozakowski, Stan; Dostal, Julie; Waller, Elaine; Carney, Patricia (Patty).

In: Family Medicine, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2014, p. 282-287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eiff, MP, Garvin, R, Green, LA, Pugno, PA, Kozakowski, S, Dostal, J, Waller, E & Carney, PP 2014, 'Innovating within the ACGME regulatory environment is not an oxymoron', Family Medicine, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 282-287.
Eiff MP, Garvin R, Green LA, Pugno PA, Kozakowski S, Dostal J et al. Innovating within the ACGME regulatory environment is not an oxymoron. Family Medicine. 2014;46(4):282-287.
Eiff, M (Patrice) ; Garvin, Roger ; Green, Larry A. ; Pugno, Perry A. ; Kozakowski, Stan ; Dostal, Julie ; Waller, Elaine ; Carney, Patricia (Patty). / Innovating within the ACGME regulatory environment is not an oxymoron. In: Family Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 46, No. 4. pp. 282-287.
@article{a55fcf12c1524842a501369c4b6cd8a1,
title = "Innovating within the ACGME regulatory environment is not an oxymoron",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the analysis of program citations and cycle length for reaccreditation in the 14 family medicine residencies participating in the P4 project. METHODS: An exploratory narrative analysis was conducted on all actions taken by the Review Committee for Family Medicine (RCFM) between 2003 and 2012. The analysis included cycle length and types of citations associated with accreditation actions. Several validation steps were undertaken to confirm findings reported. RESULTS: Mean cycle length for all P4 programs was 4.0 before P4 (2007) and did not change significantly during P4. The average number of citations per program before P4 was 6.2, and during P4 the average was 6.8. The P4 averages were similar to national norms during the project period. The citations that most commonly decreased during the P4 project were: Continuity of Patient Care/ Inpatient, FMC Patient Population/Patient Volume, Orthopedics or Sports Medicine Curriculum, Resident Final Evaluation, Resident Workload/Duty Hours, and Resident Attrition. The citations that most commonly increased during the P4 project were FMC Patient Population/Demographics, Certifying Exam Scores, and Management of Health Systems Curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: Innovation and redesign of residency training in the P4 programs appears not to have affected the average cycle length or number of citations per program. The current regulatory environment in family medicine residency education appears to allow for innovation and experimentation.",
author = "Eiff, {M (Patrice)} and Roger Garvin and Green, {Larry A.} and Pugno, {Perry A.} and Stan Kozakowski and Julie Dostal and Elaine Waller and Carney, {Patricia (Patty)}",
year = "2014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "282--287",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Innovating within the ACGME regulatory environment is not an oxymoron

AU - Eiff, M (Patrice)

AU - Garvin, Roger

AU - Green, Larry A.

AU - Pugno, Perry A.

AU - Kozakowski, Stan

AU - Dostal, Julie

AU - Waller, Elaine

AU - Carney, Patricia (Patty)

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the analysis of program citations and cycle length for reaccreditation in the 14 family medicine residencies participating in the P4 project. METHODS: An exploratory narrative analysis was conducted on all actions taken by the Review Committee for Family Medicine (RCFM) between 2003 and 2012. The analysis included cycle length and types of citations associated with accreditation actions. Several validation steps were undertaken to confirm findings reported. RESULTS: Mean cycle length for all P4 programs was 4.0 before P4 (2007) and did not change significantly during P4. The average number of citations per program before P4 was 6.2, and during P4 the average was 6.8. The P4 averages were similar to national norms during the project period. The citations that most commonly decreased during the P4 project were: Continuity of Patient Care/ Inpatient, FMC Patient Population/Patient Volume, Orthopedics or Sports Medicine Curriculum, Resident Final Evaluation, Resident Workload/Duty Hours, and Resident Attrition. The citations that most commonly increased during the P4 project were FMC Patient Population/Demographics, Certifying Exam Scores, and Management of Health Systems Curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: Innovation and redesign of residency training in the P4 programs appears not to have affected the average cycle length or number of citations per program. The current regulatory environment in family medicine residency education appears to allow for innovation and experimentation.

AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the analysis of program citations and cycle length for reaccreditation in the 14 family medicine residencies participating in the P4 project. METHODS: An exploratory narrative analysis was conducted on all actions taken by the Review Committee for Family Medicine (RCFM) between 2003 and 2012. The analysis included cycle length and types of citations associated with accreditation actions. Several validation steps were undertaken to confirm findings reported. RESULTS: Mean cycle length for all P4 programs was 4.0 before P4 (2007) and did not change significantly during P4. The average number of citations per program before P4 was 6.2, and during P4 the average was 6.8. The P4 averages were similar to national norms during the project period. The citations that most commonly decreased during the P4 project were: Continuity of Patient Care/ Inpatient, FMC Patient Population/Patient Volume, Orthopedics or Sports Medicine Curriculum, Resident Final Evaluation, Resident Workload/Duty Hours, and Resident Attrition. The citations that most commonly increased during the P4 project were FMC Patient Population/Demographics, Certifying Exam Scores, and Management of Health Systems Curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: Innovation and redesign of residency training in the P4 programs appears not to have affected the average cycle length or number of citations per program. The current regulatory environment in family medicine residency education appears to allow for innovation and experimentation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898865412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898865412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 24788424

AN - SCOPUS:84898865412

VL - 46

SP - 282

EP - 287

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 4

ER -