Injectate port selection affects accuracy and reproducibility of cardiac output measurements with multiport thermodilution pulmonary artery catheters.

L. E. Renner, Linda Meyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy and reproducibility of thermodilution cardiac output measurements obtained from the injectate and infusion ports of a multilumen pulmonary artery catheter. The thermodilution results were compared with an independent measure of flow obtained from an electromagnetic flow meter. METHODS: In an experimental study conducted at an animal research laboratory of a health sciences university, two virgin western breed ewes were surgically instrumented with an inferior vena cava occluder, which reduced venous return and thus lowered cardiac output, and an ascending aortic electromagnetic flow probe, which provided an independent reference measure of cardiac output. On the day of study, a multilumen pulmonary artery catheter was inserted. Cardiac output was manipulated over a range of 2.9 to 12.1 L/min with i.v. isoproterenol or inferior vena cava occlusion. Approximately 30 simultaneous thermodilution and electromagnetic flow meter measurements of cardiac output were obtained from both the infusion and injectate ports in each of the two subjects. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients were lower and standard error of the estimates was higher for the infusion port (r = .83; SEE = 1.19 L/min) vs the injectate port (r = .94; SEE = .74 L/min), indicating reduced reproducibility with infusion port thermodilution cardiac output determinations. Accuracy was also adversely influenced in the infusion port results. The linear regression for the infusion port data intercepted the Y axis at +2.64 L/min, indicating significant overestimation of cardiac output at flows of less than 5 L/min and underestimation of flow when cardiac output exceeded 8 L/min. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the infusion port for the measurement of thermodilution cardiac output measurements may result in nonreproducible and inaccurate results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-61
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses
Volume3
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1994

Fingerprint

Thermodilution
Cardiac Output
Pulmonary Artery
Catheters
Electromagnetic Phenomena
Inferior Vena Cava
Isoproterenol
Linear Models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

@article{648acfed00bb48b394914779dc1aac55,
title = "Injectate port selection affects accuracy and reproducibility of cardiac output measurements with multiport thermodilution pulmonary artery catheters.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy and reproducibility of thermodilution cardiac output measurements obtained from the injectate and infusion ports of a multilumen pulmonary artery catheter. The thermodilution results were compared with an independent measure of flow obtained from an electromagnetic flow meter. METHODS: In an experimental study conducted at an animal research laboratory of a health sciences university, two virgin western breed ewes were surgically instrumented with an inferior vena cava occluder, which reduced venous return and thus lowered cardiac output, and an ascending aortic electromagnetic flow probe, which provided an independent reference measure of cardiac output. On the day of study, a multilumen pulmonary artery catheter was inserted. Cardiac output was manipulated over a range of 2.9 to 12.1 L/min with i.v. isoproterenol or inferior vena cava occlusion. Approximately 30 simultaneous thermodilution and electromagnetic flow meter measurements of cardiac output were obtained from both the infusion and injectate ports in each of the two subjects. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients were lower and standard error of the estimates was higher for the infusion port (r = .83; SEE = 1.19 L/min) vs the injectate port (r = .94; SEE = .74 L/min), indicating reduced reproducibility with infusion port thermodilution cardiac output determinations. Accuracy was also adversely influenced in the infusion port results. The linear regression for the infusion port data intercepted the Y axis at +2.64 L/min, indicating significant overestimation of cardiac output at flows of less than 5 L/min and underestimation of flow when cardiac output exceeded 8 L/min. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the infusion port for the measurement of thermodilution cardiac output measurements may result in nonreproducible and inaccurate results.",
author = "Renner, {L. E.} and Linda Meyer",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "55--61",
journal = "American Journal of Critical Care",
issn = "1062-3264",
publisher = "American Association of Critical Care Nurses",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Injectate port selection affects accuracy and reproducibility of cardiac output measurements with multiport thermodilution pulmonary artery catheters.

AU - Renner, L. E.

AU - Meyer, Linda

PY - 1994/1

Y1 - 1994/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy and reproducibility of thermodilution cardiac output measurements obtained from the injectate and infusion ports of a multilumen pulmonary artery catheter. The thermodilution results were compared with an independent measure of flow obtained from an electromagnetic flow meter. METHODS: In an experimental study conducted at an animal research laboratory of a health sciences university, two virgin western breed ewes were surgically instrumented with an inferior vena cava occluder, which reduced venous return and thus lowered cardiac output, and an ascending aortic electromagnetic flow probe, which provided an independent reference measure of cardiac output. On the day of study, a multilumen pulmonary artery catheter was inserted. Cardiac output was manipulated over a range of 2.9 to 12.1 L/min with i.v. isoproterenol or inferior vena cava occlusion. Approximately 30 simultaneous thermodilution and electromagnetic flow meter measurements of cardiac output were obtained from both the infusion and injectate ports in each of the two subjects. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients were lower and standard error of the estimates was higher for the infusion port (r = .83; SEE = 1.19 L/min) vs the injectate port (r = .94; SEE = .74 L/min), indicating reduced reproducibility with infusion port thermodilution cardiac output determinations. Accuracy was also adversely influenced in the infusion port results. The linear regression for the infusion port data intercepted the Y axis at +2.64 L/min, indicating significant overestimation of cardiac output at flows of less than 5 L/min and underestimation of flow when cardiac output exceeded 8 L/min. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the infusion port for the measurement of thermodilution cardiac output measurements may result in nonreproducible and inaccurate results.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy and reproducibility of thermodilution cardiac output measurements obtained from the injectate and infusion ports of a multilumen pulmonary artery catheter. The thermodilution results were compared with an independent measure of flow obtained from an electromagnetic flow meter. METHODS: In an experimental study conducted at an animal research laboratory of a health sciences university, two virgin western breed ewes were surgically instrumented with an inferior vena cava occluder, which reduced venous return and thus lowered cardiac output, and an ascending aortic electromagnetic flow probe, which provided an independent reference measure of cardiac output. On the day of study, a multilumen pulmonary artery catheter was inserted. Cardiac output was manipulated over a range of 2.9 to 12.1 L/min with i.v. isoproterenol or inferior vena cava occlusion. Approximately 30 simultaneous thermodilution and electromagnetic flow meter measurements of cardiac output were obtained from both the infusion and injectate ports in each of the two subjects. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients were lower and standard error of the estimates was higher for the infusion port (r = .83; SEE = 1.19 L/min) vs the injectate port (r = .94; SEE = .74 L/min), indicating reduced reproducibility with infusion port thermodilution cardiac output determinations. Accuracy was also adversely influenced in the infusion port results. The linear regression for the infusion port data intercepted the Y axis at +2.64 L/min, indicating significant overestimation of cardiac output at flows of less than 5 L/min and underestimation of flow when cardiac output exceeded 8 L/min. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the infusion port for the measurement of thermodilution cardiac output measurements may result in nonreproducible and inaccurate results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027963105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027963105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8118493

AN - SCOPUS:0027963105

VL - 3

SP - 55

EP - 61

JO - American Journal of Critical Care

JF - American Journal of Critical Care

SN - 1062-3264

IS - 1

ER -